Research Papers

Extended Models for Transitional Rough Wall Boundary Layers With Heat Transfer—Part I: Model Formulations

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Stripf, A. Schulz, H.-J. Bauer, S. Wittig

Lehrstuhl und Institut für Thermische Strömungsmaschinen, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Kaiserstraße 12, Karlsruhe 76128, Germany

J. Turbomach 131(3), 031016 (Apr 20, 2009) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2992511 History: Received June 20, 2008; Revised August 05, 2008; Published April 20, 2009

Two extended models for the calculation of rough wall transitional boundary layers with heat transfer are presented. Both models comprise a new transition onset correlation, which accounts for the effects of roughness height and density, turbulence intensity, and wall curvature. In the transition region, an intermittency equation suitable for rough wall boundary layers is used to blend between the laminar and fully turbulent states. Finally, two different submodels for the fully turbulent boundary layer complete the two models. In the first model, termed KS-TLK-T in this paper, a sand roughness approach from Durbin (2001, “Rough Wall Modification of Two Layer k-ε  ,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 123, pp. 16–21), which builds upon a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model, is used for this purpose. The second model, the so-called DEM-TLV-T model, makes use of the discrete-element roughness approach, which was recently combined with a two-layer k-ε-turbulence model by the present authors. The discrete-element model will be formulated in a new way, suitable for randomly rough topographies. Part I of the paper will provide detailed model formulations as well as a description of the database used for developing the new transition onset correlation. Part II contains a comprehensive validation of the two models, using a variety of test cases with transitional and fully turbulent boundary layers. The validation focuses on heat transfer calculations on both the suction and the pressure side of modern turbine airfoils. Test cases include extensive experimental investigations on a high-pressure turbine vane with varying surface roughness and turbulence intensity, recently published by the current authors as well as new experimental data from a low-pressure turbine vane. In the majority of cases, the predictions from both models are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Rough surface description for the DEM-TLV model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Roughness elements with flat tops

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Modeling bypass-transition with an intermittency factor describing the transition progress

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Correction function fΛ to account for different roughness densities

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison of predicted and measured momentum thickness Reynolds numbers at transition onset

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Transition onset on rough surfaces with roughness densities 4<ΛR<7 (Tueff-Reθ,t plane)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Transition onset on rough surfaces with roughness densities 4<ΛR<7 (k/δ1-Reθ,t plane)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

The discrete-element approach

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Smooth wall transition onset correlations





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In