0
Research Papers

Influence of Unsteadiness on the Control of a Hub-Corner Separation Within a Radial Vaned Diffuser

[+] Author and Article Information
Aurélien Marsan

Département de Génie Mécanique,
Université de Sherbrooke,
Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
e-mail: aurelien.marsan@usherbrooke.ca

Isabelle Trébinjac

Laboratoire de Mécanique des,
Fluides et d'Acoustique,
UMR CNRS 5509,
École Centrale de lyon,
Ecully Cedex 69134, France

Sylvain Coste, Gilles Leroy

Turbomeca,
Safran Group,
Bordes 64511, France

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 8, 2014; final manuscript received July 28, 2014; published online September 30, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 137(2), 021008 (Sep 30, 2014) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1125; doi: 10.1115/1.4028244 History: Received July 08, 2014; Revised July 28, 2014

The present work aims at evaluating the effect of the impeller–diffuser interaction on the control of a hub corner separation, which develops in the radial vaned diffuser of a centrifugal compressor designed and built by Turbomeca, Safran group. Unsteady numerical simulations of the flow in the aspirated centrifugal compressor are then performed. Numerical results are validated by comparison with the available experimental results. The analysis of the numerical flow field shows that the hub-corner separation is not completely removed by the suction, on the contrary to the steady-state results that were obtained in previous work. The boundary layer separation is only translated downstream. Its location is explained by the scrolling of the pressure waves generated by the impeller–diffuser interaction, which strengthen when crossing the diffuser throat. This result highlights the major role played by the impeller–diffuser interaction, which should be taken into account for developing control strategies in radial vaned diffusers, and stresses the shortcoming of the steady-state numerical model when suction is applied.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Peacock, R. E., 1965, “Boundary-Layer Suction to Eliminate Corner Separation in Cascades of Airfoils,” University of Cambridge Reports and Memoranda No. 3663, Cambridge, UK.
Miller, M. L., and Chapman, D. C., 1968, “Single-Stage Experimental Evaluation of Boundary Layer Bleed Techniques for High Lift Stator Blades,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Contract No. NAS3-7900 CR-54569.
Reijnen, D. P., 1997, “Experimental Study of Boundary Layer Suction in a Transonic Compressor,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Merchant, A., Kerrebrock, J. L., Adamczyk, J. J., and Braunscheidel, E., 2005, “Experimental Investigation of a High Pressure Ratio Aspirated Fan Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127(1), pp. 43–51. [CrossRef]
Kerrebrock, J., Epstein, A., Merchant, A., Guenette, G., Parker, D., Onnee, J.-F., Neumayer, F., Adamczyk, J., and Shabbir, A., 2008, “Design and Test of an Aspirated Counter-Rotating Fan,” ASME J. Turbomach., 130(2), p. 021004. [CrossRef]
Godard, A., 2010, “Etude numerique et experimentale d'un compresseur aspire,” Ph.D. thesis, École Centrale de Lyon, LMFA, Écully, France.
Marsan, A., Trébinjac, I., Coste, S., and Leroy, G., 2012, “Numerical Investigation of the Flow in a Radial Vaned Diffuser Without and With Aspiration,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68610. [CrossRef]
Marsan, A., Trébinjac, I., Coste, S., and Leroy, G., 2012, “Study and Control of a Radial Vaned Diffuser Stall,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 2012, p. 549048. [CrossRef]
Marsan, A., Trébinjac, I., Coste, S., and Leroy, G., 2013, “Temporal Behavior of a Boundary Layer Separation Within a Radial Vaned Diffuser,” 10th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics (ETC10), Lappeenranta, Finland, Apr. 15–19, Paper No. A156.
Marsan, A., Trébinjac, I., Coste, S., and Leroy, G., 2013, “Temporal Behaviour of a Corner Separation in a Radial Vaned Diffuser of a Centrifugal Compressor Operating Near Surge,” J. Therm. Sci., 22(6), pp. 555–564. [CrossRef]
Haller, G., 2004, “Exact Theory of Unsteady Separation for Two-Dimensional Flows,” J. Fluid Mech., 512, pp. 257–311. [CrossRef]
Domercq, O., 1998, “Analyse expérimentale et modélisation des interactions rotor-stator dans les compresseurs centrifuges,” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace, Toulouse, France.
Cambier, L., and Gazaix, M., 2002, “elsA: An Efficient Object-Oriented Solution to CFD Complexity,” 40th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV, Jan. 14–17, AIAA Paper No. 2002-0108, pp. 14–17 [CrossRef].
Cambier, L., and Veuillot, J., 2008, “Status of the elsA CFD Software for Flow Simulation and Multidisciplinary Applications,” 46th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, Jan. 7–10, AIAA Paper No. 2008-664. [CrossRef]
Bulot, N., 2010, “Analyse expérimentale et modélisation numérique des mécanismes d'interactions instationnaires à proximité du pompage d'un étage de compresseur centrifuge à fort taux de compression,” Ph.D. thesis, École Centrale de Lyon, LMFA, Écully, France.
Dano, C., 2003, “Évaluation de modèles de turbulence pour la simulation d’écoulements tridimensionnels instationnaires en turbomachines,” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, LMFA, Écully, France.
Hill, R., 2007, “Simulation of Spike Stall Inception in a Radial Vanted Diffuser,” Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Pierpont, P., 1956, “Investigation of Suction Slot Shapes for Controlling a Turbulent Boundary Layer,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, NASA Research Memorandum, Technical Report No. NACA-RM-L6H20.
Surana, A., Jacobs, G., Grunberg, O., and Haller, G., 2008, “An Exact Theory of Three-Dimensional Fixed Separation in Unsteady Flows,” Phys. Fluids, 20(10), p. 107101. [CrossRef]
Cabral, B., and Leedom, L. C., 1993, “Imaging Vector Fields Using Line Integral Convolution,” 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’93), Anaheim, CA, Aug. 1–6, pp. 263–270 [CrossRef].
Sundquist, A., 2001, “Dynamic Line Integral Convolution for Visualizing Electromagnetic Phenomena,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Laramee, R. S., Jobard, B., and Hauser, H., 2003, “Image Space Based Visualization of Unsteady Flow on Surfaces,” 14th IEEE Visualization 2003 (VIS'03), Seattle, WA, Oct. 19–24, pp. 131–138 [CrossRef].
Greitzer, E. M., 1981, “The Stability of Pumping Systems—The 1980 Freeman Scholar Lecture,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 103(2), pp. 193–242. [CrossRef]
Cumpsty, N., 2004, Compressor Aerodynamics, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL.
Filipenco, V., Deniz, S., Johnston, J., and Greitzer, E., 2000, “Effects of Inlet Flow Field Conditions on the Performance of Centrifugal Compressor Diffusers: Part 1—Discrete-Passage Diffuser,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122(1), pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Everitt, J., 2010, “An Investigation of Stall Inception in Centrifugal Compressor Vaned Diffusers,” Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Hunziker, R., and Gyarmathy, G., 1994, “The Operational Stability of a Centrifugal Compressor and Its Dependence on the Characteristics of the Subcomponents,” ASME J. Turbomach., 116(2), pp. 250–259. [CrossRef]
Bulot, N., and Trébinjac, I., 2009, “Effect of the Unsteadiness on the Diffuser Flow in a Transonic Centrifugal Compressor Stage,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 2009, p. 932593. [CrossRef]
Everitt, J., and Spakovszky, Z., 2011, “An Investigation of Stall Inception in Centrifugal Compressor Vaned Diffusers,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46332. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Total-to-static pressure ratio. Steady-state numerical results. Without (circles) and with (triangles) suction [8].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Performance of the diffuser—experimental/numerical—no suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Unsteady pressure signals in the diffuser—shroud wall. Numerical versus experimental [9].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

View of the low-momentum flow zone. Isosurface at Mach number = 0.1 [10].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Topology of the separation. URANS—time-averaged [10].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Location of the suction slot

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Diffuser static pressure recovery coefficient: without/with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Diffuser total pressure losses coefficient: without/with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Steady-state skin-friction patterns: without and with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Three-dimensional streamlines—RANS calculations—with suction (view from downstream)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Blockage in the diffuser, near hub, and shroud

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Global blockage ratio: without and with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Static pressure recovery coefficient of the subcomponents of the diffuser

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Instantaneous skin-friction pattern: with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison between streamlines of the time-averaged flow field and trajectories

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Time-averaged skin-friction patterns: without and with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Maxima of the steady-state (up), time-averaged (middle), and instantaneous (down) adverse pressure gradient—10% of vein height—with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Propagation of a high pressure waves in the diffuser

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Characteristic curves of the diffuser subcomponents—URANS, without and with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Blockage in the diffuser—URANS, without and with suction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Three-slots suction strategy—URANS, without suction

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In