0
Research Papers

Forced Response Analyses of Mistuned Radial Inflow Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
Thomas Giersch

Chair of Structural Mechanics and
Vehicle Vibration Technology,
e-mail: gierstho@tu-cottbus.de

Peter Hönisch

e-mail: hoenisch@tu-cottbus.de

Bernd Beirow

e-mail: beirow@tu-cottbus.de

Arnold Kühhorn

e-mail: kuehhorn@tu-cottbus.de
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus,
D-03046 Cottbus, Germany

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the Journal of Turbomachinery. Manuscript received July 31, 2012; final manuscript received August 15, 2012; published online March 25, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(3), 031034 (Mar 25, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1161; doi: 10.1115/1.4007512 History: Received July 31, 2012; Revised August 15, 2012

Radial turbine wheels designed as blade integrated disks (blisk) are widely used in various industrial applications. However, related to the introduction of exhaust gas turbochargers in the field of small and medium sized engines, a sustainable demand for radial turbine wheels has come along. Despite those blisks being state of the art, a number of fundamental problems, mainly referring to fluid-structure-interaction and, therefore, to the vibration behavior, have been reported. Aiming to achieve an enhanced understanding of fluid-structure-interaction in radial turbine wheels, a numerical method, able to predict forced responses of mistuned blisks due to aerodynamic excitation, is presented. In a first step, the unsteady aerodynamic forcing is determined by modeling the spiral casing, the stator vanes, and the rotor blades of the entire turbine stage. In a second step, the aerodynamic damping induced by blade vibration is computed using a harmonic balance technique. The structure itself is represented by a reduced order model being extended by aerodynamic damping effects and aerodynamic forcings. Mistuning is introduced by adjusting the modal stiffness matrix based on results of blade by blade measurements that have been performed at rest. In order to verify the numerical method, the results are compared with strain-gauge data obtained during rig-tests. As a result, a measured low engine order excitation was found by modeling the spiral casing. Furthermore, a localization phenomenon due to frequency mistuning could be proven. The predicted amplitudes are close to the measured data.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Modeled turbine stage: the black line represents the boundary of the rotor's sector mesh used for steady-state flow analyses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Nodal diameter map of the tuned FE model and chosen subset of nominal modes for the frequency range of interest. fmean is the mean value of all eigenfrequencies belonging to the first flap mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Undamped eigenfrequencies of the updated model and resonance frequencies of measurements at rest

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of measured and computed mode shapes at rest

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relative torsional moment and polytropic efficiency with respect to the measured data at 100% speed. Steady-state CFD results versus performance measurements.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Time history of relative modal forcing on tuned standing wave modes (first flap) with 6 nodal diameters. Values are divided by the amplitude of modal forcing of nodal diameter 2 (engine order 24).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Resulting nodal diameter versus exciting engine order. Rotating direction of traveling waves (BTW: backward traveling wave, FTW: forward traveling wave).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Average forcing on first flap blade-sector mode shape related to EO 24 excitation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Relative amplitudes of unsteady pressure (a) and interpolated first flap mode shape on CFD-grid (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Influence coefficients depending on vibrating blade 0 (first flap mode)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Aerodynamic damping determined for first flap mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Strain amplitude at s-g position measured data (a), calculated with material and predicted fluid-damping (b), calculated with measured overall-damping at fref (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Amplitude of operating deflection shape of maximum responding resonance at f=fref

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Blade individual maximum response frequencies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Aerodynamic damping determined for different vibration amplitudes (first flap mode)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Aerodynamic damping determined for different mass flows (first flap mode)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In