Research Papers

Predictions of Turbulent Flow for the Impeller of a NASA Low-Speed Centrifugal Compressor

[+] Author and Article Information
K. M. Guleren1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, 58140, Turkeymelihguleren@cumhuriyet.edu.tr

I. Afgan

Institute of Avionics and Aeronautical Engineering, Air University, Sector E-9, Islamabad, 44200, Pakistan

A. Turan

School of MACE, University of Manchester, George Begg Building, Sackville Street, P.O. Box 88, Manchester, M60 1QD, UK


Corresponding author.

J. Turbomach 132(2), 021005 (Jan 11, 2010) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3140824 History: Received June 19, 2007; Revised February 06, 2008; Published January 11, 2010; Online January 11, 2010

The turbulent flow inside a low-speed centrifugal compressor at design condition is investigated using large-eddy simulation (LES) comprising of up to 26×106 computational volume cells. Unlike in the past, the current study’s special emphasis is placed on the turbulence field evolution inside the impeller. LES predictions suggest that the Boussinesq hypothesis does not seem to be valid, especially near the exit of the impeller where the blade unloading takes place. Reynolds stress variations show a tendency toward an “axisymmetric expansion” type of turbulence after the impeller exit for which the subgrid-scale stress contribution shows a monotonic decrease. Probability density function analysis for the leakage flow show that instantaneous velocities in the wake region are less intermittent as compared with those in the jet. Time spectra analysis display also another feature that the energy cascade proceeds at a higher rate and lasts longer in the wake region than in the tip jet region.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Three-dimensional view of the LSCC blade passage

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Coarse grid distribution on the meridional plane (a) and on the cross-sectional plane (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Time (a) and grid resolution (b) of LES study for LSCC

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Meridional velocity comparisons for LES cases at 50% (a) and at 90% (b) span form the hub

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Meridional velocity variation and reverse flow mechanism near the impeller exit: (a) 30% pitch from PS and (b) 50% pitch from the PS

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Normalized turbulent kinetic energy distribution at cross-sectional planes: mi/m=0.149 (a), mi/m=0.475 (b), mi/m=0.644 (c), and mi/m=0.921 (d)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Meridional velocity gradient (a), meridional normal stresses (b), and production of turbulence (c) at midpitch

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Turbulence intensity variation (left y-axis) shown with open symbols and contribution of SGS viscosity (right y-axis) shown with filled symbols

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Reynolds stress anisotropy variation




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In