0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Separated Flow Transition Under Simulated Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions—Part 1: Mean Flow and Turbulence Statistics

[+] Author and Article Information
Ralph J. Volino

Department of Mechanical Engineering, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402e-mail: volino@usna.edu

J. Turbomach 124(4), 645-655 (Nov 07, 2002) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1506938 History: Received January 22, 2002; Online November 07, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Hourmouziadis, J., 1989, “Aerodynamic Design of Low Pressure Turbines,” AGARD Lecture Series, 167.
Mayle,  R. E., 1991, “The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 113, pp. 509–537.
Sharma, O. P., Ni, R. H., and Tanrikut, S., 1994, “Unsteady Flow in Turbines,” AGARD Lecture Series 195, Paper No. 5.
Hodson, H. P., 1991, “Aspects of Unsteady Blade-Surface Boundary Layers and Transition in Axial Turbomachines,” Boundary Layers in Turbomachines, VKI Lecture Series 1991–2006.
Wisler, D. C., 1998, “The Technical and Economic Relevance of Understanding Boundary Layer Transition in Gas Turbine Engines,” Minnowbrook II, 1997 Workshop on Boundary Layer Transition in Turbomachines, J. E. LaGraff and D. E. Ashpis, eds., NASA/CP-1998-206958, pp. 53–64.
Curtis, E. M., Hodson, H. P., Banieghbal, M. R., Denton, J. D., Howell, R. J., and Harvey, N. W., 1996, “Development of Blade Profiles for Low-Pressure Turbine Applications,” ASME Paper 96-GT-358.
Halstead,  D. E., Wisler,  D. C., Okiishi,  T. H., Walker,  G. J., Hodson,  H. P., and Shin,  H.-W., 1997, “Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines: Part 3 of 4—LP Turbines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 119, pp. 225–237.
Solomon, W. J., 2000, “Effects of Turbulence and Solidity on the Boundary Layer Development in a Low Pressure Turbine,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0273.
Gier, J., and Ardey, S., 2001, “On the Impact of Blade Count Reduction on Aerodynamic Performance and Loss Generation in a Three-Stage LP Turbine,” ASME Paper 2001-GT-0197.
Hatman,  A., and Wang,  T., 1999, “A Prediction Model for Separated Flow Transition,” ASME J. Turbomach., 121, pp. 594–602.
Sohn,  K. H., DeWitt,  K. J., and Shyne,  R. J., 2000, “Experimental Investigation of Boundary Layer Behavior in a Simulated Low Pressure Turbine,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 122, pp. 84–89.
Lou,  W., and Hourmouziadis,  J., 2000, “Separation Bubbles Under Steady and Periodic-Unsteady Main Flow Conditions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122, pp. 634–643.
Volino,  R. J., and Hultgren,  L. S., 2001, “Measurements in Separated and Transitional Boundary Layers Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123, pp. 189–197.
Yaras, M. I., 2001, “Measurements of the Effects of Pressure-Gradient History on Separation-Bubble Transition,” ASME Paper 2001-GT-0193.
Murawski, C. G., Sondergaard, R., Rivir, R. B., Simon, T. W., Vafai, K., and Volino, R. J., 1997, “Experimental Study of the Unsteady Aerodynamics in a Linear Cascade with Low Reynolds Number Low Pressure Turbine Blades,” ASME Paper 97-GT-95.
Qiu, S., and Simon, T. W., 1997, “An Experimental Investigation of Transition as Applied to Low Pressure Turbine Suction Surface Flows,” ASME Paper 97-GT-455.
Simon, T. W., Qiu, S., and Yuan, K., 2000, “Measurements in a Transitional Boundary Layer Under Low-Pressure Turbine Conditions,” NASA/CR-2000-209957.
Brunner, S., Fottner, L., and Schiffer, H.-P., 2000, “Comparison of Two Highly Loaded Low Pressure Turbine Cascades Under the Influence of Wake-Induced Transition,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-268.
Stadtmüller, P., Fottner, L., and Fiala, A., 2000, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Wake-Induced Transition on a Highly Loaded LP Turbine at Low Reynolds Numbers,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0269.
Howell,  R. J., Ramesh,  O. N., Hodson,  H. P., Harvey,  N. W., and Schulte,  V., 2001, “High Lift and Aft-Loaded Profiles for Low-Pressure Turbines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123, pp. 181–188.
Kaszeta, R. W., Simon, T. W., and Ashpis, D. E., 2001, “Experimental Investigation of Transition to Turbulence as Affected by Passing Wakes,” ASME Paper 2001-GT-195.
Dorney, D. J., Ashpis, D. E., Halstead, D. E., and Wisler, D. C., 1999, “Study of Boundary Layer Development in a Two-Stage Low Pressure Turbine,” AIAA Paper 99-0742; also NASA TM-1999-208913.
Chernobrovkin,  A., and Lakshminarayana,  B., 1999, “Turbulence Modeling and Computation of Viscous Transitional Flow for Low Pressure Turbines,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 121, pp. 824–833.
Huang, P. G., and Xiong, G., 1998, “Transition and Turbulence Modeling of Low Pressure Turbine Flows,” AIAA Paper 98-0339.
Thermann, H., Müller, M., and Niehuis, R., 2001, “Numerical Simulation of the Boundary Layer Transition in Turbomachinery Flows,” ASME Paper 2001-GT-0475.
VanTreuren, K. W., Simon, T., von Koller, M., Byerley, A. R., Baughn, J. W., and Rivir, R., 2001, “Measurements in a Turbine Cascade Flow Under Ultra Low Reynolds Number Conditions,” ASME Paper 2001-GT-0164.
Lake, J. P., King, P. I., and Rivir, R. B., 2000, “Low Reynolds Number Loss Reduction on Turbine Blades With Dimples and V-Grooves,” AIAA Paper 00-738.
Bons,  J. P., Sondergaard,  R., and Rivir,  R. B., 2001, “Turbine Separation Control Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123, pp. 198–206.
Volino,  R. J., 2002, “Separated Flow Transition under Simulated Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions: Part 2—Turbulence Spectra,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124, pp. 656–664.
Volino, R. J., Schultz, M. P., and Pratt, C. M., 2001, “Conditional Sampling in a Transitional Boundary Layer Under High Free-Stream Turbulence Conditions,” ASME Paper 2001-GT-0192.
Chung, J. T., and Simon, T. W., 1990, “Three-Dimensional Flow Near the Blade/Endwall Junction of a Gas Turbine: Visualization in a Large-Scale Cascade Simulator,” ASME Paper 90-WA/HT-4.
Aunapu,  N. V., Volino,  R. J., Flack,  K. A., and Stoddard,  R. M., 2000, “Secondary Flow Measurements in a Turbine Passage With Endwall Flow Modification,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122, pp. 651–658.
Volino,  R. J., and Simon,  T. W., 1997, “Velocity and Temperature Profiles in Turbulent Boundary Layers Experiencing Streamwise Pressure Gradients,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 119, pp. 433–439.
Wills,  J. A. B., 1962, “The Correction of Hot-Wire Readings for Proximity to a Solid Boundary,” J. Fluid Mech., 12, pp. 65–92.
Ligrani,  P. M., and Bradshaw,  P., 1987, “Spatial Resolution and Measurement of Turbulence in the Viscous Sublayer Using Subminiature Hot-Wire Probes,” Exp. Fluids, 5, pp. 407–417.
Ligrani,  P. M., and Bradshaw,  P., 1987, “Subminiature Hot-Wire Sensors: Development and Use,” J. Phys. E, 20, pp. 323–332.
Ligrani,  P. M., Westphal,  R. V., and Lemos,  F. R., 1989, “Fabrication and Testing of Subminiature Multi-Sensor Hot-Wire Probes,” J. Phys. E, 22, pp. 262–268.
Bradshaw,  P., 1994, “Turbulence: the Chief Outstanding Difficulty of Our Subject,” Exp. Fluids, 16, pp. 203–216.
Volino, R. J., 2002, “An Investigation of the Scales in Transitional Boundary Layers Under High Free-Stream Turbulence Conditions,” ASME Paper GT-2002-30233.
Thwaites,  B., 1949, “Approximate Calculations of the Laminar Boundary Layer,” Aeronaut. Q., 7, pp. 245–280.
Davis, R. L., Carter, J. E., and Reshotko, E., 1985, “Analysis of Transitional Separation Bubbles on Infinite Swept Wings,” AIAA Paper 85-1685.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the test section
Grahic Jump Location
Cp profiles: (a) low FSTI, (b) high FSTI
Grahic Jump Location
Mean velocity profiles from Station 1–5, all cases
Grahic Jump Location
Skin friction coefficients from Station 1–6, all cases
Grahic Jump Location
Boundary layer u profiles from Stations 1–5—(a) low FSTI cases, (b) high FSTI cases
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for low FSTI, Re=25,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for low FSTI, Re=50,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for low FSTI, Re=100,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for low FSTI, Re=200,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for low FSTI, Re=300,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for high FSTI, Re=25,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency, (e) v
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for high FSTI, Re=50,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for high FSTI, Re=100,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for high FSTI, Re=200,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Station 6–11 profiles for high FSTI, Re=300,000 case—(a) mean velocity, (b) u, (c) −uv, (d) intermittency
Grahic Jump Location
Shape factor at Station 11
Grahic Jump Location
Momentum thickness at Station 11

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In