0
Research Papers

Influence of Film Cooling Hole Angles and Geometries on Aerodynamic Loss and Net Heat Flux Reduction

[+] Author and Article Information
Chia Hui Lim

e-mail: chiahui.lim@cantab.net

Graham Pullan

e-mail: gp10006@cam.ac.uk
Whittle Laboratory,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB3 0DY, UK

Peter Ireland

Rolls-Royce plc,
PO Box 31,
Derby, UK
e-mail: peter.ireland@rolls-royce.com

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 7, 2012; final manuscript received November 18, 2012; published online June 28, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Turbomach 135(5), 051019 (Jun 28, 2013) (13 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1134; doi: 10.1115/1.4023088 History: Received July 07, 2012; Revised November 18, 2012

Turbine design engineers have to ensure that film cooling can provide sufficient protection to turbine blades from the hot mainstream gas, while keeping the losses low. Film cooling hole design parameters include inclination angle (α), compound angle (β), hole inlet geometry, and hole exit geometry. The influence of these parameters on aerodynamic loss and net heat flux reduction is investigated, with loss being the primary focus. Low-speed flat plate experiments have been conducted at momentum flux ratios of IR = 0.16, 0.64, and 1.44. The film cooling aerodynamic mixing loss, generated by the mixing of mainstream and coolant, can be quantified using a three-dimensional analytical model that has been previously reported by the authors. The model suggests that for the same flow conditions, the aerodynamic mixing loss is the same for holes with different α and β but with the same angle between the mainstream and coolant flow directions (angle κ). This relationship is assessed through experiments by testing two sets of cylindrical holes with different α and β: one set with κ = 35 deg, and another set with κ = 60 deg. The data confirm the stated relationship between α, β, κ and the aerodynamic mixing loss. The results show that the designer should minimize κ to obtain the lowest loss, but maximize β to achieve the best heat transfer performance. A suggestion on improving the loss model is also given. Five different hole geometries (α = 35.0 deg, β = 0 deg) were also tested: cylindrical hole, trenched hole, fan-shaped hole, D-Fan, and SD-Fan. The D-Fan and the SD-Fan have similar hole exits to the fan-shaped hole but their hole inlets are laterally expanded. The external mixing loss and the loss generated inside the hole are compared. It was found that the D-Fan and the SD-Fan have the lowest loss. This is attributed to their laterally expanded hole inlets, which lead to significant reduction in the loss generated inside the holes. As a result, the loss of these geometries is ≈ 50% of the loss of the fan-shaped hole at IR = 0.64 and 1.44.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Definitions of α, β, and κ (β ≠ 0 deg) (Lim et al. [5])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Definitions of α and φ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Control volume for the aerodynamic loss calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Measurement grid of the area traverse; Cp0 contours at the plane x/D = 5 for the baseline cylindrical holes (Geo 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Plan view of the test section flat plate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Side view of the experimental rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

ζtotal against IR; baseline cylindrical hole (Geo 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Cp0 and ξx contours at x/D = 5 for streamwise hole (Geo 2) and compound angle hole (Geo 7); IR = 0.64 and 1.44

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

ζmix against IR for cylindrical holes with κ = 60 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

ζhole against IR for cylindrical holes with κ = 35 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

ζhole against IR for cylindrical holes with κ = 60 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

ζmix against IR for cylindrical holes with κ = 35 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

NHFR¯¯ against IR; cylindrical holes with κ = 60.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

ζmix against IR for different geometries; α = 35.0 deg and β = 0.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

ζtotal against IR for different geometries; α = 35.0 deg and β = 0.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

ζhole against IR for different geometries; α = 35.0 deg and β = 0.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

NHFR¯¯ against IR for different geometries; α = 35.0 deg and β = 0.0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Drawings of the cylindrical holes (Geo 2, Geo 7), the trenched hole, the Fan, the D-Fan, and the SD-Fan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

ζmix against IR for cylindrical holes with κ = 60 deg; calculated with a uniform mixed-out profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

NHFR¯¯ against IR; cylindrical holes with κ = 35.0 deg

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In