Research Papers

Experimentally Verified Study of Regeneration-Induced Forced Response in Axial Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
Jens Aschenbruck

Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics,
Leibniz Universitaet Hannover,
Appelstr. 9,
Hannover 30167, Germany
e-mail: aschenbruck@tfd.uni-hannover.de

Joerg R. Seume

Senior Mem. ASME
Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics,
Leibniz Universitaet Hannover,
Appelstr. 9,
Hannover 30167, Germany
e-mail: seume@tfd.uni-hannover.de

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 25, 2014; final manuscript received August 1, 2014; published online September 30, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 137(3), 031006 (Sep 30, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1177; doi: 10.1115/1.4028350 History: Received July 25, 2014; Revised August 01, 2014

Geometrical variations occur in highly loaded turbine blades due to operation and regeneration. To determine the influence of such regeneration-induced variances of turbine blades on the aerodynamic excitation, a typical stagger angle variation of overhauled turbine blades is applied to stator vanes of an air turbine. This varied turbine stage is numerically and experimentally investigated. For the aerodynamic investigation of the vane wake, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are conducted. It is shown that the wake is changed due to the stagger angle variation. These results are confirmed by aerodynamic probe measurements in the air turbine. The vibration amplitude of the downstream rotor blades has been determined by a computational forced response analysis using a unidirectional fluid–structure interaction (FSI) approach and is experimentally verified here by tip-timing measurements. The results of the simulations and the measurements both show significantly higher amplitudes at certain operating points (OPs) due to the additional wake excitation. For typical regeneration-induced variations in stagger angle, the vibration amplitude is up to five times higher than in the reference case of uniform upstream stators. Based upon the present results, the influence of these variations and of the vane patterns on the vibration amplitude of the downstream rotor blade can and should be estimated in the regeneration process to minimize the dynamic stresses of the blades.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Vahdati, M., Sayma, A., and Imregun, M., 2000, “An Integrated Nonlinear Approach for Turbomachinery Forced Response Prediction. Part II: Case Studies,” J. Fluids Struct., 14(1), pp. 103–125. [CrossRef]
Bréard, C., Green, J., and Imregun, M., 2003, “Low-Engine-Order Excitation Mechanisms in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery,” J. Propul. Power, 19(4), pp. 704–712. [CrossRef]
Di Mare, L., Imregun, M., Smith, A., and Elliott, R., 2007, “A Numerical Study of High Pressure Turbine Forced Response in the Presence of Damaged Nozzle Guide Vanes,” Aeronaut. J., 111(1125), pp. 751–757.
Meyer, M., Parchem, R., and Davison, P., 2011, “Prediction of Turbine Rotor Blade Forcing Due to In-Service Stator Vane Trailing Edge Damage,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45204. [CrossRef]
Petrov, E., Di Mare, L., Hennings, H., and Elliott, R., 2010, “Forced Response of Mistuned Bladed Disks in Gas Flow: A Comparative Study of Predictions and Full-Scale Experimental Results,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(5), p. 052504. [CrossRef]
Pohle, L., Panning-von Scheidt, L., Aschenbruck, J., Seume, J., and Wallaschek, J., 2014, “Dynamical Behavior of a Mistuned Air Turbine: Comparison Between Simulations and Measurements,” ASME Turbo Expo, Duesseldorf, Germany, June 16–20, ASME Paper No. GT2014-26025. [CrossRef]
Carstens, V., Kemme, R., and Schmitt, S., 2003, “Coupled Simulation of Flow-Structure Interaction in Turbomachinery,” Aerospace Sci. Technol., 7(4), pp. 298–306. [CrossRef]
Hall, K., Thomas, J., Ekici, K., and Voytovyc, D., 2003, “Frequency Domain Techniques for Complex and Nonlinear Flows in Turbomachinery,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-3998. [CrossRef]
Chiang, H., and Kielb, R., 1993, “An Analysis System for Blade Forced Response,” ASME J. Turbomach., 115(4), pp. 762–770. [CrossRef]
Hennings, H., and Elliott, R., 2002, “Forced Response Experiments in a High Pressure Turbine Stage,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30453. [CrossRef]
Schwitzke, M., Schulz, A., and Bauer, H.-J., 2013, “Prediction of High-Frequency Blade Vibration Amplitudes in a Radial Inflow Turbine With Nozzle Guide Vanes,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94761. [CrossRef]
Washborn, R., and Kim, N.-E., 2006, “Investigation of Hardware Transmitted Excitation Sources and the Associated Blade Response Using Tip Timing Instrumentation,” 3rd EVI-GTI International Conference on Gas Turbine Instrumentation, Rome, Sept. 28–29.
Andersson, C., Grasbon, P., and Merchant, S., 2010, “Vibrations of the LH2 Turbine Rotor During the Vinci Engine Test Tip Timing Measurements and Predictions,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23413. [CrossRef]
Heath, S., and Imregun, M., 1998, “A Survey of Blade Tip-Timing Measurement Techniques for Turbomachinery Vibration,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 120(4), pp. 784–791. [CrossRef]
Aschenbruck, J., Meinzer, C., Pohle, L., Panning-von Scheidt, L., and Seume, J., 2013, “Regeneration-Induced Forced Response in Axial Turbines,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-95431. [CrossRef]
Aschenbruck, J., Meinzer, C., and Seume, J., 2013, “Influence of Regeneration-Induced Variances of Stator Vanes on the Vibration Behavior of Rotor Blades in Axial Turbines,” 10th European Turbomachinery Conference (ETC), Lappeeranta, Finland, Apr. 15–19, Paper No. A113.
Campobasso, M., and Giles, M., 2000, “Analysis of the Effect of Mistuning on Turbomachinery Aeroelasticity,” 9th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT 2000), Lyon, France, Sept. 4–8, pp. 885–896.
Zhai, Y., Bladh, R., and Dyverfeldt, G., 2012, “Aeroelastic Stability Assessment of an Industrial Compressor Blade Including Mistuning Effects,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(6), p. 060903. [CrossRef]
Bammert, K., Bohnenkamp, W., and Woelk, G.-U., 1973, “Strömungskanäle zum Kalibrieren von Druck-, Temperatur- und Geschwindigkeitssonden,” Konstruktion25(7), pp. 245–254.
Rieß, W., and Braun, M., 2003, “Stationäres und instationäres Verhalten verschiedener Typen von Stroemungs-Messsonden in instationaerer Stroemung,” DFG Final Report No. Ri 375/13-1, Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Herbst, F., Bluemel, S., Fakiolas, E., and Seume, J., 2011, “Numerical Investigation of the Interaction Between Probe, Flow and Blading in an Axial-Turbine,” International Gas Turbine Congress, Osaka, Japan, Nov. 13–18, Paper No. IGTC2011-0194.
Herbst, F., Kozulovic, D., and Seume, J., 2013, “Transition Modeling for Vortex Generating Jets on Low-Pressure Turbine Profiles,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(1), p. 011038. [CrossRef]
Rose, M., Mansour, M., and Schuepbach, P., 2009, “The Thermodynamics of Wake Blade Interaction in Axial Flow Turbines: Combined Experimental and Computational Study,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59655. [CrossRef]
Jinting, W., Dandan, L., Feng, J., and Zhang, C., 2013, “Accuracy of the Half-Power Bandwidth Method With a Third-Order Correction for Estimating Damping in Multi-DOF Systems,” J. Earthquake Eng., 12(1), pp. 33–38. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Five-stage air turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Campbell diagram and EFs of the rotor blade stage five

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Five-hole pneumatic probe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Tip-timing probes installed in the axial air turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Position of the tip-timing probes (perspective: upstream)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Computational mesh of the fifth stage at midspan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relative total pressure downstream of the last turbine stage at OP2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Velocity downstream of the last turbine stage at OP2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of the wakes at OP2 of the reference and the alternating vane at midspan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Integrated pressure on the blade from unsteady CFD in time domain and the frequency domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Flow chart of the unidirectional FSI approach using the harmonic response analysis [15]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Numerically determined blade vibration amplitudes for two configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Blade vibration amplitude for reference and alternating configuration at OP1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

High scatter of the blade resonance frequencies at OP1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Low scatter of the blade resonance frequencies at OP2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Blade vibration amplitude for reference and alternating configuration at OP2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Blade vibration amplitude for reference and alternating configuration at OP3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Comparison of the simulated and measured blade vibration amplitudes for different OPs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Sensitivity of the vibration amplitude depending on the damping ratio and comparison to the experimental results




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In