0
Research Papers

Optimization of a U-Bend for Minimal Pressure Loss in Internal Cooling Channels—Part I: Numerical Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Tom Verstraete

e-mail: tom.verstraete@vki.ac.be

Filippo Coletti

e-mail: coletti@vki.ac.be

Tony Arts

e-mail: arts@vki.ac.be
von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,
Turbomachinery and Propulsion Department,
Chaussée de Waterloo 72,
Rhode-Saint-Genèse 1640,Belgium

1Present address: Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

2Present address: Tractable Engineering, Brussels, Belgium.

3Present address: Geosea NV, Zwijndrecht, Belgium.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received January 22, 2012; final manuscript received October 25, 2012; published online June 28, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(5), 051015 (Jun 28, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1006; doi: 10.1115/1.4023030 History: Received January 22, 2012; Revised October 25, 2012

This two-part paper addresses the design of a U-bend for serpentine internal cooling channels optimized for minimal pressure loss. The total pressure loss for the flow in a U-bend is a critical design parameter, as it augments the pressure required at the inlet of the cooling system, resulting in a lower global efficiency. In this first part of the paper, the design methodology of the cooling channel is presented. The minimization of the total pressure loss is achieved by means of a numerical optimization method that uses a metamodel-assisted differential evolution algorithm in combination with an incompressible Navier–Stokes solver. The profiles of the internal and external side of the bend are parameterized using piece-wise Bezier curves. This allows for a wide variety of shapes, respecting the manufacturability constraints of the design. The pressure loss is computed by the Navier–Stokes solver, which is based on a two-equation turbulence model and is available from the open source software OpenFOAM. The numerical method predicts an improvement of 36% in total pressure drop with respect to a circular U-bend, mainly due to the reduction of the separated flow region along the internal side of the bend. The resulting design is subjected to experimental validation, presented in Part II of the paper.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Flow chart of the optimization algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Baseline geometry, definition of area in which the shape is allowed to change

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Parameterization of the outer curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Parameterization of the inner curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Zoom on the grid in the U-bend

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Artificial neural network (ANN) layout

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Prediction of mean value and confidence intervals by kriging

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Optimization result of De Jong F1 test function using an artificial neural network (ANN)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Optimization result of De Jong F1 test function using kriging

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Optimization result using differential evolution without metamodel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Optimization result using the artificial neural network

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Optimization result using kriging

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Optimal shape of the U-bend

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

D1 parameter versus pressure drop [Pa] for initial database (circle), ANN (square), and kriging (diamond) samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

D2 parameter versus pressure drop [Pa] for initial database (circle), ANN (square), and kriging (diamond) samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

D3 parameter versus pressure drop [Pa] for initial database (circle), ANN (square), and kriging (diamond) samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

y coordinate of the third control point of the third outer curve versus pressure drop [Pa] for initial database (circle), ANN (square), and kriging (diamond) samples

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In