0
Research Papers

Heat Transfer and Pressure Loss Measurements in Additively Manufactured Wavy Microchannels

[+] Author and Article Information
Kathryn L. Kirsch

Department of Mechanical and
Nuclear Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: kathryn.kirsch@psu.edu

Karen A. Thole

Department of Mechanical and
Nuclear Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: kthole@engr.psu.edu

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 12, 2016; final manuscript received July 18, 2016; published online September 13, 2016. Editor: Kenneth Hall.

J. Turbomach 139(1), 011007 (Sep 13, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: TURBO-16-1155; doi: 10.1115/1.4034342 History: Received July 12, 2016; Revised July 18, 2016

The role of additive manufacturing for the hot section components of gas turbine engines grows ever larger as progress in the industry continues. The opportunity for the heat transfer community is to exploit the use of additive manufacturing in developing nontraditional cooling schemes to be built directly into components. This study investigates the heat transfer and pressure loss performance of additively manufactured wavy channels. Three coupons, each containing channels of a specified wavelength (length of one wave period), were manufactured via direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) and tested at a range of Reynolds numbers. Results show that short wavelength channels yield high pressure losses, without corresponding increases in heat transfer, due to the flow structure promoted by the waves. Longer wavelength channels offer less of a penalty in pressure drop with good heat transfer performance.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Description of the coupon build, with pertinent dimensions included. Flow direction is normal to the flange face.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Change in flow area through one period of each of the wavy channel cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Visual representation of the test matrix used for this study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Description of the wave formulation. Flow goes left to right.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

2D CT scan image. The surface determination algorithm outlined both external and internal coupon surfaces. The dark gray color represents the material and the light gray areas represent the open channels. Overlaid on the CT scan image is the design intent.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Line plots of surface roughness on two surfaces from one channel. The line is the curve fit to the surface and the scatter in the plot represents the points on the surface that deviate from the fit.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Rendering of the test section setup for both pressure loss and heat transfer measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Slice of the structured grid for a segment of the λ = 0.2L case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Friction factor versus Reynolds number. Included in the plot are data from additively manufactured straight rectangular channels of comparable size [11].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Velocity vectors, colored by normalized velocity, of slices through each of the wavy channel cases with Re = 5000. Slices were taken at the second full peak in the wave, as indicated above the contour slices. Note that fluid next to the left wall of the λ = 0.1L case is near zero and that a full dean vortex forms in the λ = 0.4L case.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Top-down view of normalized velocity through each of the wavy channel cases with Re = 5000. Flow goes from left to right. Note the pockets of low velocity in each peak and trough of the λ = 0.1L case.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Friction factor augmentation versus Reynolds number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Nusselt number versus Reynolds number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Nusselt number augmentation versus Reynolds number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Friction factor augmentation versus heat transfer augmentation

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In