Research Papers

The Effect of Acoustic Excitation on Boundary Layer Separation of a Highly Loaded LPT Blade

[+] Author and Article Information
Chiara Bernardini

Visiting Researcher
Department of Energy Engineering,
University of Florence,
Via di S. Marta, 3,
50121 Florence, Italy
e-mail: bernardini.3@osu.edu

Stuart I. Benton

e-mail: benton.53@osu.edu

Jeffrey P. Bons

e-mail: bons.2@osu.edu
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
The Ohio State University,
2300 West Case Road,
Columbus, OH 43235

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the Journal of Turbomachinery. Manuscript received July 2, 2012; final manuscript received August 30, 2012; published online June 24, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(5), 051001 (Jun 24, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1113; doi: 10.1115/1.4007834 History: Received July 02, 2012; Revised August 30, 2012

An experimental investigation of the effect of acoustic excitation on the boundary layer development of a highly loaded low-pressure turbine blade at low-Reynolds number is investigated. The aim of this work is to study the effect of excitation at select frequencies on separation which could give indications about active flow control exploitation. The front-loaded L2F blade is tested in a low-speed linear cascade. The uncontrolled flow presents a separation bubble on the suction surface at Reynolds numbers below 40,000. For these conditions, the instability of the shear layer is documented using hot-wire anemometry. A loudspeaker upstream of the cascade is directed towards the passage inlet section. A parametric study on the effect of amplitude and frequency is carried out. The effect of the excitation frequency is observed to delay separation for a range of frequencies. However, the control authority of sound is found to be most effective at the fundamental frequency of the shear layer. The amplitude of perturbation is significant in the outcome of control until a threshold value is reached. PIV measurements allow a deeper understanding of the mechanisms leading to the reduction of separation. Data has been acquired with a low inlet turbulence level (<1%) in order to provide a cleaner environment which magnifies the effects of the excitation frequency, and with an increased turbulence intensity level of 3% which is representative of more typical engine values. Integrated wake loss values are also presented to evaluate the effect on blade performance.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hourmouziadis, J., 1989, “Aerodynamic Design of Low Pressure Turbines,” AGARD Lecture Series 167.
Hodson, H. P., and Howell, R. J., 2005, “The Role of Transition in High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbines for Aeroengines,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 41(6), pp. 419–454. [CrossRef]
Zhang, X. F., Vera, M., Hodson, H. P., and Harvey, N., 2006, “Separation and Transition Control of an Aft-Loaded Ultra-High-Lift LP Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Number: Low-Speed Investigation,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(3), pp. 517–527. [CrossRef]
Volino, R. J., 2003, “Passive Flow Control on Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(4), pp. 754–764. [CrossRef]
Sieverding, C. H., Bagnera, C., Boege, A. C., CorderoAnton, J. A., and Luere, V., 2004, “Investigation of the Effectiveness of Various Types of Boundary Layer Transition Elements of Low Reynolds Number Turbine Bladings,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-54103. [CrossRef]
Bons, J. P., Sondergaard, R., and Rivir, R. B., 2002, “The Fluid Dynamics of LPT Blade Separation Control Using Pulsed Jets,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(1), pp. 77–85. [CrossRef]
Bons, J. P., Pluim, J., Gompertz, K., Bloxham, M., and Clark, J. P., 2012, “The Application of Flow Control to an Aft-Loaded Low Pressure Turbine Cascade with Unsteady Wakes,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(3), p. 031009. [CrossRef]
Volino, R. J., Kartuzova, O., and Ibrahim, M. B., 2011, “Separation Control on a Very High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(4), pp. 31–40. [CrossRef]
Postl, D., Balzer, W., and Fasel, H. F., 2011, “Control of Laminar Separation Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets: Direct Numerical Simulations,” J. Fluid Mech., 676, pp. 81–109. [CrossRef]
Volino, R. J., 2003, “Separation Control on Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Synthetic Vortex Generator Jets,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(4), pp. 765–777. [CrossRef]
Huang, J., Corke, T. C., and Thomas, F. O., 2006, “Plasma Actuators for Separation Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Blades,” AIAA J., 44(1), pp. 51–57. [CrossRef]
Lou, W., and Hourmouziadis, J., 2000, “Separation Bubbles Under Steady and Periodic-Unsteady Main Flow Conditions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122(4), pp. 634–643. [CrossRef]
Watmuff, J. H., 1999, “Evolution of a Wave Packet into Vortex Loops in a Laminar Separation Bubble,” J. Fluid Mech., 397, pp. 119–169. [CrossRef]
McAuliffe, B. R., and Yaras, M. I., 2010, “Transition Mechanisms in Separation Bubbles Under Low- and Elevated-Freestream Turbulence,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132(1), p. 011004. [CrossRef]
Baumann, J., Rose, M., Ries, T., Staudacher, S., and Rist, U., 2011, “Actuated Transition in an LP Turbine Laminar Separation: An Experimental Approach,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45852. [CrossRef]
Mack, M., Niehuis, R., and Fiala, A., 2011, “Parametric Study of Fluidic Oscillators for Use in Active Boundary Layer Control,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45073 [CrossRef].
Ahuja, K. K., Whipkey, R. R., and Jones, G. S., 1983, “Control of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow by Sound,” AIAA Paper No. 83-0726.
Greenblatt, D., and Wygnanski, I. J., 2000, “The Control of Flow Separation by Periodic Excitation,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 36(7), pp. 487–545. [CrossRef]
Nishioka, M., Asai, M., and Yoshida, S., 1990, “Control of Separation by Acoustic Excitation,” AIAA J., 28(11), pp. 1909–1915. [CrossRef]
Yarusevych, S., Sullivan, P. E., and Kawall, J. G., 2007, “Effect of Acoustic Excitation Amplitude on Airfoil Boundary Layer and Wake Development,” AIAA J., 45(4), pp. 760–771. [CrossRef]
Zaman, K. B. M. Q., and McKinzie, D. J., 1991, “Control of Laminar Separation Over Airfoils by Acoustic Excitation,” AIAA J., 29(7), pp. 1075–1083. [CrossRef]
Eldredge, R. G., and Bons, J. P., 2004, “Active Control of a Separating Boundary Layer With Steady Vortex Generating Jets—Detailed Flow Measurements,” AIAA Paper No. 2004-0751.
Lyall, M. E., King, P. I., Sondergaard, R., Clark, J. P., and McQuilling, M. W., 2011, “An Investigation of Reynolds Lapse Rate for Highly Loaded Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils With Forward and Aft Loading,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46328. [CrossRef]
McQuilling, M., Wolff, M., Fonov, S., Crafton, J., and Sondergaard., R., 2010, “Experimental Investigation of a High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Suction Surface,” AIAA J., 48(11), pp. 2465–2471. [CrossRef]
McAuliffe, B. R., and Yaras, M. I., 2008, “Numerical Study of the Instability Mechanisms Leading to Transition in Separation Bubbles,” ASME J. Turbomach., 130(2), p. 021006. [CrossRef]
Volino, R. J., 2002, “Separated Flow Transition Under Simulated Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Conditions—Part 1: Mean Flow and Turbulence Statistics,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(2), pp. 645–655. [CrossRef]
Dovgal, A. V., Kozlov, V. V., and Michalke, A., 1994, “Laminar Boundary Layer Separation: Instability and Associated Phenomena,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 30(1), pp. 61–94. [CrossRef]
Halfon, E., Nishri, B., Seifert, A., and Wygnanski, I., 2004, “Effects of Elevated Free-Stream Turbulence on Actively Controlled Separation Bubble,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 126(6), pp. 1015–1022. [CrossRef]
Bloxham, M. J., and Bons, J. P., 2010, “Combined Blowing and Suction to Control Both Midspan and Endwall Losses in a Turbomachinery Passage,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23552 [CrossRef].


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of test section and speaker positioning

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

PIV window reference system and hot-film positions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Amplitude of velocity fluctuation at excitation frequency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

PIV data for Re = 20,000, low- (upper) and high- (bottom) Tu. Left column: time averaged velocity magnitude, right column: Reynolds shear stress.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

PIV data for Re = 40,000, low- (upper) and high- (bottom) Tu. Left column: time averaged velocity magnitude, right column: Reynolds shear stress.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Premultiplied spectra at Re = 20,000 at the wall distance indicated by the dashed lines (upper: low-Tu, lower: high-Tu) on the velocity profile inset measured at this streamwise location

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Pitchwise distribution of wake loss coefficient, Re = 20,000, low-Tu

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Integrated wake loss coefficient normalized by the uncontrolled case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

PIV data for Re = 20,000, control at f = 110 Hz, low-Tu. Left: time averaged velocity magnitude; right: Reynolds shear stress.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Instantaneous PIV images at four instants: streamlines superposed on normalized spanwise vorticity contours (ωzCx/Ue). Left column: Re = 20,000, low-Tu, uncontrolled; right column Re = 20,000, low-Tu, control at f = 110 Hz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Hot-film raw velocity signal at boundary layer edge at axial position 2, Re = 20,000, low-Tu. Top: uncontrolled case, bottom: control at f = 110 Hz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Premultiplied PSD at boundary layer edge at axial position 2, Re = 20,000. Low- (left) and high- (right) Tu. Uncontrolled and control at f = 110 Hz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Instantaneous PIV images at four instants: streamlines superposed on normalized spanwise vorticity contours (ωzCx/Ue). Left column: Re = 20,000, high-Tu, uncontrolled; right column: Re = 20,000, high-Tu, control at f = 110 Hz.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Pitchwise distribution of wake loss coefficient, Re = 10,000, low- and high-Tu

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Range of most effective frequencies and relative normalized integrated wake losses for each Re

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Premultiplied PSD at boundary layer edge, axial position 2, Re = 10,000, 30,000, and 50,000 with low-Tu

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Amplitude effect on integrated wake loss coefficient normalized by the uncontrolled case, Re = 20,000 and f = 110 Hz




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In