0
Research Papers

Development of a Turning Mid Turbine Frame With Embedded Design—Part I: Design and Steady Measurements

[+] Author and Article Information
Emil Göttlich

e-mail: emil.goettlich@tugraz.at

Franz Heitmeir

Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz A-8010, Austria

1Currently at Whittle Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge.

2Currently at Dipartimento di Macchine, Sistemi Energetici e Trasporti, Universita di Genova.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received August 21, 2013; final manuscript received October 20, 2013; published online January 2, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Rolf Sondergaard.

J. Turbomach 136(7), 071008 (Jan 02, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: TURBO-13-1194; doi: 10.1115/1.4025949 History: Received August 21, 2013; Revised October 20, 2013

The paper presents a new setup for the two-stage two-spool facility located at the Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery and Machine Dynamics (ITTM) of Graz University of Technology. The rig was designed in order to simulate the flow behavior of a transonic turbine followed by a counter-rotating low pressure (LP) stage like the spools of a modern high bypass aeroengine. The meridional flow path of the machine is characterized by a diffusing S-shaped duct between the two rotors. The role of turning struts placed into the mid turbine frame is to lead the flow towards the LP rotor with appropriate swirl. Experimental and numerical investigations performed on the setup over the last years, which were used as baseline for this paper, showed that wide chord vanes induce large wakes and extended secondary flows at the LP rotor inlet flow. Moreover, unsteady interactions between the two turbines were observed downstream of the LP rotor. In order to increase the uniformity and to decrease the unsteady content of the flow at the inlet of the LP rotor, the mid turbine frame was redesigned with two zero-lifting splitters embedded into the strut passage. In this first part of the paper the design process of the splitters and its critical points are presented, while the time-averaged field is discussed by means of five-hole probe measurements and oil flow visualizations. The comparison between the baseline case and the embedded design configuration shows that the new design is able to reduce the flow gradients downstream of the turning struts, providing a more suitable inlet condition for the low pressure rotor. The improvement in the flow field uniformity is also observed downstream of the turbine and it is, consequently, reflected in an enhancement of the LP turbine performance. In the second part of this paper the influence of the embedded design on the time-resolved field is investigated.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Dominy, R. G., Kirkham, D. A., and Smith, A. D., 1998, “Flow Development Through Inter-Turbine Diffusers,” ASME J. Turbomach., 120, pp. 298–304. [CrossRef]
Dominy, R. G., and Kirkham, D. A., 1996, “The Influence of Blade Wakes on the Performance of Inter-Turbine Diffusers,” ASME J. Turbomach., 118, pp. 347–352. [CrossRef]
Göttlich, E., 2011, “Research on the Aerodynamics of Intermediate Turbine Diffusers,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 47, pp. 249–279. [CrossRef]
Miller, R. J., Moss, R. W., Ainsworth, R. W., and Harvey, N. W., 2004, “The Effect of an Upstream Turbine on a Low-Aspect Ratio Vane,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004, Vienna, Austria, June 14–17, ASME Paper No. GT2004-54017. [CrossRef]
Marn, A., Göttlich, E., Cadrecha, D., and Pirker, H. P., 2009, “Shorten the Intermediate Turbine Duct Length by Applying an Integrated Concept,” ASME J. Turbomach., 131(4), p. 041014. [CrossRef]
Santner, C., Paradiso, B., Malzacher, F., Hoeger, M., Hubinka, J., and Göttlich, E., 2011, “Evolution of the Flow Through a Turning Mid Turbine Frame Applied Between a Transonic HP Turbine Stage and a Counter-Rotating LP Turbine,” Proceedings of 9th European Turbomachinery Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, March 21–25, Paper No. 110.
Paradiso, B., Santner, C., Hubinka, J., and Göttlich, E., 2011, “Turning Mid Turbine Frame Behaviour for Different HP Turbine Outflow Conditions,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 6–10, ASME Paper No. GT2011-46502. [CrossRef]
Pratt-&-Whitney, “Pure Power pw1000g Geared Turbofan Engine,” http://www.purepowerengine.com/
Seda, J., 2004, “Aircraft Engine With Inter-Turbine Engine Frame,” U.S. Patent No. 6708482 b2, http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6708482.html
Lengani, D., Santner, T., Spataro, R., Paradiso, B., and Göttlich, E., 2012, “Experimental Investigation of the Unsteady Flow Field Downstream of a Counter-Rotating Two-Spool Turbine Rig,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 11–15, ASME Paper No. GT2012-68583. [CrossRef]
Lengani, D., Santner, C., Spataro, R., and Göttlich, E., 2012, “Analysis Tools for the Unsteady Interactions in a Counter-Rotating Two-Spool Turbine Rig,” Experiment. Therm. Fluid Sci., 42, pp. 248–257. [CrossRef]
Lavagnoli, S., Yasa, T., Paniagua, G., Duni, S., and Castillon, L., “Aerodynamic Analysis of an Innovative Low Pressure Vane Placed in a S-Shape Duct,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(1), p. 011013. [CrossRef]
Yasa, T., Lavagnoli, S., and Paniagua, G., 2011, “Impact of a Multi-Splitter Vane Configuration on the Losses in a 1.5 Turbine Stage,” Proc. IMechE, 225, pp. 964–974. [CrossRef]
Santner, C., Göttlich, E., Wallin, F., and Hoeger, M., 2011, “Experimental Investigation of Turning Mid Turbine Frame Designs,” Proceedings of ISABE 2011, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 11–15, ISABE Paper No. ISABE-2011-1710.
Spataro, R., Santner, C., Lengani, D., and Göttlich, E., 2012, “On the Flow Evolution Through a LP Turbine With Wide-Chord Vanes in an S-Shaped Channel,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 11–15, ASME Paper No. GT2012-68178. [CrossRef]
Spataro, R., Göttlich, E., Santner, C., and Heitmeir, F., 2013, “A Numerical Comparison on the Aerodynamic Performances of a Two-Stage Two-Spool Turbine Facility Predicted by Steady and Unsteady Simulations,” Proceedings of 10th European Turbomachinery Conference, Lappenranta, Finland, April 21–25, Paper No. 39.
Lengani, D., Selic, T., Spataro, R., Marn, A., and Göttlich, E., 2012, “Analysis of the Unsteady Flow Field in the Turbines by Means of Modal Decomposition,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 11–15, ASME Paper No. GT2012-68582. [CrossRef]
Spataro, R., Göttlich, E., Lengani, D., Faustmann, C., and Heitmeir, F., 2013, “Development of a Turning Mid Turbine Frame With Embedded Design—Part II: Unsteady Measurements,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2013, San Antonio, TX, June 11–15, ASME Paper No. GT2013-95280. [CrossRef]
Faustmann, C., Lengani, D., Spataro, R., Marn, A., Göttlich, E., and Heitmeir, F., 2013, “Experimental Investigation of the Noise Generation and Propagation for Different Turning Mid Turbine Frame Setups in a Two-Stage Two-Spool Test Turbine,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2013, San Antonio, TX, June 3–7, ASME Paper No. GT2013-95698. [CrossRef]
Erhard, J., and Gehrer, A., 2000, “Design and Construction of a Transonic Test-Turbine Facility,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2000, Munich, Germany, May 8–11, Paper No. 2000-GT-480.
Hubinka, J., Santner, C., Paradiso, B., Malzacher, F., and Göttlich, E., 2009, “Design and Construction of a Two Shaft Test Turbine for Investigation of Mid Turbine Frame Flows,” Proceedings of ISABE 2009, Montreal, QC, Canada, ASME Paper No. ISABE-2009-1293.
Hubinka, J., Paradiso, B., Santner, C., Pirker, H. P., and Göttlich, E., 2011, “Design and Operation of a Two Spool High Pressure Test Turbine Facility,” Proceeding of the 9th ETC Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, March 21–25, pp. 1531–1540.
Dénos, R., andPaniagua, G., eds., 2005, Effects of Aerodynamic Unsteadiness in Axial Turbomachines ( VKI Lecture Series), von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium, LS 2005-03.
Persico, G., Mora, A., Gaetani, P., and Savini, M., 2010, “Unsteady Aerodynamics of a Low Aspect Ratio Turbine Stage: Modelling Issues and Flow Physics,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010, Glasgow, UK, June 14–18, ASME Paper No. GT2010-22927. [CrossRef]
Dénos, R., Arts, T., Paniagua, G., Michelassi, V., and Martelli, F., 2001, “Investigation of the Unsteady Rotor Aerodynamics in a Transonic Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123, pp. 81–89. [CrossRef]
Urbassik, R. M., Wolff, J. M., and Polanka, M. D., 2006, “Unsteady Aerodynamics and Interactions Between a High-Pressure Turbine Vane and Rotor,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128, pp. 35–42. [CrossRef]
Schennach, O., Woisetschläger, J., Paradiso, B., Persico, G., and Gaetani, P., 2010, “Three Dimensional Clocking Effects in a One and a Half Stage Transonic Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132(1), p. 011019. [CrossRef]
Miller, R. J., Moss, R. W., Ainsworth, R. W., and Horwood, C. K., 2003, “Time-Resolved Vane-Rotor Interaction in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125, pp. 1–13. [CrossRef]
Gaetani, P., Persico, G., Dossena, V., and Osnaghi, C., 2007, “Investigation of the Flow Field in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage for Two Stator-Rotor Axial Gaps—Part 2: Unsteady Flow Field,” ASME J. Turbomach., 129, pp. 580–590. [CrossRef]
Chaluvadi, V. S. P. I., Kalfas, A., Banieghbal, M. R., Hodson, H. P., and Denton, J. D. “Blade-Row Interaction in a High-Pressure Turbine,” AIAA J. Propul. Power, 17(4), pp. 892–901. [CrossRef]
Persico, G., Gaetani, P., Dossena, V., D'Ippolito, G., and Osnaghi, C., 2009, “On the Definition of the Secondary Flow in Three-Dimensional Cascades,” IMechE J. Power Energy, 223, pp. 667–676. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Two-stage—two-spool facility at the ITTM and measurement section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Pressure taps position at the hub and casing endwalls

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Plane C—five-hole probe measurements at the duct inlet (view from downstream)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Static pressure measurements within the strut passage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Plane E—five-hole probe measurements at the LP rotor inlet flow (view from downstream)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Embedded design concept: schematization of the strut secondary vortex suppression and splitter vortex generation mechanisms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Plane F—five-hole probe measurements at the LP rotor exit flow (view from downstream). L3 loss core due to the strut passage vortex. L4 trace of the splitter B wake.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Losses through the duct for baseline and embedded design setups

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In