Research Papers

Experimental Validation of Quasisteady Assumption in Modeling of Unsteady Film-Cooling

[+] Author and Article Information
Stefan Bernsdorf

 MAN TURBO, Hardstrasse 319, CH-8023 Zürich, Switzerland

Martin G. Rose, Reza S. Abhari

Institute of Energy Technologies, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology-ETHZ, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland

J. Turbomach 130(1), 011022 (Jan 28, 2008) (12 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2720878 History: Received September 11, 2006; Revised October 30, 2006; Published January 28, 2008

This paper reports on the validation of the assumption of quasisteady behavior of pulsating cooling injection in the near hole flow region. The respective experimental data are taken in a flat plate wind tunnel at ETH Zürich. The facility simulates the film cooling row flow field on the pressure side of a turbine blade. Engine representative nondimensionals are achieved, providing a faithful model at a larger scale. Heating the free stream air and strongly cooling the coolant gives the required density ratio between coolant and free-stream. The coolant is injected with different frequency and amplitude. The three-dimensional velocities are recorded using nonintrusive PIV, and seeding is provided for both air streams. Two different cylindrical hole geometries are studied, with different angles. Blowing ratio is varied over a range to simulate pressure side film cooling. The general flow field, the jet trajectory, and the streamwise circulation are utilized in the validation of the quasisteady assumption.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic of the test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Sketch of the test section

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Definition of the coordinates and dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Schematic of the injection arrangement

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Mounting of the PIV system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

BR variation for periodic cooling injection

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Velocity field at X=4, case 1 and case 11, phase 4∕12

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Velocity field at X=4, case 1 and case 11, phase average

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Velocity field at X=4, case 7 and case 14-phase 0∕12

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Velocity field at X=4, case 7 and case 14-phase average

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Velocity field at X=4, case 3 and case 11-phase 1∕12

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Time resolved isovelocity contour for case 11

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Comparison between new correlation and unsteady experimental data

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Trajectory at maximum and minimum blowing ratio for α=30deg, BR=1, fr=0.38

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Comparison between the new correlation and unsteady experimental data

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Trajectory at the maximum and minimum blowing ratio for 50deg, BR=1, fr=1.88

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Illustration of the area of circulation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

Typical circulation of the kidney vortex

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 19

Influence of pulsating on the axial circulation; α=50deg, DR=1.0, BR=1.0




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In