0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Analysis of the Worst Mistuning Patterns in Bladed Disk Assemblies

[+] Author and Article Information
E. P. Petrov, D. J. Ewins

Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, Center of Vibration Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2BX, UK

J. Turbomach 125(4), 623-631 (Dec 01, 2003) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1622710 History: Received December 01, 2000; Revised March 01, 2001; Online December 01, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Forced response of each from 26 blades of the fan bladed disk: (a) the case of tuned blades; (b) the case of mistuned blades
Grahic Jump Location
Finite element model and active nodes: (a) a bladed disk; (b) a sector of the bladed disk
Grahic Jump Location
Correspondence calculated between the mistuning coefficient and frequency mistuning
Grahic Jump Location
Natural frequencies of a tuned bladed fan disk and the analyzed frequency range
Grahic Jump Location
Dependence the envelope of maximum response M on mistuning parameter variation for two blades of the assembly
Grahic Jump Location
Increase of the maximum amplitude with the number of iteration for the optimization search starting from different initial configurations and for random search
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of initial and worst mistuning patterns (circles) and amplitude distributions (triangles) for two of the optimization searches
Grahic Jump Location
Initial and found worst mistuning patterns, (a); maximum amplitude distributions corresponding to these patterns, (b); sensitivity coefficients, (c); an envelope of maximum amplitudes calculated for the patterns, (d).
Grahic Jump Location
A quarter of the high-pressure turbine bladed disk analyzed (a); and the active nodes chosen (b)
Grahic Jump Location
Natural frequencies of a tuned bladed high-pressure turbine disk and the analyzed frequency range
Grahic Jump Location
Increase of the maximum amplitude with the number of iteration for the optimization and random search
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of amplitude distributions (a); mistuning patterns (b); and sensitivity coefficients for initial and the found worst mistuning pattern (c)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of results obtained with different numbers of active nodes: (a) increase of the maximum amplitude with the number of iteration; (b) worst amplitude distribution; (c) worst mistuning pattern

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In