Unsteady Flow Interactions Within the Inlet Cavity of a Turbine Rotor Tip Labyrinth Seal

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Pfau

 Turbomachinery Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerlanda.pfau@freesurf.ch

J. Schlienger, D. Rusch, A. I. Kalfas, R. S. Abhari

 Turbomachinery Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

J. Turbomach 127(4), 679-688 (Mar 01, 2003) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2008973 History: Received December 01, 2002; Revised March 01, 2003

This paper focuses on the flow within the inlet cavity of a turbine rotor tip labyrinth seal of a two stage axial research turbine. Highly resolved, steady and unsteady three-dimensional flow data are presented. The probes used here are a miniature five-hole probe of 0.9 mm head diameter and the novel virtual four sensor fast response aerodynamic probe (FRAP) with a head diameter of 0.84mm. The cavity flow itself is not only a loss producing area due to mixing and vortex stretching, it also adversely affects the following rotor passage through the fluid that is spilled into the main flow. The associated fluctuating mass flow has a relatively low total pressure and results in a negative incidence to the rotor tip blade profile section. The dominating kinematic flow feature in the region between cavity and main flow is a toroidal vortex, which is swirling at high circumferential velocity. It is fed by strong shear and end wall fluid from the pressure side of the stator passage. The static pressure field interaction between the moving rotor leading edges and the stator trailing edges is one driving force of the cavity flow. It forces the toroidal vortex to be stretched in space and time. A comprehensive flow model including the drivers of this toroidal vortex is proposed. This labyrinth seal configuration results in about 1.6% turbine efficiency reduction. This is the first in a series of papers focusing on turbine loss mechanisms in shrouded axial turbines. Additional measurements have been made with variations in seal clearance gap. Initial indications show that variation in the gap has a major effect on flow structures and turbine loss.

Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Locations of measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Pitch wise averaged results

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Time sequence of total pressure Cpo[−], Z=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Time sequence of tangential vorticity Ωθ[−], Z=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Flow model: Side and above view

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Vortex relative system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Cross section of the test geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Vorticity components at C=0.25

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Circumferential vorticity Ωθ[−]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Vorticity and radial position of the toroidal vortex

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Stations of mass flow integration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Time averaged relative total pressure Cporel[−] rotor relative, Z=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Time averaged relative tangential velocity vθrel[−] rotor relative, Z=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Time averaged static pressure Cp[−] rotor relative, Z=0.83

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Time averaged radial velocity vr[−] rotor relative, Z=0.83

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

a) Total pressure Cpo[−], b) Static pressure Cp[−]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Radial velocity vr[−], R=1 (tip radius)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In