0
Research Papers

Aerodynamics of a Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers—Part I: Steady Flow Measurements

[+] Author and Article Information
Brian R. McAuliffe

Institute for Aerospace Research,
National Research Council of Canada,
Ottawa, ON, K1A 0R6, Canada

Steen A. Sjolander

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Carleton University,
Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

Aerodynamics Group United Technologies, Pratt & Whitney
East Hartford, CT, 06118

1Corresponding author. e-mail: ali.mahallati@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 8, 2011; final manuscript received August 4, 2011 published online November 6, 2012. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(1), 011010 (Nov 06, 2012) (9 pages) Paper No: TURBO-11-1102; doi: 10.1115/1.4006319 History: Received July 08, 2011; Revised August 04, 2011

This two-part paper presents a detailed experimental investigation of the laminar separation and transition phenomena on the suction surface of a high-lift low-pressure turbine airfoil, PakB. The first part describes the influence of Reynolds number, freestream turbulence intensity and turbulence length scale on the PakB airfoil under steady inflow conditions. The present measurements are distinctive in that a closely-spaced array of hot-film sensors has allowed a very detailed examination of the suction surface boundary layer behavior. In addition, this paper presents a technique for interpreting the transition process in steady, and periodically unsteady, separated flows based on dynamic and statistical properties of the hot-film measurements. Measurements were made in a low-speed linear cascade facility at Reynolds numbers between 25,000 and 150,000 at three freestream turbulence intensity levels of 0.4%, 2%, and 4%. Two separate grids were used to generate turbulence intensity of 4% with integral length scales of about 10% and 40% of the airfoil axial chord length. While the higher levels of turbulence intensity promoted earlier transition and a shorter separation bubble, turbulence length scale did not have a noticeable effect on the transition process. The size of the suction side separation bubble increased with decreasing Reynolds number, and under low freestream turbulence levels the bubble failed to reattach at low Reynolds numbers. As expected, the losses increased with the length of the separation bubble, and increased significantly when the bubble failed to reattach.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Qui, S., and Simon, T. W., 1997, “An Experimental Investigation of Transition as Applied to Low Pressure Turbine Suction Surface Flows,” IGTI ASME Paper No. 97-GT-455.
Lake, J. P., King, P. I., and Rivir, R. B., 1999, “Reduction of Separation Losses on a Turbine Blade With Low Reynolds Numbers,” Proceedings of the 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 11–14, AIAA Paper No. 99-0242.
Dorney, D. J., Ashpis, D. E., Halstead, D. E., and Wisler, D. C., 1999, “Study of Boundary Layer Development in Two-Stage Low-Pressure Turbine,” Proceedings of the 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 11–14, AIAA Paper No. 99-0742.
Murawski, C. G., and Vafai, K., 2000, “An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Freestream Turbulence on the Wake of a Separated Low Pressure Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Numbers,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 122, pp. 431–433. [CrossRef]
Volino, R. J., and Hultgren, L. S., 2001, “Measurements in Separated and Transitional Boundary Layers Under Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123, pp. 189–197. [CrossRef]
Volino, R. J., 2002, “Separated Flow Transition Under Simulated Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions—Part 1: Mean Flow and Turbulence Statistics,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124, pp. 645–655. [CrossRef]
Suzen, Y. B., Huang, P. G., Volino, R. J., Corke, T. C., Thomas, F. O., Hunag, J., Lake, J. P., and King, P. I., 2003, “A Comprehensive CFD Study of Transitional Flows in Low-Pressure Turbines Under a Wide Range of Operating Conditions,” Proceedings of the 33rd Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL, June 23–26, AIAA Paper No. 2003-3591.
Huang, J., 2005, “Separation Control Over Low Pressure Turbine Blades Using Plasma Actuators,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
Anderson, B. T., Meyer, R. R., and Chiest, H. R., 1991, “Techniques Used in the F-14 Variable-Sweep Transition Flight Experiment,” AIAA J. Aircr., 28, pp. 622–629. [CrossRef]
Hodson, H. P., 1985, “Measurements of Wake-Generated Unsteadiness in the Rotor Passage of Axial Flow Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 107, pp. 467–476. [CrossRef]
Davis, M. R. D., and Duffy, J. T., 1995, “A Semi-Empirical Theory for Surface Mounted Aerodynamic Wall Shear Stress Gauges,” IGTI ASME Paper No. 95-GT-193.
Halstead, D. E., Wisler, D. C., Okiishi, T. H., Walker, G. J., Hodson, H. P., and Shin, H.-W., 1997, “Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines: Part 3 of 4—LP Turbines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 119, pp. 225–237. [CrossRef]
Howell, R. J., Ramesh, O. N., Hodson, H. P., Harvey, N. W., and Schulte, V., 2001, “High Lift and Aft-Loaded Profiles for Low-Pressure Turbines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123, pp. 181–188. [CrossRef]
McAuliffe, B. R., 2003, “An Experimental Study of Flow Control Using Blowing for a Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil,” Master’s thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
McAuliffe, B. R., and Yaras, M. I., 2010, “Transition Mechanisms in Separation Bubbles Under Low and Elevated Freestream Turbulence,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132, 011004. [CrossRef]
Seban, R. A., 1964, “Heat Transfer to the Turbulent Separated Flow of Air Downstream of a Step in the Surface of a Plate,” Trans. ASME, Ser. C: J. Heat Transfer, 86, pp. 259–264. [CrossRef]
Graveline, S., and Sjolander, S. A., 2005, “Measurements of Separated Flow Transition on a Moderately-Loaded Turbine Airfoil,” Proceedings of the 35th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, June 6–9, AIAA Paper No. 2005-4766.
Butler, R. J., Byerley, A. R., Treuren, K. V., and Baughn, J. W., 2001, “The Effect of Turbulence Intensity and Length Scale on Low-Pressure Turbine Blade Aerodynamics,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 22, pp. 123–133. [CrossRef]
Roberts, S. K., and Yaras, M. I., 2003, “Measurements and Prediction of Free-Stream Turbulence and Pressure-Gradient History on Attached-Flow Boundary-Layer Transition,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38261. [CrossRef]
Binder, A., Schroder, T., and Hourmouziadis, J., 1989, “Turbulence Measurements in a Multistage Low-Pressure Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 111, pp. 153–161. [CrossRef]
Rodger, P., Sjolander, S. A., and Moustapha, S., 1992, “Establishing Two-Dimensional Flow in a Large-Scale Planar Turbine Cascade,” Proceedings of the 28th Joint Propulsion Conference, Nashville, TN, July 6–8, AIAA Paper No. 1992-3066.
Mayle, R. E., Dullenkopf, K., and Schultz, A., 1998, “The Turbulence That Matters,” ASME J. Turbomach., 120, pp. 402–409. [CrossRef]
Jacobs, R. G., and Durbin, P. A., 2001, “Simulations of Bypass Transition,” J. Fluid Mech., 428, pp. 185–212. [CrossRef]
Volino, R. J., 2002, “Separated Flow Transition Under Simulated Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions—Part 2: Turbulence Spectra,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124, pp. 656–664. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Variable incidence linear cascade test section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Static pressure coefficient distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Time histories of hot-film signals at Rei = 100,000 at FSTI = 0.4% (height of separation bubble exaggerated)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Suction surface loading and hot-film data at Rei = 50,000 and Rei = 100,000 - FSTI

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized mixed-out pressure losses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Suction surface loading and hot-film data at Rei = 50,000 and Rei = 100,000 - integral length scale

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In