0
Research Papers

Aeroelasticity at Reversed Flow Conditions—Part III: Reduction of Surge Loads by Means of Intentional Mistuning

[+] Author and Article Information
Harald Schoenenborn

e-mail: Harald.Schoenenborn@mtu.de

Mirja de Vries

MTU Aero Engines GmbH,
D-80995 Munich,
Germany

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received June 29, 2012; final manuscript received September 14, 2012; published online June 5, 2013. Assoc. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(4), 041009 (Jun 05, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1096; doi: 10.1115/1.4007683 History: Received June 29, 2012; Revised September 14, 2012

Compressor surge consists of four phases: (i) pressure rise, (ii) flow breakdown, (iii) blow-down, and (iv) flow recovery. During the blow-down phase reversed flow conditions exist, where a blade may accumulate hundreds of vibration cycles, depending on the surge volume and the vibration frequency. High vibration amplitudes and blade damages were observed in the past. In Part I (GT2011-45034) a compressor cascade was analyzed experimentally and analytically at steady reversed flow conditions. It has been shown that (i) the steady flow field can be predicted well by CFD analysis, (ii) the overall damping coefficient calculated by unsteady CFD compares reasonably well with measurements, and (iii) a blade may become unstable at certain reversed flow conditions. In Part II (GT2011-45035) the analytical procedures used in Part I were applied to the front part of a multistage HPC for reversed flow conditions. It was found that surge loads consist in reality of two physically different phenomena (i) the pressure wave during the flow breakdown leading to rather low blade stresses and (ii) flutter during the blow-down phase which may lead to very high blade stresses and damages during surge for some stages. As it is well known that intentional mistuning is a way to mitigate flutter, intentional mistuning is investigated in Part III of the paper at reversed flow conditions. At first, a CFD study of a single airfoil is presented showing the dependency of aerodynamic damping upon flow angle and pressure ratio over the airfoil at reversed flow conditions, including intentional mistuning studies. Secondly, an investigation is presented which shows experimentally and analytically that surge stresses can be reduced significantly by the use of intentional mistuning. In a multistage compressor test rig, one rotor stage, which experienced very high stresses during surge, was subjected to a cutback on every second blade, leading to significantly reduced surge stresses. Analytically, an aeroelastic eigenvalue analysis showed the same behavior.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Schoenenborn, H., Chenaux, V., and Ott, P., 2011, “Aeroelasticity at Reversed Flow Conditions—Part 1: Numerical and Experimental Investigations of a Compressor Cascade With Controlled Vibration,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45034.
Schoenenborn, H., and Breuer, T., 2011, “Aeroelasticity at Reversed Flow Conditions—Part 2: Application to Compressor Surge,” 134(6), p. 061031.
Schoenenborn, H., and Breuer, T., 2004, “Aerodynamic and Mechanical Vibration Analysis of a Compressor Blisk at Surge,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53579.
Kaza, K. R., and Kielb, R. E., 1983, “Aeroelastic Characteristics of a Cascade of Mistuned Blades in Subsonic and Supersonic Flows,” ASME J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Design, 105, pp. 425–433. [CrossRef]
Kaza, K. R., and Kielb, R. E., 1983, “Effects of Structural Coupling on Mistuned Cascade Flutter and Response,” ASME Paper No. 83-GT-117.
Kaza, K. R., and Kielb, R. E., 1984, “Flutter of Turbofan Rotors With Mistuned Blades,” AIAA J., 22(11), pp 1618–1625. [CrossRef]
Ewins, D., 1991, “The Effect of Blade Mistuning on Vibration Response – A Survey,” IFToMM Conference on Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Prague.
Gottfried, D. A., and Fleeter, S., 2002, “Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Flutter Suppression Via Structural Mistuning,” 7th National Turbine Engine HCF Conference May 14–17, Session 6, Paper 6.
Martel, C., Corral, R., and Llorens, J. M., 2006, “Stability Increase of Aerodynamically Unstable Rotors Using Intentional Mistuning,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, Barcelona, Spain, Paper No. GT2006-90407.
Bleeg, J. M., Yang, M., and Eley, J. A., 2007, “Aeroelastic Analysis of Rotors With Flexible Disks and Alternate Blade Mistuning,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27227.
Chan, Y. J., 2009, “Variability of Blade Vibration in Mistuned Bladed Discs,” Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London, UK.
Hohl, A., Panning, L., and Wallaschek, J., 2010, “Analysis of the Influence of Blade Pattern Characteristics on the Forced Response of Mistuned Blisks With a Cyclic CMS-Based Substructure Model,” Proceedings of ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis ESDA, July 12–14, Istanbul, Turkey.
Schoenenborn, H., Junge, M., and Retze, U., 2012, “Contribution to Free and Forced Vibration Analysis of an Intentionally Mistuned Blisk,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68683.
Castanier, M., and Pierre, C., 2006, “Modeling and Analysis of Mistuned Bladed Disk Vibration: Status and Emerging Directions,” J. Propul. Power, 22(2), pp. 384–396. [CrossRef]
Eulitz, F., Engel, K., Nuernberger, D., Schmitt, S., and Yamamoto, K., 1998, “On Recent Advances of a Parallel Time-Accurate Navier-Stokes Solver for Unsteady Turbomachinery Flow,” Proceedings of the 4th ECCOMAS, K. D.Papailiou, D.Tsahalis, J.Periaux, C.Hirsch, and M.Pandolfi, eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 252–258.
Nuernberger, D., Eulitz, F., Schmitt, S., and Zachcial, A., 2001, “Recent Progress in the Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Viscous Multistage Turbomachinery Flow,” ISABE-2001-1081.
Engel, K., Zscherp, C., Wolfrum, N., Nuernberger, D., and Kuegeler, E., 2009, “CFD Simulations of the TP400 IPC in Off-Design Operating Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-60324.
Kahl, G., 2002, “Aeroelastic Effects of Mistuning and Coupling in Turbomachinery Bladings,” Ph.D. thesis, EPFL No. 2629, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lim, S., Bladh, R., Castanier, M. P., and Pierre, C., 2007, “A Compact, Generalized Component Mode Mistuning Representation for Modeling Bladed Disk Vibration,” AIAA J., 45(9), pp. 2285–2298. [CrossRef]
di Mare, L., Krishnababu, S. K., Mueck, B., and Imregun, M., 2009, “Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity of a HP Compressor During Surge and Reversed Flow,” Proceedings of the 12th ISUAAAT, Sept. 1–4, London, UK.
Zielinski, M., and Ziller, G., 2005, “Noncontact Blade Vibration Measurement System for Aero Engine Application,” ISABE, 17th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Munich, Germany, September 4–9, Paper No. 1220.
Zielinski, M., and Ziller, G., 2005, “Noncontact Crack Detection on Compressor Rotor Blades to Prevent Further Damage After HCF-Failure,” NATO RTO-AVT-121 Symposium on the Evaluation, Control and Prevention of HCF in Gas Turbine Engines, Granada, Spain, October 3–6, Paper No. 19.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational setup CFD study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Flow field for the case α = 75 deg, PR = 1.7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Torsional mode shapes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a), (b) Stability curves for the case α = 75 deg, PR = 1.1, and PR = 1.7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Local aerodynamic excitation for the case α = 75 deg, PR = 1.7, IBPA = −90 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a), (b), (c) Normalized aerodynamic damping versus flow angle and pressure ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Normalized aerodynamic damping versus flow angle and torsional axis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Aeroelastic eigenvalues for the case α = 75 deg, PR = 1.7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Investigation setup of a compressor front block

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Normal aerodynamic damping versus IBPA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Influence of intentional mistuning on aeroelastic eigenvalues

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Minimum aerodynamic damping versus mistuning level

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Normalized vibration amplitude versus time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Reduction in surge amplitude versus time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Airfoil cutback and 1T-mode-shapes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Surge deflections without cutback

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Surge deflections with cutback

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Dimensionless surge stress without and with cutback

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In