Research Papers

Future Use of Large Eddy Simulation in Aero‐engines

[+] Author and Article Information
James C. Tyacke

Whittle Laboratory,
Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB3 0DY, UK
e-mail: jct53@cam.ac.uk

Paul G. Tucker

Whittle Laboratory,
Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB3 0DY, UK

We note Chapman's outer layer estimates are optimistic.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received November 28, 2014; final manuscript received December 9, 2014; published online January 28, 2015. Editor: Kenneth C. Hall.

J. Turbomach 137(8), 081005 (Aug 01, 2015) (16 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1308; doi: 10.1115/1.4029363 History: Received November 28, 2014; Revised December 09, 2014; Online January 28, 2015

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a critical tool in the design of aero-engines. Increasing demand for higher efficiency, performance, and reduced emissions of noise and pollutants has focused attention on secondary flows, small scale internal flows, and flow interactions. In conjunction with low order correlations and experimental data, RANS (Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes) modeling has been used effectively for some time, particularly at high Reynolds numbers and at design conditions. However, the range of flows throughout an engine is vast, with most, in reality being inherently unsteady. There are many cases where RANS can perform poorly, particularly in zones characterized by strong streamline curvature, separation, transition, relaminarization, and heat transfer. The reliable use of RANS has also been limited by its strong dependence on turbulence model choice and related ad-hoc corrections. For complex flows, large-eddy simulation (LES) methods provide reliable solutions, largely independent of turbulence model choice, and at a relatively low cost for particular flows. LES can now be used to provide in depth knowledge of flow physics, for example, in areas such as transition and real wall roughness effects. This can be used to inform RANS and lower order modeling (LOM). For some flows, LES can now even be used for design. Existing literature is used to show the potential of LES for a range of flows in different zones of the engine. Based on flow taxonomy, best practices including RANS/LES zonalization, meshing requirements, and turbulent inflow conditions are introduced, leading to the proposal of a tentative expert system for industrial use. In this way, LES becomes a well controlled tool, suitable for design use and reduces the burden on the end user. The problem sizes tackled however have lagged behind potential computing power, hence future LES use at scale requires substantial progress in several key areas. Current and future solver technologies are thus examined and the potential current and future use of LES is considered.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Vogt, D. M., and Fransson, T. H., 2002, “A New Turbine Cascade for Aeromechanical Testing,” 16th Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines, Cambridge, UK, Sept. 23–24.
Pullan, G., Young, A. M., and Day, I. J., 2012, “Origins and Structure of Spike-Type Rotating Stall,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68707. [CrossRef]
Tyacke, J., and Tucker, P., 2012, “LES of Heat Transfer in Electronics,” Appl. Math. Modell., 36(7), pp. 3112–3133. [CrossRef]
Tucker, P. G., 2011, “Computation of Unsteady Turbomachinery Flows: Part 1—Progress and Challenges,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 47(7), pp. 522–545. [CrossRef]
Denton, J. D., and Dawes, W. N., 1998, “Computational Fluid Dynamics for Turbomachinery Design,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 213(2), pp. 107–124. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R., 1994, “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA J., 32(8), pp. 1598–1605. [CrossRef]
Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J., and Rodi, W., 1975, “Progress in the Development of a Reynolds-Stress Turbulent Closure,” J. Fluid Mech., 68(3), pp. 537–566. [CrossRef]
Rumsey, C. L., Pettersson-Reif, B. A., and Gatski, T. B., 2006, “Arbitrary Steady-State Solutions With the k-Epsilon Model,” AIAA J., 44(7), pp. 1586–1592. [CrossRef]
Tucker, P., 2013, “Trends in Turbomachinery Turbulence Treatments,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 63, pp. 1–32. [CrossRef]
Spalart, P. R., Jou, W.-H., Strelets, M., and Allmaras, S. R., 1997, “Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach,” First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES in Advances in DNS/LES, Ruston, LA, Aug. 4–8, pp. 137–147.
Spalart, P. R., 2009, “Detached-Eddy Simulation,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41(1), pp. 181–202. [CrossRef]
Tucker, P., Eastwood, S., Klostermeier, C., Jefferson-Loveday, R., Tyacke, J., and Liu, Y., 2010, “Hybrid LES Approach for Practical Turbomachinery Flows: Part 1—Hierarchy and Example Simulations,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23431. [CrossRef]
Tucker, P., Eastwood, S., Klostermeier, C., Xia, H., Ray, P., Tyacke, J., and Dawes, W., 2010, “Hybrid LES Approach for Practical Turbomachinery Flows: Part 2—Further Applications,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23807. [CrossRef]
You, D., Wang, M., Mittal, R., and Moin, P., 2003, “Study of Rotor Tip-Clearance Flow Using Large-Eddy Simulation,” 41st Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, Jan. 6–9, AIAA Paper No. 2003–838. [CrossRef]
Tyacke, J., Tucker, P. G., Jefferson-Loveday, R., Rao Vadlamani, N., Watson, R., and Naqavi, I., 2013, “LES for Turbines: Methodologies, Cost and Future Outlooks,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94416. [CrossRef]
Chapman, D., Hans, M., and Pirtle, M. W., 1975, “Computers vs. Wind Tunnels for Aerodynamic Flow Simulations,” Astronaut. Aeronaut., 13(4), pp. 12–35. [CrossRef]
Qiu, X.-W., Anderson, M., and Japikse, D., 2010, “An Integrated Design System for Turbomachinery,” J. Hydrodyn., Ser. B, 22(5), pp. 358–365. [CrossRef]
Rubio, G., Valero, E., and Lanzan, S., 2012, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Expert System Using Artificial Neural Networks,” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 6, pp. 40–44.
Knight, B., and Petridis, M., 1992, “FLOWES: An Intelligent Computational Fluid Dynamics System,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 5(1), pp. 51–58. [CrossRef]
Andrews, A. E., 1988, “Progress and Challenges in the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Computational Fluid Dynamics,” AIAA J., 26(1), pp. 40–46. [CrossRef]
Collado Morata, E., Gourdain, N., Duchaine, F., and Gicquel, L., 2012, “Effects of Free-Stream Turbulence on High Pressure Turbine Blade Heat Transfer Predicted by Structured and Unstructured LES,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 55(21–22), pp. 5754–5768. [CrossRef]
Sagaut, P., Garnier, E., Tromeur, E., Larcheveque, L., and Labourasse, E., 2004, “Turbulent Inflow Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulation of Compressible Wall-Bounded Flows,” AIAA J., 42(3), pp. 469–477. [CrossRef]
Jewkes, J., 2008, “An Improved Turbulent Boundary Layer Inflow Condition, Applied to the Simulation of Jets in Cross-Flow,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Keating, A., Piomelli, U., Balaras, E., and Kaltenbach, H.-J., 2004, “A Priori and A Posteriori Tests of Inflow Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulation,” Phys. Fluids, 16(12), pp. 4696–4712. [CrossRef]
Tabor, G., and Baba-Ahmadi, M., 2010, “Inlet Conditions for Large Eddy Simulation: A Review,” Comput. Fluids, 39(4), pp. 553–567. [CrossRef]
Lund, T. S., Wu, X., and Squires, K. D., 1998, “Generation of Turbulent Inflow Data for Spatially-Developing Boundary Layer Simulations,” J. Comput. Phys., 140(2), pp. 233–258. [CrossRef]
Schluter, J. U., Wu, X., Kim, S., Shankaran, S., Alonso, J. J., and Pitsch, H., 2005, “A Framework for Coupling Reynolds-Averaged With Large-Eddy Simulations for Gas Turbine Applications,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 127(4), pp. 806–815. [CrossRef]
Wu, X., 2010, “Establishing the Generality of Three Phenomena Using a Boundary Layer With Free-Stream Passing Wakes,” J. Fluid Mech., 664, pp. 193–219. [CrossRef]
Rao Vadlamani, N., 2013, “High Fidelity Large Eddy Simulation of Turbines: Current Status and Future Outlook,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mathey, F., Cokjlat, D., Bertoglio, J. P., and Sergent, E., 2003, “Specification of LES Inlet Boundary Condition Using Vortex Method,” 4th International Symposium on Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer (THMT 4), Antalya, Turkey, Oct. 12–17.
Kraichnan, R. H., 1970, “Diffusion by a Random Velocity Field,” Phys. Fluids, 13(1), pp. 22–31. [CrossRef]
Labourasse, E., and Sagaut, P., 2002, “Reconstruction of Turbulent Fluctuations Using a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach,” J. Comput. Phys., 182(1), pp. 301–336. [CrossRef]
Laraufie, R., Deck, S., and Sagaut, P., 2011, “A Dynamic Forcing Method for Unsteady Turbulent Inflow Conditions,” J. Comput. Phys., 230(23), pp. 8647–8663. [CrossRef]
O'Mahoney, T. S. D., 2011, “Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbine Rim Seals,” Ph.D. thesis, Surrey University, Surrey, UK.
Klein, M., Sadiki, A., and Janicka, J., 2003, “A Digital Filter Based Generation of Inflow Data for Spatially Developing Direct Numerical or Large Eddy Simulations,” J. Comput. Phys., 186(2), pp. 652–665. [CrossRef]
Jarrin, N., Prosser, R., Uribe, J.-C., Benhamadouche, S., and Laurence, D., 2009, “Reconstruction of Turbulent Fluctuations for Hybrid RANS/LES Simulations Using a Synthetic-Eddy Method,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 30(3), pp. 435–442. [CrossRef]
Perret, L., Delville, J., Manceau, R., and Bonnet, J.-P., 2008, “Turbulent Inflow Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulation Based on Low-Order Empirical Model,” Phys. Fluids, 20(7), p. 075107. [CrossRef]
Druault, P., Lardeau, S., Bonnet, J.-P., Coiffet, F., Delville, J., Lamballais, E., Largeau, J.-F., and Perret, L., 2004, “Generation of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Inlet Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulation,” AIAA J., 42(3), pp. 447–456. [CrossRef]
Eastwood, S., 2010, “Hybrid LES-RANS of Complex Geometry Jets,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Batten, P., Goldberg, U., and Chakravarthy, S., 2004, “Interfacing Statistical Turbulence Closures With Large-Eddy Simulation,” AIAA J., 42(3), pp. 485–492. [CrossRef]
Xiao, F., Dianat, M., and Mcguirk, J. J., 2010, “A Recycling/Rescaling Method for LES Inlet Condition Generation,” 8th International ERCOFTAC Symposium (ETMM8), Marseille, France, June 9–11, Vol. 2, No. 1992, pp. 510–515.
Wang, P. C., and Mcguirk, J. J., 2013, “Large Eddy Simulation of Supersonic Jet Plumes From Rectangular Con-Di Nozzles,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 43(1), pp. 62–73. [CrossRef]
Shur, M. L., Spalart, P. R., Strelets, M. K., and Travin, A. K., 2003, “Towards the Prediction of Noise From Jet Engines,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 24(4), pp. 551–561. [CrossRef]
Tucker, P. G., 2013, Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics in Aeronautics, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Hu, F. Q., 2001, “A Stable, Perfectly Matched Layer for Linearized Euler Equations in Unsplit Physical Variables,” J. Comput. Phys., 173(2), pp. 455–480. [CrossRef]
Giles, M. B., 1990, “Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for Euler Equation Calculations,” AIAA J., 28(12), pp. 2050–2058. [CrossRef]
Pauley, L. L., Moin, P., and Reynolds, W. C., 1990, “The Structure of Two-Dimensional Separation,” J. Fluid Mech., 220(397–411), p. C864. [CrossRef]
Ashcroft, G., and Zhang, X., 2001, “A Computational Investigation of the Noise Radiated by Flow-Induced Cavity Oscillations,” 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, Jan. 8–11, AIAA Paper No. 2001-0512. [CrossRef]
Ffowcs Williams, J. E., and Hawkings, D. L., 1969, “Sound Generation by Turbulence and Surfaces in Arbitrary Motion,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 264(1151), pp. 321–342. [CrossRef]
Tam, C. K. W., 1998, “Advances in Numerical Boundary Conditions for Computational Aeroacoustics,” J. Comput. Acoust., 6(4), pp. 377–402. [CrossRef]
Poinsot, T. J., and K, L. S., 1992, “Boundary Conditions for Direct Simulations of Compressible Viscous Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 101(1), pp. 104–129. [CrossRef]
He, L., 2013, “Fourier Spectral Modelling for Multi-Scale Aero-Thermal Analysis,” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 27(2), pp. 118–129. [CrossRef]
Pierce, C., and Moin, P., 1998, “Method for Generating Equilibrium Swirling Inflow Conditions,” AIAA J., 36(7), pp. 6–8. [CrossRef]
Schluter, J. U., Pitsch, H., and Moin, P., 2005, “Outflow Conditions for Integrated Large Eddy Simulation/Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations,” AIAA J., 43(1), pp. 156–164. [CrossRef]
Schluter, J. U., Pitsch, H., and Moin, P., 2004, “Large Eddy Simulation Inflow Conditions for Coupling With Reynolds-Averaged Flow Solvers,” AIAA J., 42(3), pp. 478–484. [CrossRef]
Patil, S. S., 2011, “Large Eddy Simulations of High Reynolds Number Complex Flows With Synthetic Inlet Turbulence,” Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Medic, G., Kalitzin, G., You, D., Herrmann, M., Ham, F., ven der Weide, E., Pitsch, H., and Alonso, J., 2006, “Integrated RANS/LES Computations of Turbulent Flow Through a Turbofan Jet Engine,” Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, pp. 275–285.
Fröhlich, J., and von Terzi, D., 2008, “Hybrid LES/RANS Methods for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 44(5), pp. 349–377. [CrossRef]
He, S., Ariyaratne, C., and Vardy, A. E., 2011, “Wall Shear Stress in Accelerating Turbulent Pipe Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 685, pp. 440–460. [CrossRef]
Giles, M. B., 1988, “Calculation of Unsteady Wake/Rotor Interaction,” J. Propul. Power, 4(4), pp. 356–362. [CrossRef]
Giles, M., 1991, “UNSFLO: A Numerical Method for the Calculation of Unsteady Flow in Turbomachinery,” Massachussetts Institute of Technology Gas Turbine Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, GTL Technical Report No. 205.
Connell, M., Braaten, L., Zori, R., Steed, B., Hutchinson, B., and Cox, G., 2011, “A Comparison of Advanced Numerical Techniques to Model Transient Flow in Turbomachinery Blade Rows,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45820. [CrossRef]
Grinstein, F., F., Fureby, C., and DeVore, C., R., 2005, “On MILES Based on Flux-Limiting Algorithms,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 47(10–11), pp. 1043–1051. [CrossRef]
Orzag, S. A., 1971, “Accurate Solution of the Orr-Sommerfeld Stability Equation,” J. Fluid Mech., 50(4), pp. 689–703. [CrossRef]
Roe, P., 1981, “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors and Difference Schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., 43(2), pp. 357–372. [CrossRef]
Debonis, J. R., and Scott, J. N., 2002, “Study of the Error and Efficiency of Numerical Schemes for Computational Aeroacoustics,” AIAA J., 40(2), pp. 227–234. [CrossRef]
Jameson, A., 2007, “Formulation of Kinetic Energy Preserving Conservative Schemes for Gas Dynamics and Direct Numerical Simulation of One-Dimensional Viscous Compressible Flow in a Shock Tube Using Entropy and Kinetic Energy Preserving Schemes,” J. Sci. Comput., 34(2), pp. 188–208. [CrossRef]
Reynolds-Barredo, J., Newman, D., Sanchez, R., Samaddar, D., Berry, L., and Elwasif, W., 2012, “Mechanisms for the Convergence of Time-Parallelized, Parareal Turbulent Plasma Simulations,” J. Comput. Phys., 231(23), pp. 7851–7867. [CrossRef]
Chapman, D., 1979, “Computational Aerodynamics, Development and Outlook,” AIAA J., 17(12), pp. 1293–1313. [CrossRef]
Choi, H., and Moin, P., 2012, “Grid-Point Requirements for Large Eddy Simulation: Chapman's Estimates Revisited,” Phys. Fluids, 24(1), p. 011702. [CrossRef]
Peskin, C. S., 1972, “Flow Patterns Around Heart Valves: A Numerical Method,” J. Comput. Phys., 10(2), pp. 252–271. [CrossRef]
Peskin, C. S., 2002, “The Immersed Boundary Method,” Acta Numer., 11, pp. 479–517. [CrossRef]
Addad, Y., Gaitonde, U., Laurence, D., and Rolfo, S., 2008, “Optimal Unstructured Meshing for Large Eddy Simulations,” Qual. Reliab. Large-Eddy Simul., 12(1), pp. 93–103. [CrossRef]
Park, M. A., 2004, “Adjoint-Based, Three-Dimensional Error Prediction and Grid Adaptation,” AIAA J., 42(9), pp. 1854–1862. [CrossRef]
Larsson, J., and Wang, Q., 2014, “The Prospect of Using LES and DES in Engineering Design, and the Research Required to Get There,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 372(2022), p. 20130329. [CrossRef]
Gargallo-Peir, A., Roca, X., Peraire, J., and Sarrate, J., 2013, “Defining Quality Measures for Validation and Generation of High-Order Tetrahedral Meshes,” Proceedings of the 22nd International Meshing Roundtable, Orlando, FL, Oct. 13–16, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 109–126. [CrossRef]
Löhner, R., and Baum, J. D., 2013, “Handling Tens of Thousands of Cores With Industrial/Legacy Codes: Approaches, Implementation and Timings,” Comput. Fluids, 85, pp. 53–62. [CrossRef]
Giles, M., and Reguly, I., 2014, “Trends in High Performance Computing for Engineering Calculations,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 372(2022), p. 20130319. [CrossRef]
Kennedy, A., and Parsons, M., 2013, “ARCHER: A New UK Service for Academic Research,” EPCC News, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Kogge, P., Bergman, K., Borkar, S., Campbell, D., Carlson, W., Dally, W., Denneau, M., Franzon, P., Harrod, W., Hil, K., Hiller, J., Karp, S., Keckler, S., Klein, D., Lucas, R., Richards, M., Scarpelli, A., Scott, S., Snavely, A., Sterling, T., Williams, R. S., and Yelick, K., 2008, “ExaScale Computing Study: Technology Challenges in Achieving Exascale Systems,” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Information Processing Techniques Office (IPTO), Arlington, VA, Technical Report No. 15.
Shacham, A., and Bergman, K., 2007, “Building Ultralow-Latency Interconnection Networks Using Photonic Integration,” IEEE Micro, 27(4), pp. 6–20. [CrossRef]
Tucker, P., 2011, “Computation of Unsteady Turbomachinery Flows: Part 2—LES and Hybrids,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 47(7), pp. 546–569. [CrossRef]
Pope, S. B., 2000, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University, Press, New York.
Gamard, S., and George, W., 1999, “Reynolds Number Dependence of Energy Spectra in the Overlap Region of Isotropic Turbulence,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 63(1–4), pp. 443–477. [CrossRef]
Ahn, J., Choi, H., and Lee, J. S., 2005, “Large Eddy Simulation of Flow and Heat Transfer in a Channel Roughened by Square or Semicircle Ribs,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127(2), pp. 263–269. [CrossRef]
Viswanathan, A. K., and Tafti, D. K., 2006, “Detached Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in a Two-Pass Internal Cooling Duct,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 27(1), pp. 1–20. [CrossRef]
Mendez, S., Shoeybi, M., Lele, S. K., and Moin, P., 2013, “On the Use of the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings Equation to Predict Far-Field Jet Noise From Large-Eddy Simulations,” Int. J. Aeroacoust., 12(1–2), pp. 1–20. [CrossRef]
Piomelli, U., Cabot, W. H., Moin, P., and Lee, S., 1991, “Subgrid-Scale Backscatter in Turbulent and Transitional Flows,” Phys. Fluids A, 3(7), pp. 1766–1771. [CrossRef]
Schlatter, P., Stolz, S., and Kleiser, L., 2004, “LES of Transitional Flows Using the Approximate Deconvolution Model,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 25(3), pp. 549–558. [CrossRef]
McMullan, W., and Page, G., 2012, “Towards Large Eddy Simulation of Gas Turbine Compressors,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 52, pp. 30–47. [CrossRef]
Jefferson-Loveday, R. J., Nagabhushana Rao, V., Tyacke, J. C., and Tucker, P. G., 2013, “High-Order Detached Eddy Simulation, Zonal LES and URANS of Cavity and Labyrinth Seal Flows,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 73(9), pp. 830–846. [CrossRef]
Deck, S., 2012, “Recent Improvements in the Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) Formulation,” Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 26(6), pp. 523–550. [CrossRef]
Pitsch, H., Desjardins, O., Balarac, G., and Ihme, M., 2008, “Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Reacting Flows,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 44(6), pp. 466–478. [CrossRef]
Georgiadis, N. J., Rizzetta, D. P., and Fureby, C., 2009, “Large-Eddy Simulation: Current Capabilities, Recommended Practices, and Future Research,” AIAA J., 48(8), pp. 1772–1784. [CrossRef]
You, D., Mittal, R., Wang, M., and Moin, P., 2004, “Computational Methodology for Large-Eddy Simulation of Tip-Clearance Flows,” AIAA J., 42(2), pp. 271–279. [CrossRef]
Medic, G., Joo, J., Milanovic, I., and Sharma, O., 2013, “Large-Eddy Simulation for Turbine Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-95841. [CrossRef]
Sewall, E. A., and Tafti, D. K., 2008, “Large Eddy Simulation of Flow and Heat Transfer in the Developing Flow Region of a Rotating Gas Turbine Blade Internal Cooling Duct With Coriolis and Buoyancy Forces,” ASME J. Turbomach., 130(1), p. 011005. [CrossRef]
Mockett, C., Knacke, T., and Thiele, F., 2010, “Detection of Initial Transient and Estimation of Statistical Error in Time-Resolved Turbulent Flow Data,” 8th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements (ETMM8), Marseille, France, June 9–11.
Jambunathan, K., Lai, E., Hartle, S., and Button, B., 1991, “Development of an Intelligent Front-End for a Computational Fluid Dynamics Package,” Artif. Intell. Eng., 6(1), pp. 27–35. [CrossRef]
Ali, Z., and Tucker, P. G., 2013, “Multiblock Structured Mesh Generation for Turbomachinery Flows,” Proceedings of the 22nd International Meshing Roundtable, Orlando, FL, Oct. 13–16, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, No. 20, pp. 165–182.
Smith, W., 2001, “A Framework for Control and Observation in Distributed Environments,” NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, Technical Report No. NAS-01-006.
Nemec, M., Aftosmis, M. J., and Pulliam, T. H., 2004, “On the Use of Parametric-CAD Systems and Cartesian Methods for Aerodynamic Design,” 3rd International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD3), Toronto, Canada, July 12–16, Springer-Verlag, pp. 699–704.
Aftosmis, M. J., 1999, “On the Use of CAD-Native Predicates and Geometry in Surface Meshing,” NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA, Technical Report No. NASA/TM-1999-208782.
Tucker, P., Goodhand, M., and Jefferson-Loveday, R., 2013, “DNS of Real Roughness,” UK Turbulence Consortium Workshop, Southampton, UK, Sept. 9–Oct. 10.
Tyacke, J., Jefferson-Loveday, R., and Tucker, P. G., 2013, “On the Application of LES to Seal Geometries,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 91(4), pp. 827–848. [CrossRef]
Jefferson-Loveday, R., Tucker, P. G., Northall, J. D., and Rao, N., 2013, “Differential Equation Specification of Integral Turbulence Length Scales,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(3), p. 031013. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

LES hierarchy indicating importance of each element

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Number of LES publications in turbomachinery compared to other disciplines and available computational power

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Potential inflow options for idealized turbulence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Merging of wake, BL, and freestream turbulence for a LPT simulation (vorticity magnitude contours)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Inputs to flow field in a real propulsive jet nozzle: (a) potential inputs for real jet nozzles and (b) idealized and realistic inputs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Jet LES with outer sponge zone indicated

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Example of physics coupling for a turbine passage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Grid topology influence on T–S wave decay. % error in amplitude at ca. 50% domain length.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Use of numerical schemes in literature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Numerical influence on HDT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Tiling and (b) parareal methods to avoid communication and increase parallelism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

HDT for various SGS models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Grid point requirements for LES and hybrid RANS–(N)LES compared with typical grid densities used in existing literature for (a) turbomachinery and (b) airframe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Use of a model energy spectrum to improve grid resolution for a turbine blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Summary of validation levels contrasting turbomachinery and airframe zones (%)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Numerous choices related to eddy-resolving methods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Frequency of modeling methods used for turbomachinery contrasted with those for airframes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Example engine-level RANS/LES zonalization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Example component-level RANS/LES zonalization based on flow features

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Example class A flows: (a) ribbed ducts, (b) CBTEs, and (c) predominantly free-shear flows

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Example class B LPT flow and potential inflow requirements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Example class C flows: (a) HPT and (b) labyrinth/rim-seals

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Examples of an expert system for (a) internal cooling passages and (b) an LPT blade passage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Example of an expert system menu for different engine zones

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Interdisciplinary interactions required

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

Potential uses of eddy-resolving simulations




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In