0
Research Papers

Bend Geometries in Internal Cooling Channels for Improved Thermal Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
Sumanta Acharya

e-mail: acharya@tigers.lsu.edu
Turbine Innovation and Energy Research (TIER) Center,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 4, 2012; final manuscript received July 15, 2012; published online March 25, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(3), 031028 (Mar 25, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1128; doi: 10.1115/1.4007582 History: Received July 04, 2012; Revised July 15, 2012

The pressure drop and heat transfer in a two pass internal cooling channel with two different bend geometries is experimentally studied with the goal of improving the thermal performance factor (TPF) in the coolant channel. The geometries studied are (1) a baseline U-bend geometry with a rectangular divider wall, (2) a symmetrical bulb at the end of the divider wall, and (3) a combination of the symmetrical bulb and a bow on the opposite outer wall leading to a shaped flow contraction and expansion in the bend. Tests are conducted for four Reynolds number ranging from 10,000 to 55,000. The symmetrical bulb eliminates the separation due to the sharp turn and makes the heat transfer distribution in the bend portion more uniform. This modification reduces the bend pressure drop by 37% and augments the TPF by nearly 29% compared to the baseline case. The combination of bulb and bow case increases the local heat transfer in the bend region significantly, and reduces the bend pressure drop by nearly 27% leading to an augmentation of the TPF of 32% compared to the baseline case. These improvements in TPF point to the benefits of using the improved bend designs in internal cooling channels.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the bend geometries

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Nu/Nu0 contour map for the baseline case (Re = 25,000)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Streamline pattern at different planes perpendicular to the flow direction (baseline)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Nu/Nu0 contour map for the symmetrical bulb case (Re = 25,000)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Streamline pattern at different planes perpendicular to the flow direction (symmetrical bulb)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Nu/Nu0 contour map for the bulb-bow combination case (Re = 25,000)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Streamline pattern at different planes perpendicular to the flow direction (bow-bulb combination)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Zone averaged Nu/Nu0 for the configurations tested (Re = 25,000)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Total averaged Nu/Nu0 comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Total friction factor ratio

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In