Research Papers

Sensitivity Analysis on Turbine Blade Temperature Distribution Using Conjugate Heat Transfer Simulation

[+] Author and Article Information
Mohammad Alizadeh

e-mail: em.alizadeh@gmail.com

Ali Izadi

e-mail: aliizadi.ut@gmail.com
School of Mechanical Engineering,
College of Engineering,
University of Tehran,
Tehran, Iran

Alireza Fathi

K.N.T. University,
Tehran, Iran
e-mail: alireza.fathy@gmail.com

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the Journal of Turbomachinery. Manuscript received May 8, 2012; final manuscript received March 17, 2013; published online September 20, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Karen A. Thole.

J. Turbomach 136(1), 011001 (Sep 20, 2013) (13 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1045; doi: 10.1115/1.4024637 History: Received May 08, 2012; Revised March 17, 2013

Heat transfer parameters are the most critical variables affecting turbine blade life. Therefore, accurately predicting heat transfer parameters is essential. In this study, for precise prediction of the blade temperature distribution, a conjugate heat transfer procedure is used. This procedure involves three different physical aspects: flow and heat transfer in external domain and internal cooling passages and conduction within metal blade. For the external flow simulation and conduction within metal, three-dimensional solvers are used. However, three-dimensional modeling of blade cooling passages is time-consuming because of complex cooling passage geometries. Therefore, in the current work, a one-dimensional network method is used for the simulation of cooling passages. For validation of the numerical procedure, simulation results are compared with the available experimental data for a C3X vane. Results show good agreement against experimental data. The present paper investigates uncertainties of some parameters that affect turbine blade heat transfer, namely, (1) turbine inlet temperature and pressure, (2) upstream stator coolant mass flow rate and temperature, (3) rotor shroud heat transfer coefficient and fluid temperature over shroud, (4) rotor coolant inlet pressure and temperature (as a result of secondary air system), (5) blade metal thermal conductivity, and (6) blade coating thickness and thermal conductivity. Results show that turbine inlet temperature, pressure drop and temperature rise in the secondary air system (SAS) and coating parameters have significant effect on the blade temperature.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Conjugate heat transfer algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Solution algorithm of the 1D network method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

C3X geometry and the 1D elements of ten coolant channels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

View of numerical mesh on plane of constant spanwise coordinates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Predicted and measured pressure distribution on the midspan plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Nondimensional temperature distribution on the midspan plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Temperature contours of the vane on (a) pressure side (b) suction side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

CAD model of simulated blade and its internal cooling passages

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Schematic view of the rotor blade cooling passages network

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Boundary connections between 1D code and 3D model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Blade temperature distribution for the reference case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Flow field and metal temperature distribution at 70% span

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The diagram of different regions of blade. (a) Defined regions for averaging, (b) shroud surface on which HTC and bulk temperature is applied (light gray).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Computational domain and locations of boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The effects of turbine inlet temperature on the blade temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

The effects of turbine inlet pressure on the blade temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Blade temperature distribution versus vane coolant mass flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Blade temperature distribution versus its upstream vane coolant temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

The flow from outer casing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Blade temperature variation versus shroud heat transfer coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Blade temperature variation versus coolant temperature over shroud

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Blade temperature variation versus pressure drop at the coolant inlet

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Blade temperature variation versus coolant inlet temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Blade temperature variation versus blade metal thermal conductivity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Blade temperature variation versus coating thickness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

Blade temperature variation versus coating thermal conductivity




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In