0
Research Papers

Effect of Combustor Swirl on Transonic High Pressure Turbine Efficiency

[+] Author and Article Information
Paul F. Beard, Thomas Povey

Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Parks Road,
Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK

Andy D. Smith

Turbine Systems,
Rolls-Royce plc,
Moor Lane,
PCF-1, P.O. Box 31,
Derby DE24 8BJ, UK

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the Journal of Turbomachinery. Manuscript received June 8, 2012; final manuscript received March 25, 2013; published online September 20, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Kenichiro Takeishi.

J. Turbomach 136(1), 011002 (Sep 20, 2013) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-12-1064; doi: 10.1115/1.4024841 History: Received June 08, 2012; Revised March 25, 2013

This paper presents an experimental and computational study of the effect of inlet swirl on the efficiency of a transonic turbine stage. The efficiency penalty is approximately 1%, but it is argued that this could be recovered by correct design. There are attendant changes in capacity, work function, and stage total-to-total pressure ratio, which are discussed in detail. Experiments were performed using the unshrouded MT1 high-pressure turbine installed in the Oxford Turbine Research Facility (OTRF) (formerly at QinetiQ Farnborough): an engine scale, short duration, rotating transonic facility, in which M, Re, Tgas/Twall, and N/T01 are matched to engine conditions. The research was conducted under the EU Turbine Aero-Thermal External Flows (TATEF II) program. Turbine efficiency was experimentally determined to within bias and precision uncertainties of approximately ±1.4% and ±0.2%, respectively, to 95% confidence. The stage mass flow rate was metered upstream of the turbine nozzle, and the turbine power was measured directly using an accurate strain-gauge based torque measurement system. The turbine efficiency was measured experimentally for a condition with uniform inlet flow and a condition with pronounced inlet swirl. Full stage computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was performed using the Rolls-Royce Hydra solver. Steady and unsteady solutions were conducted for both the uniform inlet baseline case and a case with inlet swirl. The simulations are largely in agreement with the experimental results. A discussion of discrepancies is given.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lilley, D. G., 1977, “Swirl Flows in Combustion—A Review,” AIAA J., 15(8), pp. 1063–1078. [CrossRef]
Datta, A., and Som, S. K., 1999, “Combustions and Emissions Characteristics in a Gas Turbine Combustor at Different Pressure and Swirl Conditions,” J. Appl. Therm. Eng., 19, pp. 949–967. [CrossRef]
Benner, M. W., Sjolander, S. A., and Moustapha, S. H., 2006, “An Empirical Prediction Method for Secondary Losses in Turbines—Part II: A New Secondary Loss Correlation,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128, pp. 281–291. [CrossRef]
Benner, M. W., Sjolander, S. A., and Moustapha, S. H., 1997, “Influence of Leading-Edge Geometry on Profile Losses in Turbines at Off-Design Incidence: Experimental Results and an Improved Correlation,” ASME J. Turbomach., 119, pp. 1039–1046. [CrossRef]
Hodson, H. P., 1985, “Boundary-Layer Transition and Separation Near the Leading Edge of a High-Speed Turbine Blade,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 107, pp. 127–134. [CrossRef]
Hawthorne, W. R., 1955, “The Growth of Secondary Flow Circulation in Frictionless Flow,” Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 51(4), p. 737–743. [CrossRef]
Jones, T. V., Schultz, D. L., and Hendley, A., 1973, “On the Flow in an Isentropic Light Piston Tunnel,” Ministry of Defence, Aeronautical Research Council, London, R & M No. 3731.
Goodisman, M. I., Oldfield, M. L. G., Kingcombe, R. C., Jones, T. V., Ainsworth, R. W., and Brooks, A. J., 1992, “An Axial Turbobrake,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114, pp. 419–425. [CrossRef]
Qureshi, M. I., and Povey, T., 2011, “A Combustor-Representative Swirl Simulator for a Transonic Turbine Research Facility,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng., 225(7), pp. 737–748. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., and Yang, V., 2009, “Dynamics and Stability of Lean-Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Combustion,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 35(4), pp. 293–364. [CrossRef]
Beard, P. F., Povey, T., and Chana, K. S., 2009, “Turbine Efficiency Measurement Systems for the QinetiQ Turbine Test Facility,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132(1), p. 011002. [CrossRef]
Beard, P. F., Povey, T., and Smith, A., 2011, “Efficiency of an Unshrouded Transonic HP Turbine: Experimental Measurements in a Short Duration Facility and CFD Predictions,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A: J. Power and Energy, 225, pp. 1166–1179. [CrossRef]
Beard, P. F., and Povey, T., 2011, “Direct Shaft Torque Measurement in a Transient Turbine Facility,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 22(3), p. 035107. [CrossRef]
Beard, P. F., Povey, T., and Ireland, P. T., 2008, “Mass Flow Rate Measurement in a Transonic Test Facility With Inlet Temperature Distortion and Swirl,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 19(5), pp. 315–324. [CrossRef]
Povey, T., and Beard, P. F., 2008, “A Novel Experimental Technique for Accurate Mass Flow Rate Measurement,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 19(5), pp. 251–259. [CrossRef]
Chana, K. S., and Hilditch, M. A., 1995, “A Summary Datum Un-Cooled Measurements of the MT1 Single Stage High-Pressure Turbine in the DRA Pyestock Isentropic Light Piston Facility,” IMT Area 3 Turbine Project Report No. AER2-CT92-0044.
Chana, K. S., and Jones, T. V., 2002, “An Investigation on Turbine Tip and Shroud Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30554. [CrossRef]
Qureshi, M. I., Smith, A., and Povey, T., 2011, “HP Vane Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer in the Presence of Aggressive Inlet Swirl,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46037. [CrossRef]
Qureshi, M. I., Smith, A., and Povey, T., 2011, “Effect of Aggressive Inlet Swirl on Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics in an Unshrouded Transonic HP Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46038. [CrossRef]
Atkins, N. A., and Ainsworth, R. W., 2007, “Turbine Aerodynamic Performance Measurement Under Non-Adiabatic Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27143. [CrossRef]
Lapworth, B. L., 2004, “HYDRA-CFD: A Framework for Collaborative CFD Development,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific and Engineering Computation IC-SEC, Singapore, June 30–July 2.
Roach, P. E., 1987, “Generation of Nearly Isotropic Turbulence by Means of Grids,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 8(2), pp. 82–92. [CrossRef]
Chana, K. S., 1992, “Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics of a High Rim Speed Turbine Nozzle Guide Vane With Profiled End Walls,” ASME Paper No. 92-GT-243.
Moss, R., and Oldfield, M. L. G., 1991, “Measurements of Hot Combustor Turbulence Spectra,” ASME Paper No. 91-GT-351.
Pianko, M., and Wazelt, F., 1983, “Suitable Averaging-Techniques in Non-Uniform Internal Flows,” AGARD Advisory Report No. AGARD-AR-182.
Priddy, W. J., and Bayley, F. J., 1987, “Turbulence Measurements in Turbine Blade Passages and Implications for Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. 87-GT-195.
Kacker, S. C., and Okapuu, U., 1982, “A Mean Line Prediction Method for Axial Flow Turbine Efficiency,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 104, pp. 111–119. [CrossRef]
Povey, T., Sharpe, M., and Rawlinson, A., 2011, “Experimental Measurements of Gas Turbine Flow Capacity Using a Novel Transient Technique,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(1), p. 011005. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The Oxford Turbine Research Facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Measured swirl vector at HP vane inlet in the OTRF (vectors scaled by secondary velocity magnitude); (b) measured HP vane inlet whirl angles at 10%, 50%, and 90% span

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Area-surveys results of stage inlet total pressure: (a) without and (b) with inlet swirl generation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Area-survey results of total pressure at rotor exit: (a) near plane p03 and (b) far plane p04

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Vane and rotor computational meshes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Calculated radial changes in work function with inlet swirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Measured capacity of modern HP vane [28]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Predicted radial changes in vane profile loss coefficient and turbine efficiency with inlet swirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Vane surface isentropic Mach number distributions with and without inlet swirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Measured and predicted changes in NGV isentropic Mach number distributions at 10%, 50%, and 90% span

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Predicted change in total pressure loss coefficient at vane exit with inlet swirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Predicted change in vane exit conditions with inlet swirl and effect on work function

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Predicted changes in rotor inlet relative conditions with inlet swirl

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In