0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Fundamental Design Issues of Brush Seals for Industrial Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Saim Dinc, Mehmet Demiroglu, Norman Turnquist, Jason Mortzheim

GE Research and Development Center, Schenectady, NY 12309

Gayle Goetze, John Maupin, James Hopkins

GE Power Generation, Greenville, SC 29602

Christopher Wolfe, Mark Florin

GE Power Generation, Schenectady, NY 12345

J. Turbomach 124(2), 293-300 (Apr 09, 2002) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1451847 History: Received February 27, 2001; Online April 09, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Turnquist, A., Tseng, T., McNickle, A., and Steinetz, B., 1999, “Full Scale Testing of an Aspirating Face Seal With Angular Misalignment,” AIAA Paper No. Paper 99-2682.
Aksit, M. F., Bagepalli, B. S., Demiroglu, M., Dinc, O., S., Kellock, I., and Farrell, T., 1999, “Advanced Flexible Seals for Gas Turbine Shroud Applications,” AIAA Paper No. 99–2827.
Dinc, S., Turnquist, N. A., et al., 1998, “Brush Seals in Industrial Gas Turbines—Turbine Section Interstage Sealing,” AIAA Paper No. 98–3175
Chupp, R. E., Prior, R. J., Loewenthal, R. G., Menendez, R. P., 1997, “Advanced Seal Development for Large Industrial Gas Turbines,” Paper No. AIAA 97-2731, presented at 33rd AIAA? ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Seattle, WA, July 6–9.
Soditus, S. M., 1998, “Commercial Aircraft Maintenance Experience Relating to Current Sealing Technology,” AIAA Paper No. 98–3284.
Chen, L. H., Wood, P. E., Jones, T. V., and Chew, J. W, 1999, “Detailed Experimental Studies of Flow in Large Scale Brush Seal Model and A Comparison with CFD Predictions,” AIAA Paper No. 99-GT-281

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Typical brush seal designs for (a) steam turbine, and (b) gas turbine applications
Grahic Jump Location
Typical brush seal leakage data compared to a typical labyrinth seal
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Typical steam turbine brush seal packing ring assembly. (b) 7EA gas turbine HPP brush seal after 22,000 h of operation.
Grahic Jump Location
Advanced seals locations on a Frame 7EA gas turbine
Grahic Jump Location
Examples of allowable design limits and interaction with the seal design parameters
Grahic Jump Location
Seal relative radial and axial transient closures
Grahic Jump Location
Pressure forces acting on the seal bristle pack
Grahic Jump Location
Flow diagram for bristle stress and deflection analysis
Grahic Jump Location
Seal line to line leakage characteristics as a function of seal ΔP (y scale shows the ratio of brush seal leakage to laby seal leakage)
Grahic Jump Location
Leakage characteristics of a typical seal under seal interference and clearance conditions (y scale shows the ratio of Brush seal leakage at a specified condition seal line-to-line leakage)
Grahic Jump Location
7EA machine HPP brush seal field data during 22,000 h of operation: (from top left corner, clockwise) brush seal clearance due to wear versus labyrinth seal clearance due to rub, brush seal flow versus labyrinth seal flow, additional kW-h saving of the brush seal in the sealing system, brush seal performance degradation over 3 yr (as new seal provided additional 1.1 percent MW, after 3 yr provided 0.7 percent MW, seal returned to the machine after engine overhaul for additional 3 yr service the seal during overhaul is shown in Fig. 3(b))
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Previous version of a seal from the engine after about 1000 cycles; (b) new and improved version of the seal after 2000 cycles at the same location on the similar engine

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In