0
Research Papers

Fully Automated Model-Based Performance Analysis Procedure for On-Line and Off-Line Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael Bauer, Stephan Staudacher

 MTU Aero Engines GmbH, Dachauer Str. 665, Munich 80995, Germany University of Stuttgart, Institute for Aircraft Propulsion Systems (ILA), Stuttgart 70569, Germany

J. Turbomach 130(1), 011007 (Dec 19, 2007) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2720875 History: Received August 18, 2006; Revised September 07, 2006; Published December 19, 2007

The development of modern gas turbines is accompanied by an extensive prototype testing. To evaluate performance, the engines are fitted with a substantial number of sensors measuring pressures, temperatures, shaft speeds, etc. The test data are analyzed by procedures calculating data that are not directly measured, e.g., component efficiencies and turbine temperatures. Engine manufacturers usually apply such procedures for a detailed analysis after the test (off-line) as well as to ensure a safe and efficient engine operation during the test (on-line). Especially for the latter application, a fast and reliable assessment of the performance of the engine and its components as well as a fast and reliable detection of measurement faults are required. The paper describes a fully automated performance analysis procedure for off-line as well as on-line applications. The basis of the procedure is a full thermodynamic model representing the expected behavior of the engine to be tested. By such a model-based analysis procedure, a comparison between test data and the expected engine behavior is performed. The way the comparison is done allows detecting and isolating measurement faults and component malfunctions. In case of a detected measurement fault, the measurement will be excluded automatically from the analysis. At MTU Aero Engines GmbH the procedure is regularly applied for on-line and off-line test data analysis of different engine types. Compared to the procedures used thus far, many measurement faults can be detected quickly and reliably.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Application of performance analysis procedures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Module arrangement for a given engine configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

General arrangement of a two-spool mixed-flow afterburner turbofan engine including typical instrumentation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Coarse filter and fine filter

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Measurement check and determination of estimation values

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Typical deviations between measurement and expectation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Automatic use of a valid ANSYN scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Test-bed integration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

On-line visualization of calculated data

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Detection of a measurement fault

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Measurement check during an engine acceleration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

On-line visualization of derived modifiers

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In