Research Papers

An Experimental Study of Loss Sources in a Fan Operating With Continuous Inlet Stagnation Pressure Distortion

[+] Author and Article Information
Ewan J. Gunn

e-mail: ejg55@cam.ac.uk

Yann Colin

Whittle Laboratory,
University of Cambridge,
1 JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge CB3 0DY, UK

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the Journal of Turbomachinery. Manuscript received July 17, 2012; final manuscript received September 3, 2012; published online June 24, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(5), 051002 (Jun 24, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1151; doi: 10.1115/1.4007835 History: Received July 17, 2012; Revised September 03, 2012

The viability of boundary layer ingesting (BLI) engines for future aircraft propulsion is dependent on the ability to design robust, efficient engine fan systems for operation with continuously distorted inlet flow. A key step in this process is to develop an understanding of the specific mechanisms by which an inlet distortion affects the performance of a fan stage. In this paper, detailed full-annulus experimental measurements of the flow field within a low-speed fan stage operating with a continuous 60 deg inlet stagnation pressure distortion are presented. These results are used to describe the three-dimensional fluid mechanics governing the interaction between the fan and the distortion and to make a quantitative assessment of the impact on loss generation within the fan. A 5.3 percentage point reduction in stage total-to-total efficiency is observed as a result of the inlet distortion. The reduction in performance is shown to be dominated by increased loss generation in the rotor due to off-design incidence values at its leading edge, an effect that occurs throughout the annulus despite the localized nature of the inlet distortion. Increased loss in the stator row is also observed due to flow separations that are shown to be caused by whirl angle distortion at rotor exit. By addressing these losses, it should be possible to achieve improved efficiency in BLI fan systems.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Meridional view of the rig, to scale

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of rotor blade sections for the present rig and NASA Rotor 67 [28]. Hub, midspan, and tip are shown in black, red, and blue, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

36 deg sector of the measurement grid at station 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic view looking into the rig intake with a 60 deg gauze sector in place

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Stage total-to-static pressure rise and efficiency characteristics at constant rotor speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Contours of stagnation pressure upstream of the rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contours of static pressure upstream of the rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Contours of absolute whirl angle upstream of the rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contours of radial angle upstream of the rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Contours of axial velocity at rotor inlet and exit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Contours of stagnation and static pressure at rotor exit (station 3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Contours of absolute whirl angle and radial angle at rotor exit (station 3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Contours of stagnation pressure at stator exit (station 4) in clean and distorted flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Six tracked sectors overlaid on contours of stagnation pressure at rotor inlet and exit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Breakdown of lost work generation in the rotor with DC60 = 0.83 distortion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Absolute whirl angle, axial velocity and incidence variations at rotor inlet (station 2) in distorted flow. Incidence was defined positive for flow onto the pressure surface.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Examples of two rotor inlet velocity triangles in distorted flow at 70% span compared with the design condition (shown in gray)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Meridional view of the rotor showing the data used in the kinematic estimate of radial particle displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Cut along a blade-to-blade stream surface showing the kinematic estimate of circumferential particle displacement




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In