Research Papers

Blade Tip Carving Effects on the Aerothermal Performance of a Transonic Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
C. De Maesschalck

Turbomachinery and Propulsion Department,
von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,
Rhode Saint Genèse,
Brussels BE-1640, Belgium
e-mail: demaess@vki.ac.be

S. Lavagnoli

Turbomachinery and Propulsion Department,
von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,
Rhode Saint Genèse,
Brussels BE-1640, Belgium
e-mail: lavagnoli@vki.ac.be

G. Paniagua

Turbomachinery and Propulsion Department,
von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,
Rhode Saint Genèse,
Brussels BE-1640, Belgium
e-mail: paniagua@vki.ac.be

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received January 23, 2014; final manuscript received July 28, 2014; published online September 16, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Cengiz Camci.

J. Turbomach 137(2), 021005 (Sep 16, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1010; doi: 10.1115/1.4028326 History: Received January 23, 2014; Revised July 28, 2014

Tip leakage flows in unshrouded high speed turbines cause large aerodynamic penalties, induce significant thermal loads and give rise to intense thermal stresses onto the blade tip and casing endwalls. In the pursuit of superior engine reliability and efficiency, the turbine blade tip design is of paramount importance and still poses an exceptional challenge to turbine designers. The ever-increasing rotational speeds and pressure loadings tend to accelerate the tip flow velocities beyond the transonic regime. Overtip supersonic flows are characterized by complex flow patterns, which determine the heat transfer signature. Hence, the physics of the overtip flow structures and the influence of the geometrical parameters require further understanding to develop innovative tip designs. Conventional blade tip shapes are not adequate for such high speed flows and hence, potential for enhanced performances lays in appropriate tip shaping. The present research aims to quantify the prospective gain offered by a fully contoured blade tip shape against conventional geometries such as a flat and squealer tip. A detailed numerical study was conducted on a modern rotor blade (Reynolds number of 5.5 × 105 and a relative exit Mach number of 0.9) by means of three-dimensional (3D) Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) calculations. Two novel contoured tip geometries were designed based on a two-dimensional (2D) tip shape optimization in which only the upper 2% of the blade span was modified. This study yields a deeper insight into the application of blade tip carving in high speed turbines and provides guidelines for future tip designs with enhanced aerothermal performances.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bunker, R. S., 2006, “Axial Turbine Blade Tips: Function, Design, and Durability,” J. Propul. Power, 22(2), pp. 271–285. [CrossRef]
Yoon, S., Curtis, E., Denton, J., and Longley, J., 2010, “The Effect of Clearance on Shrouded and Unshrouded Turbines at Two Levels of Reaction,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-22541. [CrossRef]
Harvey, N. W., 2004, “Aerothermal Implications of Shroudless and Shrouded Blades,” Turbine Blade Tip Design and Tip Clearance Treatment (von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series), T.Arts, ed., von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode Saint Genese, Belgium.
Montomoli, F., Massini, M., and Salvadori, S., 2011, “Uncertainty in Turbomachinery: Tip Gap and Fillet Radius,” J. Comput. Fluids, 46(1), pp. 362–368. [CrossRef]
Moore, J., and Tilton, J. S., 1988, “Tip Leakage Flow in a Linear Turbine Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 110(1), pp. 18–26. [CrossRef]
Heyes, F. J. G., Hodson, H. P., and Dailey, G. M., 1992, “The Effect of Blade Tip Geometry on the Tip Leakage Flow in Axial Turbine Cascades,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114(3), pp. 643–651. [CrossRef]
Newton, P. J., Lock, G. D., Krishnababu, S. K., Hodson, H. P., Dawes, W. N., Hannis, J., and Whitney, C., 2006, “Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics of Turbine Blade Tips in a Linear Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(2), pp. 300–309. [CrossRef]
Bunker, R. S., 2001, “A Review of Turbine Blade Tip Heat Transfer in Gas Turbine Systems,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 934, pp. 64–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mischo, B., Behr, T., and Abhari, R. S., 2008, “Flow Physics and Profiling of Recessed Blade Tips: Impact on Performance and Heat Load,” ASME J. Turbomach., 130(2), p. 021008. [CrossRef]
Camci, C., Dey, D., and Kavurmacioglu, L., 2005, “Aerodynamics of Tip Leakage Flows Near Partial Squealer Rims in an Axial Flow Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127(1), pp. 14–24. [CrossRef]
Nasir, H., Ekkad, S. V., Kontrovitz, D. M., Bunker, R. S., and Prakash, C., 2004, “Effect of Tip Gap and Squealer Geometry on Detailed Heat Transfer Measurements Over a High Pressure Turbine Rotor Blade Tip,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(2), pp. 221–228. [CrossRef]
Saxena, V., Nasir, H., and Ekkad, S. V., 2004, “Effect of Blade Tip Geometry on Tip Flow and Heat Transfer for a Blade in a Low-Speed Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(1), pp. 130–138. [CrossRef]
Key, N. L., and Arts, T., 2006, “Comparison of Turbine Tip Leakage Flow for Flat Tip and Squealer Tip Geometries at High-Speed Conditions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(2), pp. 213–220. [CrossRef]
Kwak, J. S., Ahn, J., Han, J., Pang Lee, C., Bunker, R. S., Boyle, R., and Gaugler, R., 2003, “Heat Transfer Coefficients on the Squealer Tip and Near-Tip Regions of a Gas Turbine Blade With Single or Double Squealer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(4), pp. 778–787. [CrossRef]
Krishnababu, S. K., Newton, P. J., Dawes, W. N., Lock, G. D., Hodson, H. P., Hannis, J., and Whitney, C., 2009, “Aerothermal Investigations of Tip Leakage Flow in Axial Flow Turbines—Part I: Effect of Tip Geometry and Tip Clearance Gap,” ASME J. Turbomach., 131(1), p. 011006. [CrossRef]
Dey, D., and Camci, C., 2001, “Aerodynamic Tip Desensitization of an Axial Turbine Rotor Using Tip Platform Extension,” ASME Paper No. GT2001-0484. [CrossRef]
Saha, A. K., Acharya, S., Prakash, C., and Bunker, R. S., 2003, “Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer With Pressure Side Winglet,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38620. [CrossRef]
Schabowski, Z., and Hodson, H., 2007, “The Reduction of Over Tip Leakage Loss in Unshrouded Axial Turbines Using Winglets and Squealers,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27623. [CrossRef]
Harvey, N. W., and Ramsden, K., 2001, “A Computational Study of a Novel Turbine Rotor Partial Shroud,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123(3), pp. 534–543. [CrossRef]
Harvey, N. W., Newman, D. A., Haselbach, F., and Willer, L., 2006, “An Investigation Into a Novel Turbine Rotor Winglet: Part I—Design and Model Rig Test Results,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-585. [CrossRef]
O'Dowd, D. O., Zhang, Q., He, L., Oldfield, M. L. G., Ligrani, P. M., Cheong, B. C. Y., and Tibbott, I., 2011, “Aerothermal Performance of a Winglet at Engine Representative Mach and Reynolds Numbers,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(4), p. 041026. [CrossRef]
Moore, J., Moore, J. G., Henry, G. S., and Chaudhry, U., 1989, “Flow and Heat Transfer in Turbine Tip Gaps,” ASME J. Turbomach., 111(3), pp. 301–309. [CrossRef]
Moore, J., and Elward, K. M., 1993, “Shock Formation in Overexpanded Tip Leakage Flow,” ASME J. Turbomach., 115(3), pp. 392–399. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q., O'Dowd, D. O., He, L., Wheeler, A. P. S., Ligrani, P. M., and Cheong, B. C. Y., 2011, “Overtip Shock Wave Structure and Its Impact on Turbine Blade Tip Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(4), p. 041001. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q., O'Dowd, D. O., He, L., Oldfield, M. L. G., and Ligrani, P. M., 2011, “Transonic Turbine Blade Tip Aerothermal Performance With Different Tip Gaps—Part I: Tip Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(4), p. 041027. [CrossRef]
Shyam, V., Ameri, A., and Chen, J., 2012, “Analysis of Unsteady Tip and Endwall Heat Transfer in a Highly Loaded Transonic Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(4), p. 041022. [CrossRef]
Wheeler, A. P. S., and Sandberg, D. S., 2012, “Direct Numerical Simulations of a Transonic Turbine Tip Flow,” 13th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT 13), Tokyo, Sept. 11–14, Paper No. ISUAAAT13-S9-3.
Wheeler, A. P. S., Atkins, N. R., and He, L., 2011, “Turbine Blade Tip Heat Transfer In Low Speed And High Speed Flows,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(4), p. 041025. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q., and He, L., 2011, “Overtip Choking and Its Implications on Turbine Blade-Tip Aerodynamics Performance,” J. Propul. Power, 27(5), pp. 1008–1014. [CrossRef]
Wheeler, A. P. S., Korakianitis, T., and Banneheke, S., 2011, “Tip Leakage Losses in Subsonic and Transonic Blade-Rows,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-751. [CrossRef]
Shyam, V., and Ameri, A., 2011, “Comparison of Various Supersonic Turbine Tip Designs to Minimize Aerodynamic Loss and Tip Heating,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-887. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q., and He, L., 2013, “Tip-Shaping for HP Turbine Blade Aero-Thermal Performance Management,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(5), p. 051025. [CrossRef]
He, L., Zhang, Q., Wheeler, A. P. S., and Atkins, N., 2010, “Over-Tip-Shaping for Heat Load Reduction,” UK Patent No. GB 1017797.0, UKIPO.
De Maesschalck, C., Lavagnoli, S., and Paniagua, G., 2014, “Blade Tip Shape Optimization for Enhanced Turbine Aerothermal Performance,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(4), p. 041016. [CrossRef]
Lavagnoli, S., Paniagua, G., De Maesschalck, C., and Yasa, T., 2013, “Analysis of the Unsteady Overtip Casing Heat Transfer in a High Speed Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(3), p. 031027. [CrossRef]
Celik, I. B., 2008, “Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130(7), p. 078001. [CrossRef]
Salvadori, S., Chana, K. S., Castillon, L., Montomoli, F., Martelli, F., and Adami, P., 2011, “Aerothermal Study of the Unsteady Flow Field in a Transonic Gas Turbine With Inlet Temperature Distortions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(3), p. 031030. [CrossRef]
Didier, F., Dénos, R., and Arts, T., 2002, “Unsteady Rotor Heat Transfer in a Transonic Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(4), pp. 614–622. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Tip carving design methodology

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Detailed view of the computational domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Geometrical cut sections for the evaluated tip shapes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Difference in heat transfer (ΔQ) onto the tip, SS (upper 25%) and the shroud between the medium and fine mesh solution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Flat-tip rotor geometry and computational grid and (b) detail of the unstructured overtip mesh for different tip designs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of experimental [38] and numerical isentropic Mach number and Nusselt number distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Midgap flow angle for the four investigated tip geometries: (a) variation along the midgap camberline and (b) contours of midgap flow angle for the flat and squealer (twice the range) blade tip designs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Relative Mach number distribution in the midgap section with overtip flow streamlines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Tip (a), shroud (b), and upper 25% SS (c) heat transfer along the machine axis (fraction of flat tip average heat load (W/m2))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Heat transfer distribution onto the blade tip, shroud and upper 25% of the rotor SS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Relative Mach number contours in four planes normal to the blade SS and rotor heat transfer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Total pressure and vorticity magnitude contours for the four tip geometries, 0.5Cax downstream of the rotor trailing edge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Pitchwise-averaged radial distributions of relative total pressure and vorticity magnitude (normalized by the flat tip average), 0.5Cax downstream of the rotor trailing edge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Overall performance comparison against a flat tip configuration




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In