0
Research Papers

Investigation of Nonaxisymmetric Endwall Contouring and Three-Dimensional Airfoil Design in a 1.5 Stage Axial Turbine—Part II: Experimental Validation

[+] Author and Article Information
Jens Niewoehner

Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jens.niewoehner@man.eu

Thorsten Poehler, Peter Jeschke

Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany

Yavuz Guendogdu

MTU Aero Engines AG,
Dachauer Strasse 665,
Munich 80995, Germany

1Present address: MAN Diesel & Turbo SE, Steinbrinkstr. 1, Oberhausen 46145, Germany.

2Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received November 23, 2014; final manuscript received December 17, 2014; published online February 3, 2015. Editor: Kenneth C. Hall.

J. Turbomach 137(8), 081010 (Aug 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-14-1302; doi: 10.1115/1.4029477 History: Received November 23, 2014; Revised December 17, 2014; Online February 03, 2015

This paper is the second part of a two-part paper reporting on the increase in efficiency of a 1.5 stage axial test rig turbine with the use of nonaxisymmetric endwalls and 3D airfoil design. Contoured endwalls were developed for the inlet guide vane separately, as well as in combination with a bowed radial profile stacking. In addition, a contour endwall was applied to the hub of the unshrouded rotor. In Part I, the design of the profiled endwalls and 3D airfoils is presented, as well as a detailed analysis of the steady and unsteady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results. Part II reports on the experimental validation of the numerical results. A distinct increase in mechanical efficiency for both new configurations in good agreement with the numerical results is observed. Additionally, performance map measurements demonstrate that the new designs are also beneficial under off-design conditions. Five- and three-hole-probes as well as fast-response total pressure probes are used to investigate the new designs. The main effect is the homogenization of the yaw angle behind the first stator.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cold-air turbine test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Total pressure at the inlet of the turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cross-sectional view of the turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Probe rake downstream of the second stator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Measurement grid for probe traversing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Five-hole-probe (left), three-hole probe (middle), and fast-response total pressure probe (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Selected configurations for the experimental investigations (shroud of the first stator is blanked)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Performance map for the three designs investigated at 100%, 90%, and 80% speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Evaluation of the efficiency for the new configurations at constant stage loading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Axial development of entropy of the new configurations in comparison to the basic design (unsteady CFD)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Yaw angle at the exit of the first stator (measurement plane 1): unsteady CFD (top), five-hole-probe (mid), and three-hole-probe (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Streamwise vorticity at the exit of the first stator for the three stator designs (unsteady CFD)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Streamwise vorticity at the exit of the first stator (measurement plane 1) for the three stator designs (five-hole-probe)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Total pressure loss coefficient ω at the exit of the first stator: unsteady CFD (top) and five-hole-probe (bottom, measurement plane 1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Time-averaged streamwise vorticity at the exit of the rotor for the three configurations (unsteady CFD)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

RMS of the random part of total pressure at the exit of the rotor (measurement plane 2, fast-response total pressure probe): basic design (top), ewc–ewc (mid), and f3d–ewc (bottom)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In