Research Papers

Improved Accuracy in Jet Impingement Heat Transfer Experiments Considering the Layer Thicknesses of a Triple Thermochromic Liquid Crystal Coating

[+] Author and Article Information
Alexandros Terzis

Group of Thermal Turbomachinery (GTT),
École Polytechnique Fédérale
de Lausanne (EPFL),
Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
e-mail: alexandros.terzis@me.com

Stavros Bontitsopoulos, Peter Ott

Group of Thermal Turbomachinery (GTT),
École Polytechnique Fédérale
de Lausanne (EPFL),
Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland

Jens von Wolfersdorf

Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics (ITLR),
University of Stuttgart,
Pfaffenwaldring 31,
Stuttgart D-70569, Germany

Anestis I. Kalfas

Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics
and Turbomachinery (LFMT),
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH),
Thessaloniki GR-54124, Greece

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received May 13, 2015; final manuscript received September 16, 2015; published online November 3, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Cengiz Camci.

J. Turbomach 138(2), 021003 (Nov 03, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-15-1094; doi: 10.1115/1.4031786 History: Received May 13, 2015; Revised September 16, 2015

This paper examines the applicability of a triple layer of thermochromic liquid crystals (TLCs) for the determination of local heat transfer coefficients using the transient liquid crystal (LC) technique. The experiments were carried out in a narrow impingement channel, typically used for turbine blade cooling applications. Three types of narrow bandwidth LCs (1 °C range) of 35 °C, 38 °C, and 41 °C were individually painted on the target plate of the cooling cavity and the overall paint thickness was accurately determined with an integral coating thickness gauge. The 1D transient heat conduction equation is then implicitly solved for each individual TLC layer on its realistic depth on the painted surface. Local heat transfer coefficients are therefore calculated three times for the same location in the flow improving the measurement accuracy, especially at regions where the LC detection times are too short (stagnation points) or too long (wall-jet regions). The results indicate that if multiple LC layers are used and the paint thickness is not considered, the heat transfer coefficients can be significantly underestimated.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Local Nusselt number distributions under a single round impingement jet. Adopted from Terzis [11].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Experimental setup: (a) 3D representation of the test facility and (b) schematic representation of the test model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of the different TLC layers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Hot gas temperature extraction for different thermocouples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Overall paint thickness measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

LC calibration test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Color-play of the TLC during calibration procedure: (a) 34.65 °C, (b) 34.71 °C, (c) 34.80 °C, (d) 34.85 °C, (e) 34.91 °C, (f) 35.01 °C, (g) 35.10 °C, (h) 35.15 °C, (i) 35.21 °C, and (j) 35.27 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Green channel intensity calibration curves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Video frames after the initiation of the heating step with base intensity level removed: (a) t = 0 s, reference image, (b) t = 2.2 s, TLC35 at stagnation regions, (c) t = 4.5 s, TLC38 at stagnation regions, (d) t = 7.5 s, TLC41 at stagnation regions, and (e) t = 15 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Normalized and filtered green intensity histories at two different locations in the flow domain: (a) stagnation points → short indication times → high heat transfer and (b) wall-jet regions → late indication times → low heat transfer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Time matrices at ReD = 37,500 for all TLC layers: (a) t for TLC35 and z = 16 μm, (b) t for TLC38 and z = 27 μm, and (c) t for TLC41 and z = 38 μm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Heat transfer coefficient (h/href) surface contours at ReD = 37,500 for all TLC layers. href = 350 W/(m2K): (a) TLC35 and z = 16 μm, (b) TLC38 and z = 27 μm, and (c) TLC41 and z = 38 μm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Local heat transfer coefficients on the channel centerline (y = 0) for all TLC layers, ReD = 37,500

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Effect of paint thickness on the evaluation of heat transfer coefficients for all examined experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Effect of paint thickness on the evaluation of heat transfer coefficients for all examined experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Individual uncertainty terms for all independent variables as a function of time. ReD = 27,500, z = 28 μm, and θ = 0.56.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Effect of coating thickness on the uncertainty term of z at the same θ = 0.46

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Probability density functions of the overall heat transfer coefficient. h¯=255.7  ± 33.1 W/(m2 K).




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In