Research Papers

Cooling Optimization Theory—Part I: Optimum Wall Temperature, Coolant Exit Temperature, and the Effect of Wall/Film Properties on Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
Benjamin Kirollos, Thomas Povey

Osney Thermofluids Laboratory,
Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Osney Mead, Oxford OX2 0ES, UK
e-mail: ben.kirollos@eng.ox.ac.uk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received December 3, 2015; final manuscript received December 8, 2015; published online March 15, 2016. Editor: Kenneth C. Hall.

J. Turbomach 138(8), 081002 (Mar 15, 2016) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-15-1289; doi: 10.1115/1.4032612 History: Received December 03, 2015; Revised December 08, 2015

Gas turbine cooling system design is constrained by a maximum allowable wall temperature (dictated by the material and the life requirements of the component), minimum coolant mass flow rate (the requirement to minimize cycle-efficiency cost), and uniform wall temperature (to reduce thermal stresses). These three design requirements form the basis of an iterative design process. The relationship between the requirements has received little discussion in the literature, despite being of interest from both a theoretical and a practical viewpoint. In this paper, we consider the optimum cooling system for parts with both internal and film cooling. We show analytically that the coolant mass flow rate is minimized when the wall temperature is uniform and equal to the maximum allowable wall temperature. Thus, we show that achieving uniform wall temperature achieves minimum coolant flow rate, and vice versa. The purpose is to clarify the interplay between two design requirements that are often discussed separately in the literature. The penalty (in terms of coolant mass flow) associated with cooling nonisothermal components is quantified. We show that a typical high pressure nozzle guide vane (HPNGV) operating isothermally at the maximum allowable wall temperature requires two-thirds the coolant of a typical nonisothermal vane. The optimum coolant exit temperature is also considered. It is shown analytically that the optimum coolant exit temperature depends on the balance between the mean adiabatic film cooling effectiveness, the nondimensional mass flow rate, and the Biot number of the thermal barrier coating (TBC). For the large majority of gas turbine cooling systems (e.g., a typical HPNGV) it is shown that the optimum coolant exit temperature is equal to the local wall temperature at the point of injection. For a small minority of systems (e.g., long effusion cooling systems operating at low mass flow rates), it is shown that the coolant exit temperature should be minimized. An approximation relating the wall/film properties, the nondimensional mass flow, and the overall cooling effectiveness is derived. It is used to estimate the effect of Biot number (TBC and metal), heat transfer coefficient (HTC) ratio, and film properties on the performance of a typical HPNGV and effusion cooling system. In Part II, we show that designs which achieve uniform wall temperature have a particular corresponding internal HTC distribution.

Copyright © 2016 by Rolls-Royce plc
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cooling system example

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Example cooling system temperature distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cooling system temperature distributions: Tw1(x)<Tlim

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cooling system temperature distributions: Tw1(x)=Tlim

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Quasi-2D generalized cooling system temperature distributions; effect of increasing coolant exit temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Approximation relating cooling efficiency, nondimensional mass flow rate, HTC ratio, and Biot number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Approximation relating the mean film cooling effectiveness to the nondimensional mass flow for known reference conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Overall cooling effectiveness as a function of nondimensional mass flow and Biot number, for HPNGV-typical wall/film properties

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Overall cooling effectiveness as a function of nondimensional mass flow and Biot number, for the start of a typical effusion cooling system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Overall cooling effectiveness as a function of nondimensional mass flow and Biot number, for the end of a typical effusion system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of TBC on TBC overall cooling effectiveness as a function of nondimensional mass flow, for the boundary conditions in Fig. 10

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effect of TBC on overall cooling effectiveness (external wall) as a function of nondimensional mass flow, for the boundary conditions in Fig. 10

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Temperature distribution representative of the suction-side of an HPNGV

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Ratio of optimized to unoptimized nondimensional mass flow for a nonisothermal system





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In