Research Papers

Transition Modeling for Vortex Generating Jets on Low-Pressure Turbine Profiles

[+] Author and Article Information
Florian Herbst

Research Assistant
Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics
Leibniz Universitaet Hannover
Hannover, 30167, Germany
e-mail: Herbst@tfd.uni-hannover.de

Dragan Kožulović

Member of ASME
Institute of Fluid Mechanics
Technische Universitaet Braunschweig
Braunschweig, 38106, Germany
e-mail: D.Kozulovic@tu-braunschweig.de

Joerg R. Seume

Senior Member ASME
Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics
Leibniz Universitaet Hannover
Hannover, 30167, Germany
e-mail: Seume@tfd.uni-hannover.de

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 29, 2011; final manuscript received August 10, 2011; published online October 31, 2012. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(1), 011038 (Oct 31, 2012) (8 pages) Paper No: TURBO-11-1167; doi: 10.1115/1.4006421 History: Received July 29, 2011; Revised August 10, 2011

Steady blowing vortex generating jets (VGJ) on highly-loaded low-pressure turbine profiles have shown to be a promising way to decrease total pressure losses at low Reynolds-numbers by reducing laminar separation. In the present paper, the state of the art turbomachinery design code TRACE with RANS turbulence closure and coupled γ-ReΘ transition model is applied to the prediction of typical aerodynamic design parameters of various VGJ configurations in steady simulations. High-speed cascade wind tunnel experiments for a wide range of Reynolds-numbers, two VGJ positions, and three jet blowing ratios are used for validation. Since the original transition model overpredicts separation and losses at Re2is100·103, an extra mode for VGJ induced transition is introduced. Whereas the criterion for transition is modeled by a filtered Q vortex criterion the transition development itself is modeled by a reduction of the local transition-onset momentum-thickness Reynolds number. The new model significantly improves the quality of the computational results by capturing the corresponding local transition process in a physically reasonable way. This is shown to yield an improved quantitative prediction of surface pressure distributions and total pressure losses.

© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hourmouziadis, J., 1989, “Aerodynamic Design of Low Pressure Turbines,” AGARD Lecture Series 167.
Mayle, R. E., 1991, “The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 113(4), pp. 509–536. [CrossRef]
Gier, J., Franke, M., Hübner, N., and Schröder, T., 2008, “Designing LP Turbines for Optimized Airfoil Lift,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (GT2008), Berlin, June 9–13, ASME Paper No. GT2008-51101. [CrossRef]
Bons, J. P., Sondergaard, R., and Rivir, R. B., 1999, “Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Separation using Vortex Generator Jets,” Proceedings of the 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 11–14, Paper No. AIAA-1999-367.
Gier, J., Raab, I., Schröder, T., Hübner, N., Franke, M., Kennepohl, F., Lippl, F., and Germain, T., 2007, “Preparation of Aero Technology for New Generation Aircraft Engine LP Turbines,” Proceedings of the First European Air and Space Conference, Berlin, September 10–13, Paper No. CEAS-2007-139.
Volino, R. J., Kartuzova, O., and Ibrahim, M. B., 2009, “Experimental and Computational Investigations of Low-Pressure Turbine Separation Control Using Vortex Generator Jets,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (GT2009), Orlando, FL, June 8–12, ASME Paper No. GT- 2009-59983. [CrossRef]
Gad El Hak, M., 2006, Flow Control—Passive, Active and Reactive Flow Management, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Lou, H., Qiao, W., and Xu, K., 2009, “Passive Control of Laminar Separation Bubble With Spanwise Groove on a Low-Speed Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine Blade,” J. Therm. Sci., 18(3), pp. 193–201. [CrossRef]
Himmel, C. G., Thomas, R. L., and Hodson, H. P., 2009, “Effective Passive Flow Control for Ultra-High Lift Low Pressure Turbines,” Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Turbomachinery: EUROTURBO 8, Graz, Austria, March 23–27.
Volino, R. J., 2003, “Passive Flow Control on Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(4), pp. 754–764. [CrossRef]
McAuliffe, B. R., and Sjolander, S. A., 2004, “Active Flow Control Using Steady Blowing for a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(4), pp. 560–569. [CrossRef]
McQuilling, M., and Jacob, J., 2004, “Effect of Chord Location on Separation Control With Vortex Generator Jets on Low Pressure Turbine Blades,” Proceedings of the 2nd Flow Control Conference, Portland, OR, June 28–July 1, Paper No. AIAA 2004-2205.
Postl, D., 2005, “Numerical Investigation of Laminar Separation Control Using Vortex Generating Jets,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Schumann, T., Rose, M. G., Staudacher, S., Gier, J., and Schröder, T., 2008, “The Effects of Steady Injection on an Ultra High Lift Vane in a LP Turbine,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (GT2008), Berlin, June 9–13, ASME Paper No. GT2008-50330. [CrossRef]
Herbst, F., Biester, M., Fiala, A., Engel, K., and Seume, J. R., 2010, “Validation of RANS-Modelling Approaches for Active Flow Control by Vortex Generating Jets in a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade,” Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements (ETMM8), Marseille, France, June 9–11.
Volino, R. J., 2003, “Separation Control on Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Synthetic Jet Vortex Generator Jets,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(4), pp. 765–777. [CrossRef]
Margason, R. J., 1993, “Fifty Years of Jet in Crossflow,” Proceedings of the 72nd AGARD Fluid Dynamics Panel Meeting and Symposium on Computational and Experimental Assessment of Jet in Crossflow, R. K. Nangia, ed., Winchester, UK, April 19–23, Paper No. AGARD-CP-534.
Compton, D. A., and Johnston, J. P., 1992, “Streamwise Vortex Production by Pitched and Skewed Jets in a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” AIAA J., 30(3), pp. 640–647. [CrossRef]
McGovern, K. T., and Leylek, J. H., 2000, “A Detailed Analysis of Film Cooling Physics: Part II—Compound-Angle Injection With Cylindrical Holes,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122(1), pp. 113–121. [CrossRef]
Sondergaard, R., Rivir, R. B., and Bons, J. P., 2002, “Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Separation Using Vortex-Generator Jets,” J. Propul. Power, 18(4), pp. 889–895. [CrossRef]
Eldredge, R., and Bons, J., 2004, “Active Control of a Separating Boundary Layer With Steady Vortex Generating Jets—Detailed Flow Measurements,” Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Paper No. AIAA 2004-751.
Rizzetta, D. P., and Miguel, R. V., 2006, “Numerical Study of Active Flow Control for a Transitional Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine,” J. Fluids Eng., 128(5), pp. 956–966. [CrossRef]
Postl, D., Gross, A., and Fasel, H. F., 2004, “Numerical Investigation of Active Flow Control for Low-Pressure Turbine Blade Separation,” Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 5–8, Paper No. AIAA 2004-0750.
Garg, V. K., 2002, “Low-Pressure Turbine Separation Control—Comparison With Experimental Data,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (GT2002), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 3–6, ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30229. [CrossRef]
Rumsey, C. L., and Swanson, R. C., 2009, “Turbulence Modelling for Active Flow Control Application,” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 23(4), pp. 317–326. [CrossRef]
Kožulović, D., Röber, T., and Nürnberger, D., 2007, “Application of a Multimode Transition Model to Turbomachinery Flows,” Proceedings of the 7th European Turbomachinery Conference, Athens, Greece, March 5–9.
Langtry, R., and Menter, F., 2009, “Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes,” AIAA J., 47(12), pp. 2894–2906. [CrossRef]
Marciniak, V., Kügeler, E., and Franke, M., 2010, “Predicting Transition on Low-Pressure Turbine Profiles,” Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD 2010, Lisbon, Portugal, June 14–17.
Kügeler, E., Nürnberger, D., Weber, A., and Engel, K., 2008, “Influence of Blade Fillets on the Performance of a 15 Stage Gas Turbine Compressor,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (GT2008), Berlin, June 9–13, ASME Paper No. GT2008-50748. [CrossRef]
Yang, H., Nuernberger, D., and Kersken, H.-P., 2006, “Toward Excellence in Turbomachinery Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Hybrid Structured-Unstructured Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solver,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(2), pp. 390–402. [CrossRef]
Wilcox, D. C., 2006, Turbulence Modelling for CFD, 3rd ed., DCW Industries, La Cañada, CA.
Röber, T., Kožulović, D., Kügeler, E., and Nürnberger, D., 2006, “Appropriate Turbulence Modelling for Turbomachinery Using a Two-Equation Turbulence Model,” New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics V (Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, Vol. 92), H.-J.Rath, C.Holze, H.-J.Heinemann, R.Henke, and H.Hnlinger, eds., Springer, Berlin / Heidelberg, pp. 446–454.
Malan, P., Suluksna, K., and Juntasaro, E., 2009, “Calibrating the γ-ReΘ Transition Model,” ERCOFTAC Bull., 80, pp. 53–57.
Jeong, J., and Hussain, F., 1995, “On the Identification of a Vortex,” J. Fluid Mech., 285, pp. 69–94 . [CrossRef]
Hunt, J. C. R., Wray, A. A., and Moin, P., 1988, “Eddies, Streams, and Convergence Zones in Turbulent Flows,” Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases 2: Proceedings of the 1988 Summer Program, Paper No. SEE N89-2453818-34, pp. 193–208.
Lengani, D., Simoni, D., Ubaldi, M., Zunino, P., and Bertini, F., 2009, “An Experimental Study of the Reynolds Number Influence on a Laminar Separation Bubble,” ERCOFTAC Bull., 80, pp. 24–28.
Kožulović, D., and Röber, T., 2006, “Modelling the Streamline Curvature Effects in Turbomachinery Flows,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (GT2006), Barcelona, Spain, May 8–11, ASME Paper No. GT2006-90265. [CrossRef]
Ludewig, T., and Niehuis, R., 2008, “Untersuchungen am Turbinengitter T161-T-Jet mit saugseitiger Ausblasung zur Bestimmung des Grenzschichtverhaltens, Abschlussbericht zum Messprogramm 216. Forschungsbericht der Universität der Bundeswehr München,” unpublished internal report, MTU Aero Engines.
Amecke, J., 1967, “Auswertung von Nachlaufmessungen an ebenen Schaufelgittern,” Tech. Report, Bericht 67 A 49, AVA Göttingen.
Yang, H., Nuernberger, D., Nicke, E., and Weber, A., 2003, “Numerical Investigation of Casing Treatment Mechanisms With a Conservative Mixed-Cell Approach,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (GT2003), Atlanta, GA, June 16–19, ASME Paper No. GT2003-38483. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Vortex structures of a jet in crossflow configuration according to Ref. [17]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Q vortex criterion at VGJ flat plate setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flat plate setup with boundary conditions (translational-periodic boundary condition in z-direction)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

VGJ transition criterion FVGJ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

T161 high-lift LPT profile with two VGJ-configurations, type I at 63% and type II at 69% axial length, with d/lax = 0.020 and j/d = 10 (distorted geometry)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

ζV of Re2is=200·103 (left) and ζV, m for Re2is=50·103...400·103 (right) without AFC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

cp of Re2is=70·103 (left) and 200·103 (right) without AFC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Mesh of type I VGJ, every second grid line shown (distorted geometry)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

cp of Re2is=70·103, type I, B = 0.5 (left) and associated magnification of the trailing edge region (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

ζV of Re2is=70·103 (left) and ζV, m for Re2is=50·103...400·103 (right), type I, B = 0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Isosurface FVGJ = 1 at Re2is=70·103, type I, B = 0.5 (geometry distorted)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

ζV, m for Re2is=50·103...200·103 (left) and cp of Re2is=70·103 (right), type I, B = 1.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

ζV, m for Re2is=50·103...120·103 (left) and cp of Re2is=70·103 (right), type II, B = 1.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

ζV, m (left) and cp (right) at Re2is=70·103, type II, B = 1.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

μt/μ downstream VGJ without (upper) and with (lower) VGJ transition mode, at Re2is=70·103, type I, B = 0.5 (geometry distorted)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Boundary layer separation (derived form τw) at the profile’s suction side without (upper) and with (lower) VGJ transition mode, at Re2is=70·103, type I, B = 0.5




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In