0
Research Papers

Quantitative Computational Fluid Dynamic Analyses of Particle Deposition on a Transonic Axial Compressor Blade—Part II: Impact Kinematics and Particle Sticking Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Alessio Suman, Nicola Aldi, Michele Pinelli, Pier Ruggero Spina

Dipartimento di Ingegneria,
Università degli Studi di Ferrara,
Ferrara 44122, Italy

Mirko Morini

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale,
Università degli Studi di Parma,
Parma 43121, Italy

Rainer Kurz

Solar Turbines Incorporated,
San Diego, CA 92123

Klaus Brun

Southwest Research Institute,
San Antonio, TX 78228

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 21, 2014; final manuscript received August 4, 2014; published online September 30, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 137(2), 021010 (Sep 30, 2014) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1160; doi: 10.1115/1.4028296 History: Received July 21, 2014; Revised August 04, 2014

In heavy-duty gas turbines, the microparticles that are not captured by the air filtration system can cause fouling and, consequently, a performance drop of the compressor. This paper presents three-dimensional numerical simulations of the microparticle ingestion (0 μm–2 μm) on an axial compressor rotor carried out by means of a commercial computational fluid dynamic (CFD) code. Particle trajectory simulations use a stochastic Lagrangian tracking method that solves the equations of motion separately from the continuous phase. The NASA Rotor 37 is considered as a case study for the numerical investigation. The compressor rotor numerical model and the discrete phase model were previously validated by the authors in the first part of this work. The kinematic characteristics (velocity and angle) of the impact of micrometric and submicrometric particles with the blade surface of an axial transonic compressor are shown. The blade zones affected by particle impact were extensively analyzed and reported in the first part of this work, forming the starting point for the analyses shown in this paper. The kinematic analysis showed a high tendency of particle adhesion on the suction side (SS), especially for the particles with a diameter equal to 0.25 μm. Fluid dynamic phenomena and airfoil shape play a key role regarding particle impact velocity and angle. This work has the goal of combining, for the first time, the kinematic characteristics of particle impact on the blade with fouling phenomenon by the use of a quantity called sticking probability (SP) adopted from literature. From these analyses, some guidelines for a proper management of the power plant (in terms of filtration and washing strategies) are highlighted.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

camfil FARR, 2013, “Offshore-Filtration and Acoustic Package,” Solar Turbine Inc., San Diego CA, confidential report.
Kurz, R., Brun, K., Meher-Homji, C., and Moore, J., 2012, “Gas Turbine Performance and Maintenance,” 41st Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, Sept. 24–27.
Jin, H., He, C., Lu, L., and Fan, J., 2013, “Numerical Investigation of the Wall Effect on Airborne Particle Dispersion in a Test Chamber,” Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 13, pp. 786–794. [CrossRef]
Wilcox, M., Kurz, R., and Brun, K., 2011, “Successful Selection and Operation of Gas Turbine Inlet Filtration Systems,” 40th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, Sept. 12–15, pp. 254–268.
Heim, L. O., Blum, J., Preuss, M., and Butt, H. J., 1999, “Adhesion and Friction Forces Between Spherical Micrometer-Sized Particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 83(16), pp. 3328–3331. [CrossRef]
Suman, A., Kurz, R., Aldi, N., Morini, M., Brun, K., Pinelli, M., and Spina, P. R., 2014, “Quantitative Computational Fluid Dynamics Analyses of Particle Deposition on a Transonic Axial Compressor Blade—Part I: Particle Zones Impact,” ASME J. Turbomach.137(2), p. 021009. [CrossRef]
Hertz, H., 1882, “Miscellaneous Papers,” Macmillan and Co., Ltd., London, (authorised English translation), pp. 146–183.
Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K., and Roberts, A. D., 1971, “Surface Energy and the Contact of Elastic Solids,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 324(1558), pp. 301–313. [CrossRef]
Thornton, C., and Ning, Z., 1998, “A Theoretical Model for the Stick/Bounce Behavior of Adhesive Elastic-Plastic Spheres,” Powder Technol., 99(2), pp. 154–162. [CrossRef]
Wall, S., John, W., Wang, H. C., and Goren, S. L., 1990, “Measurements of Kinetic Energy Loss for Particles Impacting Surfaces,” Aerosol Sci. Technol., 12(4), pp. 926–946. [CrossRef]
Poppe, T., Blum, J., and Henning, T., 2000, “Analogous Experiments on the Stickiness of Micron-Sized Preplanetary Dust,” Astrophys. J., 533(1), pp. 454–471. [CrossRef]
Poppe, T., and Blum, J., 1997, “Experimental on Pre-Planetary Grain Growth,” Adv. Space Res., 20(8), pp. 1595–1604. [CrossRef]
Hamed, A., Tabakoff, W., and Wenglarz, R., 2006, “Erosion and Deposition in Turbomachinery,” J. Propul. Power, 22(2), pp. 350–360. [CrossRef]
Hamed, A. A., Tabakoff, W., Rivir, R. B., Das, K., and Arora, P., 2005, “Turbine Blade Surface Deterioration by Erosion,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127(3), pp. 445–452. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, M., Inaba, K., and Yamamoto, M., 2008, “Numerical Simulation of Sand Erosion Phenomena in Rotor/Stator Interaction of Compressor,” J. Therm. Sci., 17(2), pp. 125–133. [CrossRef]
Ghenaiet, A., 2012, “Study of Sand Particle Trajectories and Erosion Into the First Compression Stage of a Turbofan,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(5), p. 051025. [CrossRef]
Reid, L., and Moore, R. D., 1978, “Design and Overall Performance of Four Highly-Loaded, High-Speed Inlet Stages for an Advanced High-Pressure-Ratio Core Compressor,” NASA TP 1337.
ANSYS, 2012, Ansys Fluent User Manual, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Ahlert, K., 1994, “Effects of Particle Impingement Angle and Surface Wetting on Solid Particle Erosion of AISI 1018 Steel,” M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.
Forder, A., Thew, M., and Harrison, D., 1998, “A Numerical Investigation of Solid Particle Erosion Experienced Within Oilfield Control Valves,” Wear, 216(2), pp. 184–193. [CrossRef]
Kurz, R., and Brun, K., 2012, “Fouling Mechanism in Axial Compressors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(3), p. 032401. [CrossRef]
Mangwandia, C., Cheonga, Y. S., Adamsb, M. J., Hounslowa, M. J., and Salmana, A. D., 2007, “The Coefficient of Restitution of Different Representative Types of Granules,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(1–2), pp. 437–450. [CrossRef]
Adi, S., Adi, H., Chan, H.-K., Tong, Z., Yang, R., and Yu, A., 2013, “Effects of Mechanical Impaction on Aerosol Performance of Particles With Different Surface Roughness,” Powder Technol., 236, pp. 164–170. [CrossRef]
Silingardi, A., Astrua, P., Piola, S., and Ventrucci, I., 2013, “A Method for a Reliable Prediction of Heavy Duty Gas Turbines Performance Degradation Due to Compressor Aging Employing Field Test Data,” Power Gen Europe, Messe, Wien, Austria, June 4–6.
Morini, M., Pinelli, M., Spina, P. R., and Venturini, M., 2011, “Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Non-Uniform Surface Roughness on Compressor Stage Performance,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(7), p. 072402. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Impact velocity vi, 2nd, 6th, 10th strip, case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Impact velocity vi, 11th strip SS, case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Particle vectors velocity: (a) normal and tangential impact velocity and (b) impact velocity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Impact angle α, 6th strip, PS, case 1 and (b) contour plot of the PS curvature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Impact angle α, 10th strip, SS, case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

SP versus normal impact velocity vn of silicon carbide particles, 0.37 μm on silica target [11], and trend of adopted equations superimposed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

SP versus normal impact velocity vn of silicon carbide particles, 0.64 μm on silica target [11], and trend of adopted equations superimposed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

SP, 6th strip, case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Tangential velocity vt, 6th strip, case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Ratio nSIDE for the SS and PS of cases 1, 2, and 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Trends of the ratio nhit,SP>0.5 and ηhit superimposed

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In