0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Predictions of Separated and Transitional Boundary Layers Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions Using an Intermittency Transport Equation

[+] Author and Article Information
Y. B. Suzen, P. G. Huang

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0503

Lennart S. Hultgren, David E. Ashpis

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, Cleveland, OH 44135

J. Turbomach 125(3), 455-464 (Aug 27, 2003) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1580159 History: Received July 09, 2001; Revised March 10, 2003; Online August 27, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Mayle,  R. E., 1991, “The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 113, pp. 509–537.
Rivir, R. B., 1996, “Transition on Turbine Blades and Cascades at Low Reynolds Numbers,” AIAA Pap., AIAA-96-2079.
Lake, J. P., King, P. I., and Rivir, R. B., 2000, “Low Reynolds Number Loss Reduction on Turbine Blades With Dimples and V-Grooves,” AIAA Pap., AIAA-00-0738.
Wisler, D. C., 1998, “The Technical and Economic Relevance of Understanding Boundary Layer Transition in Gas Turbine Engines,” Minnowbrook II-1997 Workshop on Boundary Layer Transition in Turbomachines, eds., J. E. LaGraff and D. E. Ashpis, NASA CP-1998-206958, pp. 53–64.
Savill, A. M., 1993, “Some Recent Progress in the Turbulence Modeling of By-pass Transition,” Near-Wall Turbulent Flows, eds., R. M. C. So, C. G. Speziale, and B. E. Launder, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., pp. 829–848.
Savill, A. M., 1993, “Further Progress in The Turbulence Modeling of By-pass Transition,” Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Experiments 2, eds., W. Rodi and F. Martelli, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., pp. 583–592.
Westin,  K. J. A., and Henkes,  R. A. W. M., 1997, “Application of Turbulence Models to Bypass Transition,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 119, pp. 859–866.
Dhawan,  S., and Narasimha,  R., 1958, “Some Properties of Boundary Layer During the Transition From Laminar to Turbulent Flow Motion,” J. Fluid Mech., 3, pp. 418–436.
Gostelow,  J. P., Blunden,  A. R., and Walker,  G. J., 1994, “Effects of Free-Stream Turbulence and Adverse Pressure Gradients on Boundary Layer Transition,” ASME J. Turbomach., 116, pp. 392–404.
Solomon, W. J., Walker, G. J., and Gostelow, J. P., 1995, “Transition Length Prediction for Flows With Rapidly Changing Pressure Gradients,” ASME Paper ASME-95-GT-241.
Chen,  K. K., and Thyson,  N. A., 1971, “Extension of Emmons’ Spot Theory to Flows on Blunt Bodies,” AIAA J., 9(5), pp. 821–825.
Steelant,  J., and Dick,  E., 1996, “Modelling of Bypass Transition With Conditioned Navier-Stokes Equations Coupled to an Intermittency Transport Equation,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 23, pp. 193–220.
Cho,  J. R., and Chung,  M. K., 1992, “A k−ε−γ Equation Turbulence Model,” J. Fluid Mech., 237, pp. 301–322.
Suzen, Y. B., and Huang, P. G., 1999, “Modelling of Flow Transition Using an Intermittency Transport Equation,” NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR-1999-209313.
Simon, T. W., Qiu, S., and Yuan, K., 2000, “Measurements in a Transitional Boundary Layer Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions,” NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR-2000-209957.
Suzen,  Y. B., and Huang,  P. G., 2000, “Modelling of Flow Transition Using an Intermittency Transport Equation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 122, pp. 273–284.
Suzen,  Y. B., Xiong,  G., and Huang,  P. G., 2002, “Predictions of Transitional Flows in Low-Pressure Turbines Using an Intermittency Transport Equation,” AIAA J., 40(2), pp. 254–266.
Hultgren, L. S., and Volino, R. J., 2000, “Separated and Transitional Boundary Layers Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions,” NASA TM, in preparation.
Volino, R. J., and Hultgren, L. S., 2000, “Measurements in Separated and Transitional Boundary Layers Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions,” ASME/IGTI Paper 2000-GT-0260.
Simon, F. F., and Stephens, C. A., 1991, “Modeling of the Heat Transfer in Bypass Transitional Boundary-Layer Flows,” NASA Technical Paper 3170.
Huang, P. G., and Coakley, T. J., 1992, “An Implicit Navier-Stokes Code for Turbulent Flow Modeling,” AIAA Pap., AIAA-92-0547.
Menter,  F. R., 1994, “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA J., 32(8), pp. 1598–1605.
Abu-Ghannam,  B. J., and Shaw,  R., 1980, “Natural Transition of Boundary Layers-The Effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient, and Flow History,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 22(5), pp. 213–228.
Roberts,  W. B., 1980, “Calculation of Laminar Separation Bubbles and Their Effect on Airfoil Performance,” AIAA J., 18(1), pp. 25–31.
Davis,  R. L., Carter,  J. E., and Reshotko,  E., 1987, “Analysis of Transitional Separation Bubbles on Infinite Swept Wings,” AIAA J., 25(3), pp. 421–428.
Lake, J. P., 1999, “Flow Separation Prevention on a Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Number,” Ph.D. dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Prediction of experiment of Hultgren and Volino 18—Re=50,000, FSTI=0.2%
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of intermittency profiles along the surface—Re=50,000, FSTI=0.2%
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of turbulence intensity profiles along the surface—Re=50,000, FSTI=0.2%
Grahic Jump Location
Onset of separated flow transition
Grahic Jump Location
Onset of separated flow transition with new correlation (Eq. 12)
Grahic Jump Location
Prediction of experiment of Hultgren and Volino 18—Re=50,000, FSTI=7%
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of intermittency profiles along the surface—Re=50,000, FSTI=7%
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of turbulence intensity profiles along the surface—Re=50,000, FSTI=7%
Grahic Jump Location
Prediction of experiment of Hultgren and Volino 18—Re=300,000, FSTI=0.2%
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of intermittency profiles along the surface—Re=300,000, FSTI=0.2%
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of turbulence intensity profiles along the surface—Re=300,000, FSTI=0.2%
Grahic Jump Location
Streamlines from experimental data, Re=300,000, FSTI=7%
Grahic Jump Location
Outer boundary shapes for all cases
Grahic Jump Location
Overall view of effects of Reynolds number and freestream turbulence intensity
Grahic Jump Location
Prediction of experiment of Hultgren and Volino 18—Re=300,000, FSTI=7%
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of intermittency profiles along the surface—Re=300,000, FSTI=7%
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of turbulence intensity profiles along the surface—Re=300,000, FSTI=7%

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In