0
Research Papers

Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Purge Flow on Film Cooling Effectiveness on a Rotating Turbine With Nonaxisymmetric End Wall Contouring

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Rezasoltani

Turbomachinery Performance
and Flow Research Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843-3123

M. T. Schobeiri

Turbomachinery Performance
and Flow Research Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843-3123
e-mail: tschobeiri@tamu.edu

J. C. Han

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843-3123

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received November 14, 2013; final manuscript received November 27, 2013; published online May 2, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 136(9), 091009 (May 02, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-13-1256; doi: 10.1115/1.4027196 History: Received November 14, 2013; Revised November 27, 2013

The impact of the purge flow injection on aerodynamics and film cooling effectiveness of a three-stage, high-pressure turbine with nonaxisymmetric end wall contouring has been experimentally investigated. As a continuation of the previously published work involving stator-rotor gap purge cooling, this study investigates film cooling effectiveness on the first-stage rotor contoured platform due to a coolant gas injection. Film cooling effectiveness measurements are performed on the rotor blade platform using a pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) technique. The present study examines, in particular, the film cooling effectiveness due to injection of coolant from the rotor cavity through the circumferential gap between the first stator followed by the first rotor. Effects of the presence of contouring, blowing ratios, rotational speeds, and coolant density ratio are studied and compared to a noncontouring platform. The experimental investigation is carried out in a three-stage turbine facility at the Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research Laboratory (TPFL) at Texas A&M University. Its rotor includes nonaxisymmetric end wall contouring on the first and second rotor row. The turbine has two independent cooling loops. Film cooling effectiveness measurements are performed for three coolant-to-mainstream mass flow ratios of 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%. Film cooling data is obtained for three rotational speeds, 3000 rpm (reference condition), 2550 rpm, and 2400 rpm, and compared with noncontoured end wall data. Effect of density ratio for coolant-to-mainstream density ratio (DR) = 1.0 and DR = 1.5 is also investigated. The comparisons of film effectiveness results show that contoured cases have a noticeable quantitative improvement compared to those of noncontoured ones.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Position of the circumferential gap for ejection of purge flow (left), contour geometry for first rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of contour depth along the suction surface to obtain the best end wall contouring efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Detailed view of the stator-rotor gap design for the rotating platform

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Section view of the modified stator-rotor turbine assembly for stator-rotor purge flow and platform film cooling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The overall layout of TPFL research turbine facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

PSP calibration curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Optical setup for PSP data acquisition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Pitchwise average film cooling effectiveness distribution along axial chord for different rpms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Film cooling effectiveness distribution on the contoured and noncontoured rotating platform for 2550 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Film cooling effectiveness distribution on the contoured and noncontoured rotating platform for 2400 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Velocity triangles and relative inlet and exit flow angles for design speed and off-design rotating speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Pitchwise average film cooling effectiveness distribution along axial chord for contoured platform for different MFRs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Total average film cooling effectiveness for different rpms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Film cooling effectiveness distribution on the contoured rotating platform for 3000 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of film cooling effectiveness distribution on the contoured and noncontoured rotating platform for 3000 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Film cooling effectiveness distribution at two different density ratios at 3000 rpm and MFR = 1%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Pitchwise average film cooling effectiveness distribution for two different coolants at 3000 rpm, MFR = 1%

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In