0
Research Papers

Stability Improvement of High-Pressure-Ratio Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressor by Asymmetrical Flow Control—Part II: Nonaxisymmetrical Self-Recirculation Casing Treatment

[+] Author and Article Information
Xinqian Zheng

e-mail: zhengxq@tsinghua.edu.cn

Mingyang Yang

State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China

Hideaki Tamaki

Turbo Machinery and Engine Technology,
Department, IHI Corporation,
Yokohama, 235-8501, Japan

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNALOF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received April 26, 2010; final manuscript received December 26, 2011; published online November 1, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Michael Casey.

J. Turbomach 135(2), 021007 (Nov 01, 2012) (8 pages) Paper No: TURBO-10-1039; doi: 10.1115/1.4006637 History: Received April 26, 2010; Revised December 26, 2011

This is part II of a two-part paper involving the development of an asymmetrical flow control method to widen the operating range of a turbocharger centrifugal compressor with high-pressure ratio. A nonaxisymmetrical self-recirculation casing treatment (SRCT) as an instance of asymmetrical flow control method is presented. Experimental and numerical methods were used to investigate the impact of nonaxisymmetrical SRCT on the surge point of the centrifugal compressor. First, the influence of the geometry of a symmetric SRCT on the compressor performance was studied by means of numerical simulation. The key parameter of the SRCT was found to be the distance from the main blade leading edge to the rear groove (Sr). Next, several arrangements of a nonaxisymmetrical SRCT were designed, based on flow analysis presented in part I. Then, a series of experiments were carried out to analyze the influence of nonaxisymmetrical SRCT on the compressor performance. Results show that the nonaxisymmetrical SRCT has a certain influence on the performance and has a larger potential for stability improvement than the traditional symmetric SRCT. For the investigated SRCT, the surge flow rate of the compressor with the nonaxisymmetrical SRCTs is about 10% lower than that of the compressor with symmetric SRCT. The largest surge margin (smallest surge flow rate) can be obtained when the phase of the largest Sr is coincident with the phase of the minimum static pressure in the vicinity of the leading edge of the splitter blades.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Sketch of meshing approach for tip clearance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The computational domain of single passage and whole stage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sketch of SRCT in a centrifugal compressor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Influence of SRCT geometry on the compressor pressure ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Influence of SRCT geometry on the efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Influence of SRCT geometry on the recirculation flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Circumferential Sr distribution for seven SRCT types

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Separated shroud with SRCT and volute

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of surge flow rates for compressors with symmetric SRCTs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of surge flow rates for compressors with nonaxisymmetrical SRCTs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Static pressure distribution at the leading edge of the splitter blades near surge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Ms comparison for compressors with different nonaxisymmetrical SRCTs at different rotational speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of surge flow rate for compressors with type G SRCT and type C SRCT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Flow rate distribution in the impeller passages near surge at 100%N

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Sections in compressors with SRCT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Relative flow angle distribution near main blade leading edge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Relative flow angle distribution near splitter leading edge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Static pressure distribution near the outlet of diffuser

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Relative flow angle distribution near main blade leading edge

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In