0
Research Papers

Unsteady Half-Annulus Computational Fluid Dynamics Calculations of Thermal Migration Through a Cooled 2.5 Stage High-Pressure Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
James A. Tallman

General Electric Global Research,
Niskayuna, NY 12309

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received June 30, 2013; final manuscript received December 31, 2013; published online February 18, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 136(8), 081012 (Feb 18, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-13-1119; doi: 10.1115/1.4026507 History: Received June 30, 2013; Revised December 31, 2013

This paper presents an industrial perspective on the potential use of multiple-airfoil row unsteady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations in high-pressure turbine design cycles. A sliding-mesh unsteady CFD simulation is performed for a high-pressure turbine section of a modern aviation engine at conditions representative of engine take-off. The turbine consists of two stages plus a center-frame strut upstream of the low-pressure turbine. The airfoil counts per row are such that a half-annulus model domain must be simulated for periodicity. The total model domain size is 170 MM computational grid points and the solution requires approximately nine days of clock time on 6288 processing cores of a Cray XE6 supercomputer. Airfoil and endwall cooling flows are modeled via source term additions to the flow. The endwall flowpath cavities and their purge/leakage flows are resolved in the computational meshes to an extent. The time-averaged temperature profile solution is compared with static rake data taken in engine tests. The unsteady solution shows a considerable improvement in agreement with the rake data, compared with a steady-state solution using circumferential mixing planes. Passage-to-passage variations in the gas temperature prediction are present in the 2nd stage, due to nonperiodic alignment between the nozzle vanes and rotor blades. These passage-to-passage differences are quantified and contrasted.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Adamczyk, J. J., 2000, “Aerodynamic Analysis of Multistage Turbomachinery Flows in Support of Aerodynamic Design,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122(2), pp. 189–217. [CrossRef]
Praisner, T. J., Grover, E., Mocanu, R., Jurek, R., and Gacek, R., 2010, “Predictions of Unsteady Interactions Between Closely Coupled HP and LP Turbines With Co- and Counter-Rotation,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23681. [CrossRef]
Tucker, P. G., 2011, “Computation of Unsteady Turbomachinery Flows—Part 1: Progress and Challenges,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 47(7), pp. 522–545. [CrossRef]
Atkins, N. R., Thorpe, S. J., and Ainsworth, R. W., 2012, “Unsteady Effects on Transonic Turbine Blade Tip Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(6), p. 061002. [CrossRef]
Qureshi, I., Beretta, A., Chana, K., and Povey, T., 2012, “Effect of Aggressive Inlet Swirl on Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics in an Unshrouded Transonic HP Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(6), p. 061023. [CrossRef]
Shyam, V., Ameri, A., Luk, D. F., and Chen, J. P., “3-D Unsteady Simulation of a Modern High Pressure Turbine Stage Using Phase Lag Periodicity: Analysis of Flow and Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-60322. [CrossRef]
Shyam, V., Ameri, A., and Chen, J. P., 2011, “Analysis of Unsteady Tip and Endwall Heat Transfer in a Highly Loaded Transonic Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(4), p. 041022. [CrossRef]
Simone, S., Montomoli, F., Martelli, F., Chana, K. S., Qureshi, I., and Povey, T., 2010, “Analysis on the Effect of a Non-Uniform Inlet Profile on Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Turbine Stages,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23526. [CrossRef]
Basol, A. M., Jenny, P., Ibrahim, J. M., Kalfas, A., and Abhari, R. S., 2011, “Hot Streak Migration in a Turbine Stage: Integrated Design to Improve Aerothermal Performance,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(6), p. 061901. [CrossRef]
Ong, J., Miller, R. J., and Uchida, S., 2012, “The Effect of Coolant Injection on the Endwall Flow of a High Pressure Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(5), p. 051003. [CrossRef]
Ong, J. and Miller, R. J., 2012, “Hot Streak and Vane Coolant Migration in a Downstream Rotor,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(5), p. 051002. [CrossRef]
Felten, F. N., Kapetanovic, S., Holmes, D. G., and Ostrowski, M., 2008, “Gas Turbine Temperature Prediction Using Unsteady CFD and Realistic Non-Uniform 2D Combustor Exit Properties,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50275. [CrossRef]
An, B.-T., Liu, J.-J., Jiang, H.-D., 2008, “Numerical Investigation on Unsteady Effects of Hot Streak on Flow and Heat Transfer in a Turbine Stage,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50415. [CrossRef]
Kim, S. I., Rahman, M. D., and Hassan, I., 2009, “Effect of Turbine Inlet Temperature on Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-60143. [CrossRef]
Sipatov, A., Gomzikov, L., Latyshev, V., and Gladysheva, N., 2009, “Three-Dimensional Heat Transfer Analysis of High Pressure Turbine Blade,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59163. [CrossRef]
An, B.-T., Liu, J.-J., Jiang, H.-D., 2009, “Combined Unsteady Effects of Hot Streak and Trailing Edge Coolant Ejection in a Turbine Stage,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59473. [CrossRef]
Rahman, M. H., Kim, S. I., Hassan, I., and El Ayoubi, C., 2010, “Unsteady Tip Leakage Flow Characteristics and Heat Transfer on Turbine Blade Tip and Casing,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-22104. [CrossRef]
Chang, D. and Tavoularis, S., 2009, “Unsteady Vortices and Blade Loading in a High-Pressure Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59189. [CrossRef]
Smith, C. I., Chang, D., and Tavoularis, S., 2010, “Effect of Inlet Temperature Non-Uniformity on High-Pressure Turbine Performance,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-22845. [CrossRef]
Qinjung, Z., Fei, T., Huishe, W., Jianyi, D., Xiaolu, Z., and Jianzhong, X., 2007, “Influence of Hot Streak Temperature Ratio on Low Pressure Stage of a Vaneless Counter-Rotating Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27028. [CrossRef]
Qingjun, Z., Jianyi, D., Huishe, W., Xiaolu, Z., and Jianzhong, X., 2008, “Tip Clearance Effects on Inlet Hot Streaks Migration Characteristics in High Pressure Stage of a Vaneless Counter-Rotating Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50582. [CrossRef]
Hills, N. J., 2007, “Whole Turbine CFD Modeling,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27918. [CrossRef]
Yao, J., Davis, R. L., Alonso, J. J., and Jameson, A., 2002, “Massively-Parallel Simulation of the Unsteady Flow in an Axial Turbine Stage,” J. Propul. Power, 18(2), pp. 465–471. [CrossRef]
Holmes, D. G., Moore, B. J., and Connell, S. D., 2011, “Unsteady vs. Steady Turbomachinery Flow Analysis: Exploiting Large-Scale Computations to Deepen Our Understanding of Turbomachinery Flows,” SciDAC Conference, Denver, CO, July 10–14.
Holmes, D. G., Mitchell, B. E., and Lorence, C. B., 1997, “Three-Dimensional Linearized Navier–Stokes Calculations for Flutter and Forced Response,” 8th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines, Stockholm, Sweden, September 14–18, pp. 211–224. [CrossRef]
Yao, J. and Carson, S., 2006, “HPT/LPT Interaction and Flow Management in the Inter-Turbine Space of a Modern Axial Flow Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-68506. [CrossRef]
Tallman, J. A., Haldeman, C. W., Dunn, M. G., Tolpadi, A. K., and Bergholz, R. F., 2009, “Heat Transfer Measurements and Predictions for a Modern, High-Pressure, Transonic Turbine, Including Endwalls,” ASME J. Turbomach., 131(2), p. 021001. [CrossRef]
Yao, J., Gorrell, S. E., and Wadia, A. R., 2010, “High-Fidelity Numerical Analysis of Per-Rev-Type Inlet Distortion Transfer in Multistage Fans—Part 1: Simulations With Selected Blade Rows,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132(4), p. 041014. [CrossRef]
Sharma, A., Richards, S. K., Wood, T. H., and Shieh, C. M., 2009, “Numerical Prediction of Exhaust Fan-Tone Noise From High Bypass Aircraft Engines,” AIAA J., 47(12), pp. 2866–2879. [CrossRef]
Hunter, S. D., 1998, “Source Term Mdoeling of Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Jameson, A., Schmidt, W., and Turkel, E., 1981, “Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge Kutta Time Stepping Schemes,” 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Palo Alto, CA, June 23–25, AIAA Paper No. 1981-1259. [CrossRef]
Jameson, A., 1991, “Time Dependent Calculations Using Multigrid With Applications to Unsteady Flows Pas Airfoils and Wings,” AIAA Paper No. 1991-1596. [CrossRef]
Wilcox, D. C., 1988, “Re-Assessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models,” AIAA J., 26(11), pp. 1299–1310. [CrossRef]
Huber, F. W., Johnson, P. D., Sharma, O. P., Staubach, J. B., and Gaddis, S. W., 1996, “Performance Improvement Through Indexing of Turbine Airfoils—Part 1: Experimental Investigation,” ASME J. Turbomach., 118(4), pp. 630–635. [CrossRef]
Chilla, M., Hodson, H., and Newman, D., 2012, “Unsteady Interaction Between Annulus and Turbine Rim Seal Flows,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69089. [CrossRef]
Kachel, C. E. and Denton, J. D., 2006, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Unsteady Surface Pressure in a Three-Stage Model of an Axial High-Pressure Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(2), pp. 261–272. [CrossRef]
Kopriva, J. E., Laskowski, G. M., and Shiekhi, R. H., 2013, “Assessment of High Pressure Cooled and Uncooled Turbine Blade Wakes Via RANS and URANS at Engine Scale Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94285. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational domain description (note: the geometry in this figure has been distorted from its true representation)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Spanwise profiles of absolute total temperature at the center-frame strut exit: steady and unsteady computations versus engine data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Instantaneous entropy solution at the midspan stream-tube: (a) 2nd stage nozzle staggered between 1st stage nozzle wakes, and (b) 2nd stage nozzle aligned with 1st stage nozzle wake (note: the geometry in this figure has been distorted from its true representation)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Time-averaged entropy contour predictions for select 2nd stage nozzle vanes: (left) 1st stage nozzle wake staggered versus the airfoil, and (right) aligned with the airfoil. (a) Staggered, and (b) aligned (note: the geometry in this figure has been distorted from its true representation).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Illustration of the convergence metrics for the unsteady CFD solution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Subperiod time-averaged solution Range for the absolute total temperature in the stationary frame of reference: (a) staggered, and (b) aligned

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Subperiod time-averaged solution Drift for the absolute total temperature in the stationary frame of reference: (a) staggered, and (b) aligned

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Time-averaged normalized absolute total temperature predictions in the stationary frame of reference: (a) staggered, and (b) aligned

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Passage-to-passage deviation of the time-averaged absolute total temperature: (a) staggered, and (b) aligned

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Magnitude of the discrete Fourier mode at the passing frequency of the first-stage rotor blade: (a) staggered, and (b) aligned

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Magnitude of the discrete Fourier mode at the passing frequency of the second-stage rotor blade: (a) staggered, and (b) aligned

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Normalized deterministic flux of total enthalpy in the radial direction: (a) staggered, and (b) aligned

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Normalized time-averaged diffusive (laminar and turbulent) energy transport in the radial direction: (a) staggered, and (b) aligned

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Difference in the time-averaged adiabatic wall temperatures between the staggered and aligned 2nd stage nozzle vane airfoils (note: the geometry in this figure has been distorted from its true representation)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Difference in the time-averaged adiabatic wall temperatures between the staggered and aligned 2nd stage rotor blade airfoils (note: the geometry in this figure has been distorted from its true representation)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In