Research Papers

Quantitative Computational Fluid Dynamics Analyses of Particle Deposition on a Transonic Axial Compressor Blade—Part I: Particle Zones Impact

[+] Author and Article Information
Alessio Suman, Nicola Aldi, Michele Pinelli, Pier Ruggero Spina

Dipartimento di Ingegneria,
Università degli Studi di Ferrara,
Ferrara 44122, Italy

Rainer Kurz

Solar Turbines Incorporated,
San Diego, CA 92123

Mirko Morini

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale,
Università degli Studi di Parma,
Parma 43121, Italy

Klaus Brun

Southwest Research Institute,
San Antonio, TX 78228

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 21, 2014; final manuscript received August 4, 2014; published online September 30, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 137(2), 021009 (Sep 30, 2014) (14 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1159; doi: 10.1115/1.4028295 History: Received July 21, 2014; Revised August 04, 2014

Solid particle ingestion is one of the principal degradation mechanisms in the turbine and compressor sections of gas turbines. In particular, in industrial applications, the microparticles that are not captured by the air filtration system cause fouling and, consequently, a performance drop of the compressor. This paper presents three-dimensional numerical simulations of the microparticle ingestion (0 μm–2 μm) on an axial compressor rotor carried out by means of a commercial computational fluid dynamic (CFD) code. Particles of this size can follow the main air flow with relatively little slip, while being impacted by flow turbulence. It is of great interest to the industry to determine which areas of the compressor airfoils are impacted by these small particles. Particle trajectory simulations use a stochastic Lagrangian tracking method that solves the equations of motion separate from the continuous phase. Then, the NASA Rotor 37 is considered as a case study for the numerical investigation. The compressor rotor numerical model and the discrete phase treatment have been validated against the experimental and numerical data available in literature. The number of particles, sizes, and concentrations are specified in order to perform a quantitative analysis of the particle impact on the blade surface. The results show that microparticles tend to follow the flow by impacting at full span with a higher impact concentration on the pressure side (PS). The suction side (SS) is affected only by the impact of the smaller particles (up to 1 μm). Particular fluid dynamic phenomena, such as separation, stagnation point, and tip leakage vortex, strongly influence the impact location of the particles.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


camfil FARR, 2013, “Offshore-Filtration and Acoustic Package,” Solar Turbine Inc., San Diego CA, confidential report.
Wilcox, M., Kurz, R., and Brun, K., 2011, “Successful Selection and Operation of Gas Turbine Inlet Filtration Systems,” Proceedings of the 40th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, Sept. 12–15, pp. 254–268.
Kurz, R., and Brun, K., 2012, “Fouling Mechanism in Axial Compressors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(3), p. 032401. [CrossRef]
Morini, M., Pinelli, M., Spina, P. R., and Venturini, M., 2011, “Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Uniform Surface Roughness on Compressor Stage Performance,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(7), p. 072402. [CrossRef]
Aldi, N., Morini, M., Pinelli, M., Spina, P. R., Suman, A., and Venturini, M., 2014, “Performance Evaluation of Non-Uniformly Fouled Axial Compressor Stages by Means of Computational Fluid Dynamics Analyses,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(2), p. 021016. [CrossRef]
Kurz, R., Brun, K., Meher-Homji, C., and Moore, J., 2012, “Gas Turbine Performance and Maintenance,” 41st Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, Sept. 24–27.
Fluent, 2005, Software Training, TRN-98-006, Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH.
Zhang, Z., and Chen, Q., 2006, “Experimental Measurements and Numerical Simulations of Particle Transport and Distribution in Ventilated Rooms,” Atmos. Environ., 40(18), pp. 3396–3408. [CrossRef]
Gupta, P. K., and Pagalthivarthi, K. V., 2006, “A Comparative Study of Effect of Model Lift Coefficients on Particle Trajectory,” Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci., 13(4), pp. 293–306
Goodwin, J. E., Sage, W., and Tilly, G. P., 1969, “Study of Erosion by Solid Particles,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 184(15), pp. 279–292. [CrossRef]
Hamed, A., Tabakoff, W., and Wenglarz, R., 2006, “Erosion and Deposition in Turbomachinery,” J. Propul. Power, 22(2), pp. 350–360. [CrossRef]
Hamed, A. A., Tabakoff, W., Rivir, R. B., Das, K., and Arora, P., 2005, “Turbine Blade Surface Deterioration by Erosion,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127(3), pp. 445–452. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, M., Inaba, K., and Yamamoto, M., 2008, “Numerical Simulation of Sand Erosion Phenomena in Rotor/Stator Interaction of Compressor,” J. Thermal Sci., 17(2), pp. 125–133. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, M., and Yamamoto, M., 2011, “Numerical Simulation of Sand Erosion Phenomena in a Single-Stage Axial Compressor,” J. Fluid Sci. Technol., 6(1), pp. 98–113. [CrossRef]
Ghenaiet, A., 2012, “Study of Sand Particle Trajectories and Erosion Into the First Compression Stage of a Turbofan,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(5), p. 051025. [CrossRef]
Vigueras Zuniga, M. O., 2007, “Analysis of Gas Turbine Compressor Fouling and Washing on Line,” Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.
Parker, G. J., and Lee, P., 1972, “Studies of the Deposition of Sub-Micron Particles on Turbine Blades,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 186(1), pp. 519–526. [CrossRef]
Elrod, C. E., and Bettner, J. L., 1983, “Experimental Verification of an Endwall Boundary Layer Prediction Method,” NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace and Development, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, Report No. AGARD CP-351.
Morini, M., Pinelli, M., Spina, P. R., and Venturini, M., 2010, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Fouling on Axial Compressor Stages,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(7), p. 072401. [CrossRef]
Reid, L., and Moore, R. D., 1978, “Design and Overall Performance of Four Highly-Loaded, High-Speed Inlet Stages for an Advanced High-Pressure-Ratio Core Compressor,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, NASA Report No. TP 1337.
ANSYS, 2012, AnsysFluent User Manual, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Morsi, S. A., and Alexander, A. J., 1972, “An Investigation of Particle Trajectories in Two-Phase Flow Systems,” J. Fluid Mech., 55(2), pp. 193–208. [CrossRef]
Clift, R., Grace, J. R., and Weber, M. E., 1978, Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, Academic Press, New York.
Wang, T., and Dhanasekaran, T. S., 2008, “Calibration of CFD Model for Mist/Steam Impinging Jets Cooling,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50737. [CrossRef]
Tomas, J., 2006, “Mechanics of Particle Adhesion,” Particles on Surfaces 8: Detection, Adhesion and Removal (extended master version), VSP Utrecht. Utrecht, Netherlands, pp. 183–229.
Meher-Homji, C. B., Chaker, M., and Bromley, A. F., 2009, “The Fouling of Axial Flow Compressor—Causes, Effects, Susceptibility, and Sensitivity,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59239. [CrossRef]
Ahlert, K., 1994, “Effects of Particle Impingiment Angle and Surface Wetting on Solid Particle Erosion of AISI 1018 Steel,” M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.
Forder, A., Thew, M., and Harrison, D., 1998, “A Numerical Investigation of Solid Particle Erosion Experienced Within Oilfield Control Valves,” Wear, 216(2), pp. 184–193. [CrossRef]
Tian, T., and Ahmadi, G., 2006, “Particle Deposition in Turbulent Duct Flows—Comparisons of Different Model Predictions,” J. Aerosol Sci., 38(4), pp. 377–397. [CrossRef]
Suman, A., Morini, M., Kurz, R., Aldi, N., Brun, K., Pinelli, M., and Spina, P. R., 2014, “Quantitative Computational Fluid Dynamics Analyses of Particle Deposition on a Transonic Axial Compressor Blade—Part II: Impact Kinematics and Particle Sticking Analysis,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(2), p. 021010. [CrossRef]
Silingardi, A., Astrua, P., Piola, S., and Ventrucci, I., 2013, “A Method for a Reliable Prediction of Heavy Duty Gas Turbines Performance Degradation Due to Compressor Aging Employing Field Test Data,” Power Gen Europe, Messe, Wien, Austria, June 4–6.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Combination of filtration mechanism to obtain filter efficiency at various particle sizes [2]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison between the experimental results (Exp.) [20] and the CFD results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

NASA Rotor 37 numerical domain: (a) single passage vane, (b) the mesh on the blade surface, and (c) the mesh at the inlet surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Capture efficiency ηhit and Stokes number St versus particle diameter dp

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

DPM concentrations (kg/m3), PS and SS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Particle distributions ΧSLICE, 2nd, 6th, and 10th strip, case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Average DPM concentration and total mass flow mp versus particle diameter dp

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Spanwise subdivision (left side) and overall impact patterns

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Impact strip concentrations ΧSTRIP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Shear stress and deposition contour plots ΧSLICE,SS with the separation line superimposed, case 1





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In