0
Research Papers

Correlative Analysis of Effusion Cooling Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Lorenzo Arcangeli, Bruno Facchini, Lorenzo Tarchi

Department of Energy Engineering “Sergio Stecco,” University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy

Marco Surace

Department of Energy Engineering “Sergio Stecco,” University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italymarco.surace@htc.de.unifi.it

J. Turbomach 130(1), 011016 (Jan 28, 2008) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2749298 History: Received May 18, 2006; Revised December 04, 2006; Published January 28, 2008

Gas turbine cooling has steadily acquired major importance whenever engine performances have to be improved. Among various cooling techniques, film cooling is probably one of the most diffused systems for protecting metal surfaces against hot gases in turbine stages and combustor liners. Most recent developments in hole manufacturing allow us to perform a wide array of microholes, currently referred to as effusion cooling. Though some drawbacks of such a concept still need to be solved (manufacturing costs, holes blockage, and then system reliability), its potential is now worth investigating. This paper presents the validation of a simplified numerical two-dimensional conjugate approach through a comparison with the experimental results of effectiveness for an effusion plate. A preliminary test is performed with the steady-state technique, using thermochromic liquid crystal wide-band formulations. Results are obtained in terms of local distributions of adiabatic effectiveness. Average values are compared with calculations to validate the numerical code. Then, the design of experiment approach is used to perform several conjugate numerical tests (about 180), so as to derive the behavior of different effusion plates in terms of overall effectiveness and mass flow rate. Data are analyzed in detail, and a correlative approach for the overall effectiveness is proposed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Adiabatic effectiveness map over the effusion plate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Spanwise average adiabatic effectiveness comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Actual and proposed configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Iterative procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Overall effectiveness of performed tests as a function of coolant mass flow rate, with reference to the length to diameter ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Adiabatic effectiveness of performed tests as a function of coolant mass flow rate, with reference to the length to diameter ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Blowing ratio variation for all performed runs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Comparison between the best configurations of microholes and conventional holes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Correlation of obtained results

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In