0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

A Comparative Study of Two Transition Zone Models in Heat Transfer Predictions

[+] Author and Article Information
P. M. Byvaltsev

First Department, Mechanical Engineering Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., 502 Kandatsu, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki 300-0013, Japane-mail: petr@merl.Hitachi.co.jp

K. Kawaike

Gas Turbine Department, Power and Industrial Systems R&D Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., 832-2 Horiguchi, Hitachinaka, Ibaraki 312-0034, Japane-mail: kazuhiko_kawaike@pis.Hitachi.co.jp

J. Turbomach 127(1), 230-239 (Feb 09, 2005) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1731446 History: Received October 15, 2003; Revised November 09, 2003; Online February 09, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Mach number distributions in flat-plate test cases
Grahic Jump Location
Flat plate: Tu=8.7%,K=0. Computed and measured Stanton number distributions.
Grahic Jump Location
Flat plate: Tu=2.3%,K=0 and K=var. Predictions corresponding to the JKMM and CSM.
Grahic Jump Location
Flat plate. Predictions made by the SWGM.
Grahic Jump Location
Flat plate. Predictions made by the BNM.
Grahic Jump Location
C3X vane. Comparison of results obtained using the JKM and JKMM.
Grahic Jump Location
VKI blade. Predictions made by the BNM.
Grahic Jump Location
VKI blade. Predictions made by the SWGM.
Grahic Jump Location
VKI vane. Predictions made by the SWGM and BNM.
Grahic Jump Location
SNECMA RS1S profile. Predictions made by the SWGM and BNM.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In