0
Research Papers

An Experimental Study of Mist/Air Film Cooling on a Flat Plate With Application to Gas Turbine Airfoils—Part I: Heat Transfer

[+] Author and Article Information
Lei Zhao

e-mail: leizhao.me@gmail.com;
lei.zhao@dupont.com

Ting Wang

e-mail: twang@uno.edu
Energy Conversion and Conservation Center,
University of New Orleans,
New Orleans, LA 70148

1Currently at E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE 19805.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received August 15, 2013; final manuscript received August 30, 2013; published online January 2, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 136(7), 071006 (Jan 02, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: TURBO-13-1189; doi: 10.1115/1.4025736 History: Received August 15, 2013; Revised August 30, 2013

Film cooling is a cooling technique widely used in high-performance gas turbines to protect the turbine airfoils from being damaged by hot flue gases. Motivated by the need to further improve film cooling in terms of both cooling effectiveness and coolant coverage area, the mist/air film cooling scheme is investigated through experiments in this study. A small amount of tiny water droplets (7 wt. %) with an average diameter about 5 μm (mist) is injected into the cooling air to enhance the cooling performance. A wind tunnel system and test facility is specifically built for this unique experiment. A phase Doppler particle analyzer (PDPA) system is employed to measure the droplet size, velocity, and turbulence information. An infrared camera and thermocouples are both used for temperature measurements. Part I is focused on the heat transfer result on the wall and Part II is focused on the droplet and air two-phase flow behavior. Mist film cooling performance is evaluated and compared against air-only film cooling in terms of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and film coverage. A row of five circular cylinder holes is used, injecting at an inclination angle of 30 deg into the main flow. For the 0.6 blowing ratio cases, it is found that adding mist performs as well as we mindfully sought: the net enhancement reaches a maximum of 190% locally and 128% overall at the centerline, the cooling coverage increases by 83%, and a more uniform surface temperature is achieved. The latter is critical for reducing wall thermal stresses. When the blowing ratio increases from 0.6 to 1.4, both the cooling coverage and net enhancement are reduced to below 60%. Therefore, it is more beneficial to choose a relatively low blowing ratio to keep the coolant film attached to the surface when applying the mist cooling. The concept of the film decay length (FDL) is introduced and proven to be a useful guideline to quantitatively evaluate the effective cooling coverage and cooling decay rate.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the mist cooling experimental facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Contours of the adiabatic cooling effectiveness for (a) case 1, M = 0.6, air-only film, and (b) case 2, M = 0.6, mist/air film

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Contour of the adiabatic cooling effectiveness for (a) case 3, M = 1.0, air-only film, and (b) case 4, M = 1.0, mist/air film

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of the present adiabatic cooling effectiveness (left coordinate) and net enhancement (right coordinate) with the experimental data from Refs. [15] and [16] for (a) M = 0.6, centerline data, and (b) M = 0.6, spanwise averaged data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of the adiabatic cooling effectiveness of cases 3 and 4 (left coordinate) and net enhancement (right coordinate) with the experimental data from Goldstein et al. [15] and Rhee et al. [16] for (a) M = 1.0, centerline data, and (b) M = 1.0, spanwise averaged data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the adiabatic cooling effectiveness of cases 5 and 6 (left coordinate) and net enhancement (right coordinate) with the experimental data from Rhee et al. [16] for (a) M = 0.6, centerline data (b) M = 0.6, spanwise averaged data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Contour of the adiabatic cooling effectiveness for (a) case 5, M = 1.4, air film only, and (b) case 6, M = 1.4, mist/air film

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In