0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Latticework (Vortex) Cooling Effectiveness: Rotating Channel Experiments

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Acharya, F. Zhou, J. Lagrone, G. Mahmood

 Turbine Innovation and Energy Research (TIER) Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803

R. S. Bunker

 General Electric Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY 12309

J. Turbomach 127(3), 471-478 (Mar 01, 2004) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1860381 History: Received October 01, 2003; Revised March 01, 2004

The heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of latticework coolant blade passages have been investigated experimentally under conditions of rotation. Stationary studies with the latticework configuration have shown potential advantages including spatially-uniform streamwise distributions of the heat transfer coefficient, greater blade strength, and enhancement levels comparable to conventional rib turbulators. In the present study, a latticework coolant passage, with orthogonal-ribs, is studied in a rotating heat transfer test-rig for a range of Reynolds numbers (Res), Rotation numbers (Ros), and density ratios. Measurements indicate that for Res20,000, the latticework coolant passage provides very uniform streamwise distributions of the Nusselt number (Nus) with enhancement levels (relative to smooth-channel values) in the range of 2.0–2.5. No significant dependence of Nus on Ros and density ratio is observed except at lower Res values (10,000). Nusselt numbers are highest immediately downstream of a turn indicating that bend-effects play a major role in enhancing heat transfer. Friction factors are relatively insensitive to Ros, and thermal performance factors at higher Res values appear to be comparable to those obtained with conventional rib-turbulators. The present study indicates that latticework cooling geometry can provide comparable heat transfer enhancements and thermal performance factors as conventional rib-turbulators, with potential benefits of streamwise uniformity in the heat transfer coefficients and added blade strength.

Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Lattice geometry and flow paths

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Test Model (leading side)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Lattice element details (all dimensions in cm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Channel-averaged Nusselt numbers as a function of Res

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Channel-averaged Nusselt numbers as a function of Ros

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Nusselt number distributions on individual rows for stationary channel

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Streamwise-averaged Nusselt numbers for stationary channel

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Spanwise average Nusselt numbers for stationary channel

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Spanwise average Nusselt numbers at Ros=0.012

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Rotation effects on the individual rows at Res=20k

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Rotation effects at Res=35k

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Rotation effects at Res=5k

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Nusselt number averaged over the whole channel versus DR (Res=10k)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Density ratio effects at Ros=0.04 and Res=10k

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Friction factors at different (a) Ros and (b) Res

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Thermal performance factor

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In