0
Research Papers

The Influence of Leading Edge Diameter on Stagnation Region Heat Transfer Augmentation Including Effects of Turbulence Level, Scale, and Reynolds Number

[+] Author and Article Information
Preethi Gandavarapu

e-mail: preethi.gandavarapu@my.und.edu

Forrest E. Ames

e-mail: forrest.ames@engr.und.eduMechanical Engineering Department,
University of North Dakota,
243 Centennial Drive, Stop 8359,
Grand Forks, ND 58202-8359

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNALOF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 11, 2011; final manuscript received August 10, 2011; published online October 18, 2012. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(1), 011008 (Oct 18, 2012) (8 pages) Paper No: TURBO-11-1123; doi: 10.1115/1.4006396 History: Received July 11, 2011; Revised August 10, 2011

Stagnation region heat transfer measurements have been acquired on two large cylindrical leading edge test surfaces having a four to one range in leading edge diameter. Heat transfer measurements have been acquired for six turbulence conditions including three grid conditions, two aero-combustor conditions, and a low turbulence condition. The data have been run over an eight to one range in Reynolds numbers for each test surface with Reynolds numbers ranging from 62,500 to 500,000 for the large leading edge and 15,625 to 125,000 for the smaller leading edge. The data show augmentation levels of up to 110% in the stagnation region for the large leading edge. However, the heat transfer results for the large cylindrical leading edge do not appear to infer a significant level of turbulence intensification in the stagnation region. The smaller cylindrical leading edge shows more consistency with earlier stagnation region heat transfer results correlated on the TRL parameter. These results indicate that the intensification of approaching turbulence is more prevalent with the more rapid straining of the smaller leading edge. The downstream regions of both test surfaces continue to accelerate the flow but at a much lower rate than the leading edge. Bypass transition occurs in these regions providing a useful set of data to ground the prediction of transition onset and length over a wide range of Reynolds numbers and turbulence intensity and scales.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Zapp, G. M., 1950, “The Effect of Turbulence on Local Heat Transfer Coefficients Around a Cylinder Normal to an Air Stream,” M.S. thesis, Oregon State College, Corvallis, OR.
Smith, M. C., and Kuethe, A. M., 1966, “Effects of Turbulence on Laminar Skin Friction and Heat Transfer,” Phys. Fluids, 9(12), pp.2337–2344. [CrossRef]
Kestin, J., and Wood, R. T., 1971, “The Influence of Turbulence on Mass Transfer From Cylinders,” J. Heat Transfer, 93, pp.321–327. [CrossRef]
Lowery, G. W., and Vachon, R. I., 1975, “The Effect of Turbulence on Heat Transfer From Heated Cylinders,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 18, pp.1229–1242. [CrossRef]
Mehendale, A. B., Han, J. C., and Ou, S., 1991, “Influence of High Mainstream Turbulence on Leading Edge Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 113, pp.843–850. [CrossRef]
Hunt, J. C. R., 1973, “A Theory of Turbulent Flow Round Two-Dimensional Bluff Bodies,” J. Fluid Mech., 61(4), pp.625–706. [CrossRef]
Britter, R. E., Hunt, J. C. R., and Mumford, J. C., 1979, “The Distortion of Turbulence by a Circular Cylinder,” J. Fluid Mech., 92, pp.269–301. [CrossRef]
Rigby, D. L., and Van Fossen, G. J., 1991, “Increased Heat Transfer to a Cylindrical Leading Edge Due to Spanwise Variations in the Freestream Velocity,” AIAA 22nd Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, Paper No. AIAA-91-1739.
Kestin, J., 1966, “The Effect of Free-Stream Turbulence on Heat Transfer Rate,” Advances in Heat Transfer, 3rd ed., T. F.Irvine and J. P.Harnett, eds., Academic Press, London.
Ames, F. E., and Moffat, R. J., 1990, “Heat Transfer With High Intensity, Large Scale Turbulence: The Flat Plate Turbulent Boundary Layer and the Cylindrical Stagnation Point,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Ames, F. E., 1997, “The Influence of Large Scale, High Intensity Turbulence on Vane Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 119, pp.23–30. [CrossRef]
Ames, F. E., Wang, C., and Barbot, P. A., 2003, “Measurement and Prediction of the Influence of Catalytic and Dry Low NOx Combustor Turbulence on Vane Surface Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125, pp.210–220. [CrossRef]
Ames, F. E., Argenziano, M., and Wang, C., 2004, “Measurement and Prediction of Heat Transfer Distributions on an Aft Loaded Vane Subjected to the Influence of Catalytic and Dry Low NOx Combustor Turbulence,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126, pp.139–149. [CrossRef]
Ames, F. E., Dvorak, L. A., and Morrow, M. J., 2005, “Turbulent Augmentation of Internal Convection off Pins in Staggered Pin Fin Arrays,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127, pp.183–190. [CrossRef]
Van Fossen, G. J., Simoneau, R. J., and Ching, C. Y., 1995, “Influence of Turbulence Parameters, Reynolds Number, and Body Shape on Stagnation Region Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 117, pp.597–603. [CrossRef]
Van Fossen, G. J., and Bunker, R. S., 2001, “Augmentation of Stagnation Region Heat Transfer Due to Turbulence From a DLN Can Combustor,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123, pp.140–146. [CrossRef]
Dullenkopf, K., and Mayle, R. E., 1995, “An Account of Free-Stream Turbulence Length Scale on Laminar Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 117, pp.401–406. [CrossRef]
Oo, A. N., and Ching, C. Y., 2002, “Stagnation Line Heat Transfer Augmentation due to Freestream Vortical Structures and Vorticity,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 124, pp.583–587. [CrossRef]
Nix, A. C., Diller, T. E., and Ng, W. F., 2007, “Experimental Measurements and Modeling of the Effects of Large-Scale Freestream Turbulence on Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 129, pp.542–550. [CrossRef]
Nix, A. C., and Diller, T. E., 2005, “Experiments on the Physical Mechanism of Heat Transfer Augmentation by Freestream Turbulence at a Cylinder Stagnation Point,” Paper No. GT-2005-68616.
Gifford, A. R., Diller, T. E., and Vlachos, P. P., 2011, “The Physical Mechanism of Heat Transfer Augmentation in Stagnation Flow Subject to Freestream Turbulence,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 133, p. 021901. [CrossRef]
Bae, S., Lele, S. K., and Sung, H. G., 2002, “The Influence of Inflow Disturbances on Stagnation Region Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 122, pp.258–265. [CrossRef]
Kays, W. M., Crawford, M. E., and Weigand, B., 2005, Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Zukauskas, A., and Ziugzda, J., 1985, Heat Transfer of a Cylinder in Crossflow, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York.
Moffat, R. J., 1988, “Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 1, pp.3–17. [CrossRef]
Radomsky, R., and Thole, K. A., 2002, “Detailed Boundary Layer Measurements on a Turbine Stator Vane at Elevated Freestream Turbulence Levels,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 23(2), pp.137–147. [CrossRef]
Radomsky, R., and Thole, K. A., 2000, “Highly Turbulent Flowfield Measurements Around a Stator Vane,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122, pp.255–262. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of low speed wind tunnel with cylindrical test section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of model aero-combustor turbulence generator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Geometries of the 0.1016 m and 0.4064 m diameter cylinders

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Calculated surface velocity distributions over 0.1016 m and 0.4064 m diameter leading edge cylinders

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of experimental Nusselt number distributions for low turbulence condition with STAN7 predictions for smaller (0.1016 m) cylinder and afterbody

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of experimental Nusselt number distributions for low turbulence condition with STAN7 predictions for larger (0.4064 m) cylinder and afterbody

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Correlation of the fractional increase in heat transfer versus the TRL parameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Nusselt number versus TRL parameter for smaller (0.1016 m) and larger (0.4064 m) cylindrical leading edge test surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Nusselt number distribution on 0.1016 m diameter leading edge test surface for ReD = 62,500 based on approach velocity comparing the influence of turbulence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Nusselt number distribution on 0.1016 m diameter leading edge test surface, ReD = 125,000 based on approach velocity comparing the influence of turbulence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Nusselt number distribution on 0.4064 m diameter leading edge test surface, ReD = 250,000 based on approach velocity comparing the influence of turbulence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Nusselt number distribution on 0.4064 m diameter leading edge test surface, ReD = 500,000 based on approach velocity comparing the influence of turbulence

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In