0
Research Papers

Experimental-Based Redesigns for Trailing Edge Film Cooling of Gas Turbine Blades

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael Benson

U.S. Military Academy,
West Point, NY 10966 
e-mail: michael.benson@us.army.mil

Sayuri D. Yapa

e-mail: yapasd@stanford.edu

Chris Elkins

e-mail: celkins@stanford.edu

John K. Eaton

e-mail: eatonj@stanford.edu
Stanford University,
Stanford, CA 94305

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 16, 2012; final manuscript received August 7, 2012; published online June 5, 2013. Assoc. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(4), 041018 (Jun 05, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1147; doi: 10.1115/1.4007601 History: Received July 16, 2012; Revised August 07, 2012

Magnetic resonance imaging experiments have provided the three-dimensional mean concentration and three component mean velocity field for a typical trailing edge film-cooling cutback geometry built into a conventional uncambered airfoil. This geometry is typical of modern aircraft engines and includes three dimensional slot jets separated by tapered lands. Previous analysis of these data identified the critical mean flow structures that contribute to rapid mixing and low effectiveness in the fully turbulent flow. Three new trailing edge geometries were designed to modify the large scale mean flow structures responsible for surface effectiveness degradation. One modification called the Dolphin Nose attempted to weaken strong vortex flows by reducing three dimensionality near the slot breakout. This design changed the flow structure but resulted in minimal improvement in the surface effectiveness. Two other designs called the Shield and Rounded Shield changed the land planform and added an overhanging land edge while maintaining the same breakout surface. These designs substantially modified the vortex structure and improved the surface effectiveness by as much as 30%. Improvements included superior coolant uniformity on the breakout surface which reduces potential thermal stresses. The utilization of the time averaged data from combined magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) and concentration (MRC) experiments for designing improved trailing edge breakout film cooling is demonstrated.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Cravens, C., 2010, “Gas Turbine Observations: Bleed and Power Extraction,” Aircraft Engine Historical Society, http://www.enginehistory.org/GasTurbines/gas_turbine_observations.htm
Cunha, F., and Chyu, M., 2006, “Trailing-Edge Cooling for Gas Turbines,” J. Prop. Power22(2), pp. 286–300. [CrossRef]
Ames, F., Johnson, J., and Fiala, N., 2007, “Gill Slot Trailing Edge Aerodynamics—Effects of Blowing Rate, Reynolds Number, and External Turbulence on Aerodynamic Losses and Pressure Distribution,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27399.
Rehder, H., 2009, “Investigation of Trailing Edge Cooling Concepts in a High Pressure Turbine Cascade—Aerodynamic Experiments and Loss Analysis,” ASME Paper No. GT 2009-59303.
Laskowski, G., and Felten, F., 2010, “Steady and Unsteady CFD Simulations of Transonic Turbine Vane Wakes With Trailing Edge Cooling,” Proceedings of the European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Bogard, D., and Thole, K., 2006, “Gas Turbine Film Cooling,” J. Prop. Power, 22(2), pp. 249–270. [CrossRef]
Benson, M., Elkins, C., Yapa, S., Ling, J., and Eaton, J., 2012, “Effects of Varying Reynolds Number, Blowing Ratio, and Internal Geometry on Trailing Edge Cutback Film Cooling,” Exp. Fluids, 52, pp. 1415–1430. [CrossRef]
Benson, M., 2011, “Measurements of 3D Velocity and Scalar Field for a Film-Cooled Airfoil Trailing Edge,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Benson, M., Elkins, C., and Eaton, J., 2011, “Measurements of 3D Velocity and Scalar Field for a Film-Cooled Airfoil Trailing Edge,” Exp. Fluids, 51, pp. 443–455. [CrossRef]
Taslim, M., Spring, S., and Mehlman, B., 1992, “Experimental Investigation of Film Cooling Effectiveness for Slots of Various Exit Geometries,” J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer, 6(2), pp. 302–307. [CrossRef]
Martini, P., Schulz, A., and Bauer, H., 2006, “Film Cooling Effectiveness and Heat Transfer on the Trailing Edge Cutback of Gas Turbine Airfoils With Various Internal Cooling Designs,” J. Turbomach., 128, pp. 196–205. [CrossRef]
Choi, J., Mhetras, S., Lau, S., and Rudolph, R., 2008, “Film Cooling and Heat Transfer on Two Cutback Trailing Edge Models With Internal Perforated Blockages,” J. Heat Transfer, 130, pp. 1–13. [CrossRef]
Dannhauer, A., 2009, “Investigation of Trailing Edge Cooling Concepts in a High Pressure Turbine Cascade—Analysis of the Adiabatic Film Cooling Effectiveness,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59343.
Krueckels, J., Gritsch, M., and Schnieder, M., 2009, “Design Considerations and Validation of Trailing Edge Pressure Side Bleed Cooling,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59161.
Fiala, N., Jaswal, I., and Ames, F., 2010, “Letterbox Trailing Edge Heat Transfer: Effects of Blowing Rate, Reynolds Number, and External Turbulence on Heat Transfer and Film Cooling Effectiveness,” J. Turbomach., 132, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Bittlinger, G., Schulz, A., and Wittig, S., 1994, “Film Cooling Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficients for Slot Injection at High Blowing Ratios,” ASME Paper No. GT1994-182.
Yang, Z., and Hu, H., 2011, “Trailing Edge Cooling Effectiveness Measurements of Turbine Blades Using Pressure Sensitive Paint (PSP) Technique,” J. Propul. Power, 27(3), pp. 700–709. [CrossRef]
Burns, W., and Stollery, J., 1968, “The Influence of Foreign Gas Injection and Slot Geometry on Film Cooling Effectiveness,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 12, pp. 935–951. [CrossRef]
Dellimore, K., Marshall, A., and Cadou, C., 2010, “Influence of Compressibility on Film-Cooling Performance,” J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer, 24(3), pp. 506–515. [CrossRef]
Holloway, D., Leylek, J., and Buck, F., 2002, “Pressure Side Bleed Film Cooling Part 1: Steady Framework for Experimental and Computational Results,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30471.
Holloway, D., Leylek, J., and Buck, F., 2002, “Pressure-Side Bleed Film Cooling Part 2: Unsteady Framework for Experimental and Computational Results,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30472.
Martini, P., Schulz, A., Bauer, H., and Whitney, C., 2006, “Detached Eddy Simulation of Film Cooling Performance on the Trailing Edge Cutback of Gas Turbine Airfoils,” J. Turbomach., 128, pp. 292–299. [CrossRef]
Joo, J., and Durbin, P., 2009, “Simulation of Turbine Blade Trailing Edge Cooling,” J. Fluids Eng., 131, pp. 1–14. [CrossRef]
Elkins, C., Markl, M., Pelc, N., and Eaton, J., 2003, “4D Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry for Mean Velocity Measurements in Complex Turbulent Flows,” Exp. Fluids, 34, pp. 494–503. [CrossRef]
Pedersen, D., Eckert, E., and Goldstein, R., 1977, “Film Cooling With Large Density Differences Between the Mainstream and Secondary Fluid Measured by the Heat-Mass Transfer Analogy,” J. Heat Transfer, 99, pp. 620–627. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y., Matalanis, C., and Eaton, J., 2008, “High Resolution PIV Measurements Around a Model Turbine Blade Trailing Edge Film-Cooling Breakout,” Exp. Fluids, 44, pp. 199–209. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Channel test section, with dimensions in mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Top and side views of the airfoil and its internal geometry. External flow is from left to right. Internal flow enters from top and exits through three slots near the trailing edge.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Key features of the trailing edge region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Isometric views of the (a) Baseline, (b) Dolphin Nose, (c) Shield, and (e) Rounded Shield. A top view (d) of the Shield shows the regions of the lands that are overhung.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Isometric views of the (a) Baseline, (b) Dolphin Nose, (c) Shield, and (d) Rounded Shield geometries with reverse flow regions (purple) and streamlines (black)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normalized streamwise vorticity contours in a vertical and spanwise cross plane for the (a) Baseline, (b) Dolphin Nose, (c) Shield, and (d) Rounded Shield at (xxs)/h = 3.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Concentration contours with in-plane velocity vectors for a vertical and spanwise cross plane at (xxs)/h = 5.5. The reference arrows show in-plane velocity magnitude (Ut) normalized by the bulk averaged velocity at the slot exit (Ubulk). (a) Baseline, (b) Dolphin Nose, (c) Shield, and (d) Rounded Shield.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Top view of the surface effectiveness contour plots in the center slot for the (a) Baseline, (b) Dolphin Nose, (c) Shield, and (d) Rounded Shield geometries

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Spanwise averaged surface effectiveness for the baseline case and three redesigns at BR = 1.3. Also included are centerline effectiveness data from Holloway et al. [20] for two blowing ratios.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Spanwise averaged surface effectiveness, including land surfaces, for the baseline case and three redesigns at BR = 1.3

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In