0
Research Papers

Large Eddy Simulations of Film-Cooling Flows With a Micro-Ramp Vortex Generator

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Pratap Vanka

Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
e-mail: spvanka@illinois.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) for the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received May 28, 2011; final manuscript received August 18, 2011; published online October 18, 2012. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(1), 011004 (Oct 18, 2012) (13 pages) Paper No: TURBO-11-1079; doi: 10.1115/1.4006329 History: Received May 28, 2011; Revised August 18, 2011

Large eddy simulations were performed to study the effect of a micro-ramp on an inclined turbulent jet interacting with a cross-flow in a film-cooling configuration. The micro-ramp vortex generator is placed downstream of the film-cooling jet. Changes in vortex structure and film-cooling effectiveness are evaluated. Coherent turbulent structures characteristic of a jet in a cross-flow are analyzed and the genesis of the counter-rotating vortex pair in the jet is discussed. Results are reported for two film-cooling configurations, where the primary difference is the way the jet inflow boundary conditions are prescribed. In the first configuration, the jet conditions are prescribed using a precursor simulation and in the second the jet is modeled using a plenum/pipe configuration. The latter configuration was designed based on previous wind tunnel experiments at NASA Glenn Research Center, and the present results are meant to supplement those experiments. It is found that the micro-ramp improves film-cooling effectiveness by generating near-wall counter-rotating vortices which help entrain coolant from the jet and transport it to the surface. The pair of vortices generated by the micro-ramp are of opposite sense to the vortex pair embedded in the jet.

© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational domains for film-cooling configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Instantaneous temperature at midspan (y/d = 0) for case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Instantaneous velocity magnitude at jet inflow (z/d=0) for case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Visualization of jet flow with no micro-ramp for case 1 using isosurface of instantaneous temperature at T* = 0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Centerline and span-averaged film-cooling effectiveness for case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Mean temperature at midspan (y/d = 0) for case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Contours of mean streamwise vorticity overlaid with streamlines at x/d = 3.7 for case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contours of mean temperature at x/d = 3.7 for case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Mean temperature along wall of domain (z/d = 0) for case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Vortex cores extracted from mean flow field for flow with no micro-ramp for case 1. Jet inflow perimeter is highlighted in red.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Predicted centerline film-cooling effectiveness for case 1 compared with DNS data from Muldoon and Acharya [10]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of instantaneous velocity magnitude at midspan (y/d = 0) for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Comparison of vortex core trajectories between the LES of case 2 and experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Mean velocity magnitude (a) and mean streamwise vorticity (b) at jet inflow (z/d = 0) for flow with no micro-ramp for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Instantaneous temperature at midspan (y/d = 0) for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Mean temperature at midspan (y/d = 0) for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Location of survey planes in near-field of jet for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Streamwise evolution of the jet CRVP for case 2. Mean streamwise vorticity and mean velocity vectors are shown at streamwise planes in the jet near-field.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Contours of mean streamwise vorticity overlaid with streamlines at x/d = 4 for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Contours of mean temperature at x/d = 4 for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Mean temperature along wall of domain (z/d = 0) for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Centerline and span-averaged film-cooling effectiveness for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Comparison of predicted mean boundary-layer profile for case 2 versus experiment at centerline of domain (y/d = 0)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In