0
Research Papers

Axial Transonic Rotor and Stage Behavior Near the Stability Limit

[+] Author and Article Information
Anthony J. Gannon

Department of MAE, Naval Postgraduate School, 700 Dyer Road, RM 245, Monterey, CA 92943ajgannon@nps.edu

Garth V. Hobson

Department of MAE, Naval Postgraduate School, 700 Dyer Road, RM 245, Monterey, CA 92943gvhobson@nps.edu

William L. Davis

Department of MAE, Naval Postgraduate School, 700 Dyer Road, RM 245, Monterey, CA 92943william.l.davis@uscg.mil

J. Turbomach 134(1), 011009 (May 26, 2011) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4003225 History: Received September 01, 2010; Revised September 07, 2010; Published May 26, 2011; Online May 26, 2011

Transient casing pressure data from a transonic rotor and rotor-stator stage measured using high-speed pressure probes embedded in the casewall over the rotor tips are analyzed. Using long data sets sampled at a high frequency, low-frequency (less than once-per-revolution) nonaxisymmetric flow phenomena were detected while operating at steady-state conditions near stall. Both the rotor and stage cases are investigated, and the difference in behavior of a rotor with and without a stator blade row is investigated. Data for both cases over the speed range 70–100% of design and from choke to near the stability limit (stall or surge) are presented. The root mean square power of the low-frequency signal as well as its fraction of the total pressure signal is presented. It was thought that the behavior of these signals as stall was approached could lead to some method of detecting the proximity of stall. For the rotor-only configuration, the strength of these nonaxisymmetric phenomena increased as stall was approached for all speed-lines. However, for the stage configuration, more representative of an operational machine, these were of a lower magnitude and did not exhibit a clearly increasing trend as stall was approached. This would seem to indicate that the stator suppressed these signals somewhat. It is also shown that these nonaxisymmetric phenomena led to a significant variation of the mean relative inlet flow angle into the rotor blade. During stable operation near to stall at 100% speed for the rotor-only case, a 1.9 deg variation of this angle was measured. This compared with a 5.6 deg variation over the entire speed-line. Further, it was observed that while the rotor and stage cases had different stability limits, their peak relative inlet flow angles near stall were similar for both along most speed-lines.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Transonic test rotor-stator stage

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Rotor-only and stage stagnation pressure ratios

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

(a) Rotor-only and (b) stage isentropic efficiencies

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Rotor-only and stage rotor-tip relative inlet Mach numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Kulite high-speed pressure probe positions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Rotor-only 100% near stall wall pressure contours

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Rotor-only 100% speed spectral analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Filter performance and band-pass regions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Unfiltered and filtered pressure signal

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Filtered pressure signal

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Axial Mach number variation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

(a) Rotor-only and (b) stage axial Mach number peak variation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

(a) Rotor-only and (b) stage comparison of filtered signal magnitude and distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

(a) Rotor-only and (b) stage low-frequency rms powers

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

(a) Rotor-only and (b) stage total rms power

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

(a) Rotor-only and (b) stage low-frequency/total rms nondimensional

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 19

(a) Rotor-only and (b) stage maximum relative inlet angle

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

(a) Rotor-only and (b) stage mean-to-max relative inlet angle variation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Varying relative inlet flow angle

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In