0
Research Papers

Secondary Flows, Endwall Effects, and Stall Detection in Axial Compressor Design

[+] Author and Article Information
Milan Banjac

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Belgrade,
Belgrade 11120, Serbia
e-mail: mbbanjac@mas.bg.ac.rs

Milan V. Petrovic

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Belgrade,
Belgrade 11120, Serbia
e-mail: mpetrovic@mas.bg.ac.rs

Alexander Wiedermann

MAN Diesel and Turbo SE,
Oberhausen 46145, Germany
e-mail: alexander.wiedermann@man.eu

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 25, 2014; final manuscript received September 10, 2014; published online November 18, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 137(5), 051004 (May 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1179; doi: 10.1115/1.4028648 History: Received July 25, 2014; Revised September 10, 2014; Online November 18, 2014

This paper describes a methodology and a fully tested and calibrated mathematical model for the treatment of endwall effects in axial compressor aerodynamic calculations. Additional losses and deviations caused by the clearance and secondary flows are analyzed. These effects are coupled with endwall boundary layer losses (EWBL) and blockage development. Stall/surge detection is included, and mutual interaction of different loss mechanisms is considered. Individual mathematical correlations for different effects have been created or adopted from earlier papers with the aim of forming one integral model that is completely described in this paper. Separate mathematical correlations and calibration measures are discussed in detail in the first part of the paper. The developed overall model is suitable for application in two-dimensional (2D) or mean-line compressor flow calculations. During the development, it was tested, calibrated, and validated using throughflow calculations comparing numerical results with experimental data for a large number of test cases. These test cases include compressors with very different configurations and operating ranges. The data on the compressors were taken from the open literature or obtained from industrial partners.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Davis, W. R., 1970, “A Computer Program for Analysis and Design of the Flow in Turbomachinery, Part B—Loss and Deviation Correlations,” Division of Aerothermodynamics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, Report No. ME/A70-1.
Jansen, W., and Moffat, W. C., 1967, “The Off-Design Analysis of Axial-Flow Compressors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 89(4), pp. 453–462. [CrossRef]
Swan, W. C., 1961, “A Practical Method of Predicting Transonic-Compressor Performance,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 83(3), pp. 322–330. [CrossRef]
Pfitzinger, W. E., 1998, Kennfeldberechnung für Axialverdichter mit Systematischer Untersuchung der Verlust und Umlenkeigenschaften von Schaufelgittern, Fortschritt-Berichte VDI Reihe 7 Nr. 337, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Waltke, U., 1995, Berechnung des Meridianströmungsfeldes in Axialverdichtern mit der Methode der Finiten Elemente, Fortschritt-Berichte VDI Reihe 7 Nr. 261, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Aungier, H. R., 2003, Axial-Flow Compressors, ASME, New York.
Petrovic, M. V., and Riess, W., 1997, “Off-Design Flow Analysis and Performance Prediction of Axial Turbines,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-55.
Petrovic, M. V., Wiedermann, A., and Banjac, M., 2009, “Development and Validation of a New Universal Throughflow Method for Axial Compressors,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59938. [CrossRef]
Lieblein, S., 1965, “Experimental Flow in Two-Dimensional Cascades,” Aerodynamic Design of Axial-Flow Compressors, I. A.Johnsen, and R. O.Bullock, eds., NASA, Washington DC, NASA SP-36, pp. 183–225.
Taylor, W. E., Murrin, T. A., and Colombo, R. M., 1970, “Systematic Two-Dimensional Cascade Tests, Vol. 2. Multiple Circular Arc Hydrofoils,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No. CR-72499.
Lieblein, S., 1959, “Loss and Stall Analysis of Compressor Cascades,” ASME J. Basic Eng., 81(3), pp. 387–400.
Banjac, M., Petrovic, M. V., and Wiedermann, A., 2013, “A New Loss and Deviation Model for Axial Compressor Inlet Guide Vanes,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-95020. [CrossRef]
Denton, J. D., 1993, “Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 115(4), pp. 621–656. [CrossRef]
Williams, R., Gregory-Smith, D., He, L., and Ingram, G., 2010, “Experiments and Computations on Large Tip Clearance Effects in a Linear Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132(2), p. 021018. [CrossRef]
Koenig, W. M., Hennecke, D. K., and Fottner, L., 1996, “Improved Blade Profile Loss and Deviation Angle Models for Advanced Transonic Compressor Bladings: Part I—A Model for Subsonic Flow,” ASME J. Turbomach., 118(1), pp. 73–80. [CrossRef]
Traupel, W., 1988, Thermische Turbomaschinen, Vol. 1, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Morris, A. W. H., and Hoare, R. G., 1975, “Secondary Loss Measurements in a Cascade of Turbine Blades With Meridional Wall Profiling,” ASME Paper No. 75-WA/GT-13.
Roberts, W. B., Serovy, G. K., and Sandercock, D. M., 1986, “Modeling the 3D Flow Effects on Deviation Angle for Axial Compressor Middle Stages,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 108(1), pp. 131–137. [CrossRef]
Lakshminarayana, B., 1970, “Methods of Predicting the Tip Clearance Effects in Axial Flow Turbomachines,” ASME J. Basic Eng., 92(3), pp. 467–482. [CrossRef]
Mellor, G. L., and Wood, G. M., 1970, “An Axial Compressor End-Wall Boundary Layer Theory,” ASME Paper No. 70-GT-80.
Hirsch, Ch., 1974, “Endwall Boundary Layers in Axial Compressors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 96(4), pp. 413–426. [CrossRef]
Young, A. D., 1989, Boundary Layers, BSP Professional Books, Oxford, UK.
Waltz, A., 1979, “Approximation Theory for Boundary Layer Suction Through Individual Slits,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, NACA Report No. TM-75384.
Koch, C. C., 1981, “Stalling Pressure Rise Capability of Axial Flow Compressor Stages,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 103(4), pp. 645–656. [CrossRef]
Traulsen, D., 1989, Axialverdichterpruefstand zur Untersuchung von Randzonenstroemungen, Fortschritt-Berichte, VDI Reihe 7, Nr. 161, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Urasek, D. C., Gorrell, W. T., and Cunnan, W. S., 1979, “Performance of Two-Stage Fan Having Low-Aspect-Ratio, First-Stage Rotor Blading,” NASA Report No. TP-1493.
Mattiske, B., 1994, Experimentelle Untersuchung einer mehrstufigen Axialverdichterbeschufelung mit Randzonen-Korrektur, Fortschritt-Berichte, VDI Reihe 7, Nr. 252, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hirsch, Ch., and Denton, J. D., 1981, “Through Flow Calculations in Axial Turbomachines,” Advisory Group for Aerospace Reserach & Development, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, Report No. AGARD-AR-175, pp. 229–255.
Sandercock, M. D., Kovach, K., and Lieblein, S., 1954, “Experimental Investigation of a Five-Stage Axial-Flow Research Compressor With Transonic Rotors in All Stages. I—Compressor Design,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, NACA Report No. RM-E54F24.
Voit, C. H., 1953, “Investigation of a High-Pressure-Ratio Eight-Stage Axial-Flow Research Compressor With Two Transonic Inlet Stages, I—Aerodynamic Design,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, NACA Report No. RM-E53I24.
Cline, S. J., Fesler, W., Liu, H. S., Lovell, R. C., and Shaffer, S. J., 1983, “High Pressure Compressor Component Performance Report,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No. CR-168245.
Holloway, P. R., Knight, G. L., Koch, C. C., and Shaffer, S. J., 1982, “Energy Efficient Engine High Pressure Compressor Detail Design Report,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No. CR-165558.
Schetz, J. A., 1993, Boundary Layer Analyses, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Ferziger, J. H., and Perić, M., 2002, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd rev. ed, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 298–299.
Bredberg, J., 2001, “On Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Models,” Department of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, Report No. 01/8.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

2D cascade geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of shroud leakage loss

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of tip clearance leakage loss-forming mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Simplified blade velocity distribution used in the tip clearance loss model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Spanwise distribution of additional losses; (a) shrouded stator and (b) unshrouded rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Overall performance of UH 2-stage fan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Overall performance of NASA 2-stage fan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Overall performance of UH 3-stage compressor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Static and total pressure and temperature behind the rows of UH 3-stage compressor—the design operating point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Overall performance of Sulzer 4-stage compressor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Overall performance of NACA 5-stage compressor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Overall performance of NACA 8-stage compressor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Overall performance of EEE 10-stage compressor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Overall performance of MAN 11-stage compressor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Normalized total temperatures and total pressures behind the stages of MAN 11-stage compressor—the design operating point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Blockage development for EEE 10-stage compressor in a nominal regime (total pressure ratio = 23)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In