Research Papers

Small Wind Turbines in the Built Environment: Influence of Flow Inclination on the Potential Energy Yield

[+] Author and Article Information
Serena Bianchi

e-mail: bianchi@vega.de.unifi.it

Alessandro Bianchini

e-mail: bianchini@vega.de.unifi.it

Giovanni Ferrara

e-mail: giovanni.ferrara@unifi.it
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
Via di Santa Marta,
3 Firenze 50139, Italy

Lorenzo Ferrari

National Research Council of Italy,
Via Madonna del Piano 10,
Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
e-mail: lorenzo.ferrari@iccom.cnr.it

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received June 18, 2013; final manuscript received July 22, 2013; published online September 26, 2013. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 136(4), 041013 (Sep 26, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: TURBO-13-1101; doi: 10.1115/1.4025169 History: Received June 18, 2013; Revised July 22, 2013

Increasing interest is being paid by architects, project developers and local governments to understanding where small wind turbines can effectively be exploited to provide delocalized power in the built environment. The wind conditions in the rooftop area of buildings in urban locations are, however, very complex and the real adaptability of wind turbines to these environments is not yet tested both in terms of real producibility and of structural compatibility with the building themselves. In these installations, in particular, the flow that incomes on the rotor is often inclined with respect to the horizontal direction due to the interaction with the building façade and the roof. A correct estimation of the impact of an inclined flow on the performance of horizontal-axis wind turbines, therefore, becomes a very relevant issue to correctly predict the potential energy yield of a machine. To this purpose, a simulation code based on a blade element momentum (BEM) approach was developed and validated by means of experimental data found in the literature. The code was then used to evaluate the energetic suitability of a small-size wind turbine installation in the rooftop of a building in a conventional European city. A numerical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was carried out to characterize the flow field in the rooftop area of different buildings. The flow velocity modulus and direction were calculated for several oncoming wind profiles: The results were projected into an available wind power curve in the rooftop of the building. The effective energy-yield capabilities were then corrected using the model for the flow inclination as a function of the specific flow conditions in the rooftop area. The results were finally exploited to analyze the energy-oriented feasibility of an installation in a similar context.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Global Wind Energy Council, 2011, “Global Wind Report,” GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, Technical Report.
Mertens, S., 2006, Wind Energy in the Built Environment, Multi-Science, Brentwood, UK.
Dayan, E., 2006, “Wind Energy in Buildings: Power Generation From Wind in the Urban Environment—Where It Is Needed Most,” Refocus, 72(2), pp. 33–38. [CrossRef]
Beller, C., 2009, “Urban Wind Energy—State of the Art 2009,” Risø Laboratory—DTU, Roskilde, Denmark, Tech. Rep. No. Risø-R-1668(EN).
Balduzzi, F., Bianchini, A., and Ferrari, L., 2012, “Microeolic Turbines in the Built Environment: Influence of the Installation Site on the Potential Energy Yield,” Renew. Energy, 45, pp. 163–174. [CrossRef]
Balduzzi, F., Bianchini, A., Carnevale, E. A., Ferrari, L., and Magnani, S., 2012, “Feasibility Analysis of a Darrieus Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Installation in the Rooftop of a Building,” Appl. Energy, 97, pp. 921–929. [CrossRef]
Syngellakis, K., 2006, “Urban Wind Turbines: Development of the UK Market,” Proc. of the European Wind Energy Conference 2006, Athens, Greece, February 27–March 2.
Banks, D., Cochran, B., Denoon, R., and Wood, G., 2008, “Harvesting Wind Power From Tall Buildings,” Proceedings of the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat 8th World Congress (CTBUH), Dubai, UAE, March 3–5, pp. 320–327.
Gryning, S. E., and Batchvarova, E., 2008, “Modelling of the Urban Wind Profile,” Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XIX, (NATO Science for Peace and Security Series), NATO, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 18–27.
Burton, T., Sharpe, D., Jenkins, N., and Bossanyi, E., 2001, Wind Energy Handbook, J. Wiley & Sons Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Tsalicoglou, C., Barber, S., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S., 2012, “Effect of Flow Inclination on Wind Turbine Performance,” Proc. ASME Turbo Expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 11–15, Paper No. GT2012-68473.
Wood, D., 2011, Small Wind Turbines: Analysis, Design, and Application, Springer, London.
Pedersen, T. F., Gjerding, T., Ingham, P., Enevoldsen, P., Hansen, J. K., and Jørgensen, H. K., 2002, “Wind Turbine Power Performance Verification in Complex Terrain and Wind Farms,” Risø Laboratory—DTU, Roskilde, Denmark, Tech. Rep. No. Risø-R-1330(EN).
Mertens, S., van Kuik, G., and van Bussel, G., 2003, “Performance of an H-Darrieus in the Skewed Flow on a Roof,” ASME J. Solar Energy Eng., 125, pp. 433–440. [CrossRef]
Simão Ferreira, C. J., van Bussel, G., and van Kuik, G., 2006, “An Analytical Method to Predict the Variation in Performance of a H-Darrieus in Skewed Flow and Its Experimental Validation,” Proc. of the European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC2006), Athens, Greece, February 27–March 2.
Simão Ferreira, C. J., van Bussel, G., and van Kuik, G., “Wind Tunnel Hotwire Measurements, Flow Visualization and Thrust Measurement of a VAWT in Skew,” Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 9–12, AIAA Paper No. 2006-1368. [CrossRef]
Bianchini, A., Ferrari, L., and Magnani, S., 2012, “On the Effects of a Skewed Flow on the Performance of a Three-Bladed H-Darrieus Turbine: Experimental and Theoretical Analyses,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Energy (ICAE 2012), Suzhou, China, July 5–8
Sharpe, T., and Proven, G., 2010, “Crossflex: Concept and Early Development of a True Building Integrated Wind Turbine,” Energy Build., 42, pp. 2365–2375. [CrossRef]
Wineur Project, 2007, “Urban Wind Turbines Guidelines for Small Wind Turbines in the Built Environment,” Tech. Rep., www.urbanwind.org, accessed September 18, 2012.
Manwell, J. F., McGowan, J. G., and Rogers, A. L., 2009, Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application, 2nd ed., Wiley, London.
Hansen, M. O. L., Sørensen, J. N., Voutsinas, S., Sørensen, N., and Madsen, H. A., 2006, “State of the Art in Wind Turbine Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 42(4), pp. 285–330. [CrossRef]
Xu, G., and Sankar, L. N., 1999, “Computational Study of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” Proc. of the 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 11–14, AIAA Paper No. 99-0042. [CrossRef]
Buhl, M. L., 2005, “A New Empirical Relationship Between Thrust Coefficient and Induction Factor for the Turbulent Windmill State,” NREL, Golden, CO, Tech. Rep. No. TP-500-36834.
Shen, W. Z., Mikkelsen, R., Sorensen, J. N., and Bak, C., 2005, “Tip Loss Corrections for Wind Turbine Computations,” Wind Energy, 8, pp. 457–475. [CrossRef]
Buckland, H. C., Masters, I., Chapman, J. C., and Orme, J. A. C., 2001, “Blade Element Momentum Theory in Modelling Tidal Stream Turbines,” Proc. of the 18th UK Conference on Computational Mechanics (ACME-UK), Southampton, UK, March 29–31,
Du, Z., and Selig, M. S., 1998, “A 3-D Stall-Delay Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Performance Prediction,” Proc. of the 1998 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, January 12–15, AIAA Paper No. 98-0021. [CrossRef]
Wang, T., and Coton, F. N., 2000, “Prediction of the Unsteady Aerodynamic Characteristics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Including Three-Dimensional Effects,” Proc. IMechE A: J. Power Energy, pp. 385–400.
Bianchi, F. D., de Battista, H., and Mantz, R. J., 2007, Wind Turbine Control Systems. Principles, Modelling and Gain Scheduling Design, Springer, London.
Rosas, P., 2003, “Dynamic Influences of Wind Power in Power System,” Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark.
Butterfield, C. P., Musial, W. P., Scott, G. N., and Simms, D. A., 1992, “NREL Combined Experimental Final Report: Phase II,” NREL, Golden, CO, Tech. Rep. No. TP-442-4807.
Hand, M. M., and Simms, D. A., 1997, “Final Report of IEA annex XIV: Field Rotor Aerodynamics,” Energy Research Center in the Netherlands (ECN), Petten, The Netherlands, Tech. Rep. No. ECN C-97-027.
Lindenburg, C., 2003, “Investigation Into Rotor Blade Aerodynamics—Analysis of the Stationary Measurements on the UAE Phase-VI Rotor in the NASA-Ames Wind Tunnel,” Energy Research Center in the Netherlands (ECN), Petten, The Netherlands, Tech. Rep. No. ECN C-03-025.
Jonkman, J. M., 2003, “Modeling of the UAE Wind Turbine for Refinement of FAST AD BEM Theory: How to Take Into Account the Radial Flow Inside of a 1-D Numerical Code,” NREL, Golden, CO, Tech. Rep. No. TP-500-34755, pp. 05–28.
Lanzafame, R., and Messina, M., 2012, “BEM Theory: How to Take Into Account the Radial Flow Inside of a 1-D Numerical Code,” Renew. Energy, 39, pp. 440–446. [CrossRef]
Ackerman, M. C., 1992, “Yaw Modelling of Small Wind Turbines,” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 39, pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
de Vries, O., 1979, Fluid Dynamic Aspects of Wind Energy Conversion, AGARD, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, Tech. Rep. AGARD-AG-243.
Hansen, A. C., 1992, “Yaw Dynamics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” NREL, Golden, CO, Tech. Rep. No. TP-442-4822.
Schepers, J. G., 2008, “IEA Annex XX: Comparison Between Calculations and Measurements on a Wind Turbine in Yaw in the NASA-Ames Wind Tunnel,” Tech. Rep. No. ECN-E-07-072.
Ratti, C., Di Sabatino, S., Caton, F., Britter, R., and Brown, M., 2002, “Analysis of 3-D Urban Databases With Respect to Pollution Dispersion for a Number of European and American Cities,” Water Air Soil Poll., 2(5–6), pp. 459–469. [CrossRef]
Martin, C. L., Longley, I. D., Dorsey, J. R., Thomas, J. R., Gallagher, M. W., and Nemitz, E., 2009, “Ultrafine Particle Fluxes Above Four Major European Cities,” Atmospher. Env., 43, pp. 4714–4721. [CrossRef]
Engineering Science Data Unit, 1984, “Strong Winds in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Part 1: Mean-Hourly Wind Speeds,” ESDU 82026 With Amendment A and B, London.
OpenCFD Ltd., 2013, “OpenFoam®–The Open Source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Toolbox,” http://www.openfoam.com, accessed January 6, 2013.
Franke, J., Hirsch, C., Jensen, A. G., Krüs, H. W., Schatzmann, M., Westbury, P. S., Miles, S. D., Wisse, J. A., and Wright, N. G., 2004, “Recommendations on the Use of CFD in Wind Engineering,” Proc. of the International Conference on Urban Wind Engineering and Building Aerodynamics, von Karman Institute, Saint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium, May 5–7.
Franke, J., Hellsten, A., Schlünzen, H., and Carissimo, B., 2007, “Best Practice Guideline for the CFD Simulation of Flows in the Urban Environment,” COST Office, Brussels, Belgium, Tech. Rep.
Tominaga, T., Mochida, A., Yoshie, R., Kataoka, H., Nozu, T., Yoshikawa, M., and Shirawasa, T., 2008, “AIJ Guidelines for Practical Applications of CFD to Pedestrian Wind Environment Around Buildings,” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 96(10–11), pp. 1749–1761. [CrossRef]
Bianchi, S., 2012, “Effects of a Misaligned Flow on the Performance of an Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine,” M.Sc. thesis in Energy Engineering, University of Florence, Italy, July 2012.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Example of the flow behavior approaching the rooftop of a high building (ideal central section of the building, far from corners)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

BEM modeling scheme of a horizontal-axis wind turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Code validation on literature data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flow-rotor interaction in an inclined flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flow components acting on the blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Code validation: power coefficient variation in inclined flow for NREL phase II (Hansen [36])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Code validation: normal force during revolution at 80% span of NREL phase VI (Schepers [37])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Investigated configuration (turbine not in scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Modified wind distribution in a-type cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Energy potential variation: case 1a versus case 1c (short building-medium skew angle in the rooftop)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Energy potential variation: case 2a versus case 2b (high building with acceleration-high skew angle in the rooftop)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Energy potential variation: cases 2a, 2d, and 2e (high building but with different rooftop conditions due to the surrounding buildings)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In