Research Papers

A Comparative Investigation of Round and Fan-Shaped Cooling Hole Near Flow Fields

[+] Author and Article Information
James S. Porter, Jane E. Sargison, Gregory J. Walker, Alan D. Henderson

School of Engineering, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001, Australia

J. Turbomach 130(4), 041020 (Aug 04, 2008) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2812952 History: Received June 19, 2007; Revised July 03, 2007; Published August 04, 2008

This study presents velocity and turbulence data measured experimentally in the near field of a round and a laterally expanded fan-shaped cooling hole. Both holes are fed by a plenum inlet, and interact with a turbulent mainstream boundary layer. Flow is Reynolds number matched to engine conditions to preserve flow structure, and two coolant to mainstream blowing momentum ratios are investigated experimentally. Results clearly identify regions of high shear for the round hole as the jet penetrates into the mainstream. In contrast, the distinct lack of high shear regions for the fan-shaped hole points to reasons for improvements in cooling performance noted by previous studies. Two different computational fluid dynamics codes are used to predict the flow within and downstream of the fan-shaped hole, with validation from the experimental measurements. One code is the commercially available ANSYS CFX 10.0 , and the other is the density-based solver with low Mach number preconditioning, HYDRA , developed in-house by Rolls-Royce plc for high speed turbomachinery flows. Good agreement between numerical and experimental data for the center-line traverses was obtained for a steady state solution, and a region of reversed flow within the expansion region of the fan-shaped hole was identified.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Working section and cooling hole with plenum supply

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Hole geometries: (a) round hole and (b) laterally expanded hole

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Contour plot of deviation from pure x-direction flow for the fan-shaped hole. Angle is measured anticlockwise.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Centerline velocity (a) and turbulence intensity (b) profiles for the round hole geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Centerline velocity (a) and turbulence intensity (b) profiles for the fan-shaped hole geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Comparison of velocity profiles for different hole inlet conditions (round hole)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Computational mesh (∼500,000 cells)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Comparison of centerline velocity profiles from experiment, HYDRA , and CFX for fan-shaped hole

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison of centerline turbulence intensity profiles from experiment and CFX for fan-shaped hole

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Comparison of in-hole streamlines for (a) CFX and (b) HYDRA

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Near hole region streamlines: (a) HYDRA and (b) CFX




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In