0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Aerodesign and Testing of an Aeromechanically Highly Loaded LP Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
F. J. Malzacher, J. Gier, F. Lippl

 MTU Aero Engines, 80995 München, Germany

J. Turbomach 128(4), 643-649 (Dec 19, 2003) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2172646 History: Received November 10, 2003; Revised December 19, 2003

Future turbo systems for aircraft engines need very compact geometry, low weight, and high efficiency components. The geared turbofan enables the engine designer to decouple the speed of the fan and the LP turbine to combine a low speed fan with a high speed LP turbine. The low pressure turbine is a key component for this concept. The technological challenge is very much driven by the very high low-spool speed. Resulting as well from high inlet temperatures, the LP turbine needs cooling of the first stage. A new MTU LPT concept for such a high speed turbine has been developed and tested in a turbine rig. The concept consists of a two-stage turbine for extremely high speed and high stage pressure ratio (ER 2.3). This leads to extra high mechanical loading and an exotic combination of high Mach numbers (transonic) and very low Reynolds numbers. In this paper some design features are described. Some elements of the airfoil design were also tested in additional cascade tests. The two-stage turbine was tested at the Altitude Test Facility of the ILA, Stuttgart. The test setup is described including details of the instrumentation. Test data shows a good turbine performance. Measurements are also compared to 3D CFD, which is used to analyze local effects.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

LP turbine aero loading pressure ratio versus stage count

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Exotic combination of Mach and Reynolds numbers in the last blade

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

LP turbine mechanical loading

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Smith loading diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Relation efficiency=f (speed; blade height)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Side view of second blade with area taper

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Comparison of typical pressure distributions for conventional LPT, high speed LPT, and HPT

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Measured and computed airfoil pressure distribution in the T132 cascade at nominal conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison of Schlieren picture (experiment) and numerical solution of T132, Re2th≈60,000; Maex≈0.8; Tuin≈1.5%

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Cascade T133 Schlieren picture (density), Re2th≈65,000; Maex>1.0; Tuin≈1.5%

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Test facility with installed cold flow rig

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Test rig with measurement positions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Turbine characteristic for several speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Pressure distribution on vane 2 mid-span

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Flow visualization for second vane, comparison of color injection, and numerical simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Normalized cavity pressures measurement versus 3D CFD

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

LP turbine 3D-CFD model including cavities

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

LP turbine component radial efficiency distribution with and without cavities (1mm radial clearance)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In