0
Research Papers

Experimental Comparison of Axial Turbine Performance Under Steady and Pulsating Flows

[+] Author and Article Information
A. St. George

Gas Dynamics and Propulsion Lab,
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: andrew.stgeorge@gmail.com

R. Driscoll

Gas Dynamics and Propulsion Lab,
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: r.b.driscoll.85@gmail.com

E. Gutmark

Gas Dynamics and Propulsion Lab,
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: ephraim.gutmark@uc.edu

D. Munday

Gas Dynamics and Propulsion Lab,
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: david.munday@uc.edu

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 7, 2014; final manuscript received July 21, 2014; published online August 26, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 136(11), 111005 (Aug 26, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1117; doi: 10.1115/1.4028115 History: Received July 07, 2014; Revised July 21, 2014

The performance of an axial turbine is studied under close-coupled, out-of-phase, multiple-admission pulsed air flow to approximate turbine behavior under pulsed detonation inflow. The operating range has been mapped for four frequencies and compared using multiple averaging approaches and five formulations of efficiency. Steady performance data for full and partial admission are presented as a basis for comparison to the pulsed flow cases. While time-averaged methods are found to be unsuitable, mass-averaged, work-averaged, and integrated instantaneous methods yield physically meaningful values and comparable trends for all frequencies. Peak work-averaged efficiency for pulsed flow cases is within 5% of the peak steady, full admission values for all frequencies, in contrast to the roughly 15–20% performance deficit experienced under steady, 50% partial admission conditions. Turbine efficiency is found to be a strong function of corrected flow rate and mass-averaged rotor incidence angle, but only weakly dependent on frequency.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Heiser, W. H., and Pratt, D. T., 2002, “Thermodynamic Cycle Analysis of Pulse Detonation Engines,” AIAA J. Propul. Power, 18(1), pp. 68–76. [CrossRef]
Rouser, K. P., 2012, “Unsteady Specific Work and Isentropic Efficiency of a Radial Turbine Driven by Pulsed Detonations,” Ph.D. dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.
Rasheed, A., Furman, A. H., and Dean, A. J., 2011, “Experimental Investigations of the Performance of a Multitube Pulse Detonation Turbine System,” AIAA J. Propul. Power, 27(3), pp. 586–596. [CrossRef]
Glaser, A. J., Caldwell, N., and Gutmark, E., 2006, “Performance Measurements of a Pulse Detonation Combustor Array Integrated With an Axial Flow Turbine,” 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 9–12, AIAA Paper No. 2006-1232. [CrossRef]
Caldwell, N., and Gutmark, E., 2008, “Experimental Analysis of a Hybrid Pulse Detonation Combustor/Gas Turbine Engine,” 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 7–10, AIAA Paper No. 2008-121. [CrossRef]
Fernelius, M. H., Gorrell, S. E., Hoke, J. L., and Schauer, F. R., 2013, “Design and Fabrication of an Experimental Test Facility to Compare the Performance of Pulsed and Steady Flow Through a Turbine,” 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exhibition, Grapevine, TX, January 7–10, AIAA Paper No. 2013-0277. [CrossRef]
Paxson, D. E., and Kaemming, T. A., 2012, “Foundational Performance Analyses of Pressure Gain Combustion Thermodynamic Benefits for Gas Turbines,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, TN, January 9–12, AIAA Paper No. 2012-0770. [CrossRef]
Van Zante, D., Envia, E., and Turner, M. G., 2007, “The Attenuation of a Detonation Wave by an Aircraft Engine Axial Turbine Stage,” 18th ISABE Conference, Beijing, September 2–7, Paper No. ISABE-2007-1260.
Suresh, A., Hofer, D. C., and Tangirala, V. E., 2012, “Turbine Efficiency for Unsteady, Periodic Flows,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(3), p. 034501. [CrossRef]
Karamanis, N., Martinez-Botas, R. F., and Su, C. C., 2001, “Mixed Flow Turbines: Inlet and Exit Flow Under Steady and Pulsating Conditions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123(2), pp. 359–371. [CrossRef]
Palfreyman, D., and Martinez-Botas, R. F., 2005, “The Pulsating Flow Field in a Mixed Flow Turbocharger Turbine: An Experimental and Computational Study,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127(1), pp. 144–155. [CrossRef]
Copeland, C. D., Martinez-Botas, R., and Seiler, M., 2011, “Comparison Between Steady and Unsteady Double-Entry Turbine Performance Using the Quasi-Steady Assumption,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(3), p. 031001. [CrossRef]
Benson, R. S., and Scrimshaw, K., 1965, “An Experimental Investigation of Non-Steady Flow in a Radial Gas Turbine,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 180(Pt. 3J), pp. 74–85. [CrossRef]
Costall, A., Szymko, S., Martinez-Botas, R. F., Filsinger, D., and Ninkovic, D., 2006, “Assessment of Unsteady Behavior in Turbocharger Turbines,” ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Barcelona, Spain, May 8–11, ASME Paper No. GT2006-90348. [CrossRef]
Wallace, F. J., Adgey, J. M., and Blair, G. P., 1969, “Performance of Inward Radial Flow Turbines Under Non-Steady Flow Conditions,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 184(1), pp. 183–196. [CrossRef]
Rajoo, S., and Martinez-Botas, R. F., 2010, “Unsteady Effect in a Nozzled Turbocharger Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132(3), p. 031001. [CrossRef]
Craig, H. R. M., Edwards, K. J., Horlock, J. H., Janota, M., Shaw, R., and Woods, W. A., 1968, “An Investigation of Steady and Unsteady Flow Through a Napier Turboblower Turbine Under Conditions of Full and Partial Admission,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 183(1), pp. 615–630. [CrossRef]
Daneshyar, H., Edwards, K. J., Horlock, J. H., Janota, M. S., Pearson, R. D., and Shaw, R., 1969, “A Comparison of the Performance of Three Model Axial Flow Turbines Tested Under Both Steady and Pulse Flow Conditions,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 184(1), pp. 1119–1134. [CrossRef]
Ni, R., Humber, W., Ni, M., Sondergaard, R., and Ooten, M., 2013, “Performance Estimation of a Turbine Under Partial-Admission and Flow Pulsation Conditions at Inlet,” ASME Turbo Expo 2013, San Antonio, TX, June 3–7, ASME Paper No. GT2013-94811. [CrossRef]
Marelli, S., and Capobianco, M., 2011, “Steady and Pulsating Flow Efficiency of a Waste-Gated Turbocharger Radial Flow Turbine for Automotive Application,” Energy, 36(1), pp. 459–465. [CrossRef]
Hellström, F., 2008, “Numerical Computations of the Unsteady Flow in a Radial Turbine,” Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH Mechanics, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fernelius, M., Gorrell, S., Hoke, J., and Schauer, F., 2013, “Effect of Periodic Pressure Pulses on Axial Turbine Performance,” 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion, San Jose, CA, July 14–17, AIAA Paper No. 2013-3687. [CrossRef]
Chen, H., Hakeem, I., and Martinez-Botas, R. F., 1996, “Modelling of a Turbocharger Turbine Under Pulsating Inlet Conditions,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 210(5), pp. 397–408. [CrossRef]
Munday, D., St. George, A. C., Driscoll, R., Stoddard, W., Romanchuk, B., and Gutmark, E., 2013, “The Design and Validation of a Pulse Detonation Engine Facility With and Without Axial Turbine Integration,” 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine, TX, January 7–10, AIAA Paper No. 2013-0275. [CrossRef]
Brandner, P. A., Clarke, D. B., and Walker, G. J., 2004, “Development of a Fast Response Pressure Probe for Use in a Cavitation Tunnel,” 15th Australasian Maritime Fluid Mechanics Conference, Sydney, Australia, December 13–17.
Tellefsen, J., King, P., Schauer, F., and Hoke, J., 2012, “Analysis of an RDE With Convergent Nozzle in Preparation for Turbine Integration,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, TN, January 9–12, AIAA Paper No. 2012-0773. [CrossRef]
Kar, K., Roberts, S., Stone, R., Oldfield, M., and French, B., 2004, “Instantaneous Exhaust Temperature Measurements Using Thermocouple Compensation Techniques,” SAE 2004 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, March 8–11, SAE Paper No. 2004-01-1418. [CrossRef]
Kar, K., Swain, A. K., and Raine, R., 2009, “Identification of Time-Varying Time Constants of Thermocouple Sensors and Its Application to Temperature Measurement,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 131(1), p. 011005. [CrossRef]
Cumpsty, N. A., and Horlock, J. H., 2006, “Averaging Non-Uniform Flow for a Purpose,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(1), pp. 120–129. [CrossRef]
Pianko, M., and Wazelt, F., 1982, “Propulsion and Energetics Panel Working Group 14 on Suitable Averaging Techniques in Non-Uniform Internal Flows,” Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD), Neuilly Sur Seine, France, Advisory Report No. 182.
Moffat, R., 1988, “Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 1(1), pp. 3–17. [CrossRef]
Benson, R. S., and Woods, W. A., 1960, “Wave Action in the Exhaust System of a Supercharged Two-Stroke Engine Model,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1(2–3), pp. 253–281. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of Garrett JFS-100-13A power generation turbine unit (from Garrett User Manual)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Overview of the integrated turbine rig in the UC PDE test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sector layout (facing the turbine inlet) with notional pulse progression for the system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of traversable, high speed pitot probe with embedded transducer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic of turbine geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Steady, full and 50% partial admission performance maps for (a) MFP and (b) efficiency, for N′/N′DES characteristics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Total pressure evolution at the turbine inlet plane at 10 Hz for (a) 0.40 kg/s, (b) 0.60 kg/s, and (c) 0.78 kg/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pulse shape sensitivity to frequency for 0.78 kg/s and 0.40 kg/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Evolution of swirl at the turbine (a) inlet and (b) exit at 10 Hz, 0.60 kg/s for varying pitot probe rotational angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of pressure ratio formulations relative to work-averaged definition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Corrected mass flow (via work-averaging) versus pressure ratio for all pulsation frequencies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Flow rate evolution for a turbine inlet sector at 20 Hz, for maximum turbine loading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of efficiency calculation methods for 10 Hz, 53% design corrected speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

(a) Incidence evolution over pulse cycle (b) effect of mass-averaged rotor incidence on cycle efficiency for 10 Hz pulsations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Work-averaged efficiency performance maps: (a) 5 Hz, (b) 10 Hz, (c) 15 Hz, and (d) 20 Hz

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In