Research Papers

Heat Transfer Enhancement in Narrow Diverging Channels

[+] Author and Article Information
Srinath V. Ekkad

Fellow ASME
e-mail: sekkad@vt.edu
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061

Samir Salamah

General Electric Company,
Schenectady, NY 12345

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 13, 2012; final manuscript received September 17, 2012; published online June 5, 2013. Assoc. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(4), 041017 (Jun 05, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1145; doi: 10.1115/1.4007740 History: Received July 13, 2012; Revised September 17, 2012

Detailed heat transfer coefficient distributions have been obtained for narrow diverging channels with and without enhancement features. The cooling configurations considered include rib turbulators and concavities (or dimples) on the main heat transfer surfaces. All of the measurements are presented at a representative Reynolds number of 28,000. Pressure drop measurements for the overall channel are also presented to evaluate the heat transfer enhancement geometry with respect to the pumping power requirements. The test models were studied for wall heat transfer coefficient measurements using the transient liquid crystal technique. The model wall inner surfaces were sprayed with thermochromic liquid crystals and a transient test was used to obtain the local heat transfer coefficients from the measured color change. An analysis of the results shows that the choice of designs is limited by the available pressure drop, even if the design provides significantly higher heat transfer coefficients. Dimpled surfaces provide appreciably high heat transfer coefficients and a reasonable pressure drop, whereas ribbed ducts provide significantly higher heat transfer coefficients and a higher overall pressure drop.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental set up

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Wall temperature and hue matching (top). Resulting calibration of hue and temperature (bottom).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Step change in the mainstream temperature obtained from the mesh heater response

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Test section geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Rib turbulator geometries

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dimple configurations used for testing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Detailed heat transfer coefficient distributions for the baseline smooth surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Detailed heat transfer results. From top to bottom: 90 deg ribs, 60 deg ribs, 45 deg V-ribs; case 1, case 2, case 3, and case 4.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparing the overall heat transfer ratios with the overall pressure drop ratio for all cases (single sided only)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In