0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Preliminary Fan Design for a Silent Aircraft

[+] Author and Article Information
Daniel Crichton, Liping Xu, Cesare A. Hall

 Whittle Laboratory, Department of Engineering, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DY, United Kingdom

J. Turbomach 129(1), 184-191 (Feb 01, 2006) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2372779 History: Received October 01, 2005; Revised February 01, 2006

Preliminary fan design for a functionally silent aircraft has been performed with noise reduction as the primary goal. For such an aircraft the fan design must, in addition to delivering low cruise fuel burn, enable low jet and fan source noise during takeoff. This requires the fan to be operating at low pressure ratio and high efficiency during takeoff and, for conditions where the relative tip Mach number onto the fan is supersonic, ensuring the primary shock structure is ingested into the blade passage. To meet these requirements, flyover and cruise flow coefficients are matched using a variable area nozzle at the same time as delivering low takeoff FPR. This places the sideline operating point near the shoulder of the characteristic and fixes the top of climb and cruise fan pressure ratios. For a 4-engine, 250pax, 4000nm silent aircraft this approach leads to a top of climb FPR of 1.45, requiring a 39% increase in nozzle area at takeoff. A fan rotor has been designed for this cycle with 20 blades, low tip loading during takeoff, and a 350ms top of climb tip speed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Reduction in thrust corrected aircraft noise level over time

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Takeoff profile optimization for jet noise outside airport boundary (10000ft runway, airport boundary 450m at the sideline and 1000m from the end of the runway at flyover, sea level ISA+12K conditions)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Reduction in the required jet area achieved through optimization of the takeoff profile for different peak jet noise requirements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

FPR for a fixed nozzle engine at key operating points for a 250pax, 4000nm aircraft. Four-engine embedded variant=solid black lines, two-engine podded variant=dashed grey lines. (This distinction between the two aircraft variants is followed in the remaining plots.)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Required nozzle variation to meet both top of climb FPR and takeoff jet noise requirements for two aircraft variants

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Top of climb FPR uniquely defined by specifying flyover FPR, fan capacity, and matching flow coefficient at flyover and cruise

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Required top of climb FPR and nozzle opening at takeoff relative to top of climb to match φ at flyover and cruise conditions for two aircraft variants

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Required top of climb fan blade speed to meet Mrel@tip=1 at specified conditions for two aircraft variants

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Fan characteristic showing lines of fan speed relative to the design point and contours of rotor only polytropic efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Radial variations in fan pressure ratio and inlet flow coefficient for key operating conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Contours of the relative Mach number at 95% and 75% span when operating at the sideline position

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Swirl and absolute Mach number onto OGVs at key operating points

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In