0
Research Papers

Modulation and Radial Migration of Turbine Hub Cavity Modes by the Rim Seal Purge Flow

[+] Author and Article Information
R. Schädler

Laboratory for Energy Conversion,
Department of Mechanical
and Process Engineering,
ETH Zurich,
Sonneggstrasse 3,
Zurich CH-8092, Switzerland
e-mail: schaedler@lec.mavt.ethz.ch

A. I. Kalfas

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,
Thessaloniki GR-54124, Greece
e-mail: akalfas@auth.gr

R. S. Abhari

Laboratory for Energy Conversion,
Department of Mechanical
and Process Engineering,
ETH Zurich,
Sonneggstrasse 3,
Zurich CH-8092, Switzerland
e-mail: abhari@lec.mavt.ethz.ch

G. Schmid

Siemens AG,
Mellinghofer Str. 55,
Muelheim an der Ruhr D-45473, Germany
e-mail: gregor.schmid@siemens.com

S. Voelker

Siemens AG,
Mellinghofer Str. 55,
Muelheim an der Ruhr D-45473, Germany
e-mail: voelker.stefan@siemens.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 18, 2016; final manuscript received August 2, 2016; published online September 20, 2016. Editor: Kenneth Hall.The content of this paper is copyrighted by Siemens Energy, Inc. and is licensed to ASME for publication and distribution only. Any inquiries regarding permission to use the content of this paper, in whole or in part, for any purpose must be addressed to Siemens Energy, Inc. directly.

J. Turbomach 139(1), 011011 (Sep 20, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: TURBO-16-1161; doi: 10.1115/1.4034416 History: Received July 18, 2016; Revised August 02, 2016

In the present paper, the results of an experimental and numerical investigation of the hub cavity modes and their migration into the main annulus flow are presented. A one-and-a-half stage, unshrouded and highly loaded axial turbine configuration with three-dimensionally shaped blades and cylindrical end walls has been tested in an axial turbine facility. Both the blade design and the rim seal purge flow path are representative to modern high-pressure gas turbines. The unsteady flow field at the hub cavity exit region has been measured with the fast-response aerodynamic probe (FRAP) for two different rim seal purge flow rates. Furthermore, fast-response wall-mounted pressure transducers have been installed inside the cavity. Unsteady full-annular computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been employed in order to complement the experimental work. The time-resolved pressure measurements inside the hub cavity reveal clear cavity modes, which show a strong dependency on the injected amount of rim seal purge flow. The numerical predictions provide information on the origin of these modes and relate them to pronounced ingestion spots around the circumference. The unsteady probe measurements at the rim seal interface show that the signature of the hub cavity induced modes migrates into the main annulus flow up to 30% blade span. Based on that, an aerodynamic loss mechanism has been found, showing that the benefit in loss reduction by decreasing the rim seal purge flow rate is weakened by the presence of turbine hub cavity modes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by Siemens Energy Inc.
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Johnson, B. V. , Mack, G. J. , Paolillo, R. E. , and Daniels, W. A. , 1994, “ Turbine Rim Seal Gas Path Flow Ingestion Mechanisms,” AIAA Paper No. 94-2703.
Popović, I. , and Hodson, H. P. , 2013, “ The Effects of a Parametric Variation of the Rim Seal Geometry on the Interaction Between Hub Leakage and Mainstream Flows in High Pressure Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(11), p. 112501. [CrossRef]
Popović, I. , and Hodson, H. P. , 2010, “ Aerothermal Impact of the Interaction Between Hub Leakage and Mainstream Flows in Highly-Loaded HP Turbine Blades,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(6), p. 061014.
Julien, S. , Lefrancois, J. , Dumas, G. , Boutet-Blais, G. , Lapointe, S. , Caron, J.-F. , and Marini, R. , 2010, “ Simulations of Flow Ingestion and Related Structures in a Turbine Disk Cavity,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-22729.
Boudet, J. , Hills, N. J. , and Chew, J. W. , 2006, “ Numerical Simulation of the Flow Interaction Between Turbine Main Annulus and Disc Cavities,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90307.
Jakoby, R. , Zierer, T. , DeVito, L. , Lindblad, K. , Larsson, J. , Bohn, D. E. , Funcke, J. , and Decker, A. , 2004, “ Numerical Simulation of the Unsteady Flow Field in an Axial Gas Turbine Rim Seal Configuration,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53829.
Chilla, M. , Hodson, H. P. , and Newman, D. , 2013, “ Unsteady Interaction Between Annulus and Turbine Rim Seal Flows,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(5), p. 051024. [CrossRef]
Schuepbach, P. , Abhari, R. S. , Rose, M. G. , Germain, T. , Raab, I. , and Gier, J. , 2010, “ Effects of Suction and Injection Purge-Flow on the Secondary Flow Structures of a High-Work Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132(2), p. 021021. [CrossRef]
Hunter, S. D. , and Manwaring, S. R. , 2000, “ Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine—Part I: Experimental and Numerical Investigations,” ASME Paper No. GT2000-651.
Jenny, P. , Abhari, R. S. , Rose, M. G. , Brettschneider, M. , Gier, J. , and Engel, K. , 2011, “ Low-Pressure Turbine End Wall Design Optimisation and Experimental Verification in the Presence of Purge Flow,” ISABE Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, Sept. 12–16, Paper No. ISABE-2011-1717.
Reid, K. , Denton, J. D. , Pullan, G. , Curtis, E. , and Longley, J. , 2006, “ The Effect of Stator-Rotor Hub Sealing Flow on the Mainstream Aerodynamics of a Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90838.
Mclean, C. , Camci, C. , and Glezer, B. , 2001, “ Mainstream Aerodynamic Effects Due to Wheelspace Coolant Injection in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage—Part I: Aerodynamic Measurements in the Stationary Frame,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123(4), pp. 687–696. [CrossRef]
Paniagua, G. , Dénos, R. , and Almeida, S. , 2004, “ Effect of the Hub Endwall Cavity Flow on the Flow-Field of a Transonic High-Pressure Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(4), pp. 578–586. [CrossRef]
Ong, J. H. P. , Miller, R. J. , and Uchida, S. , 2012, “ The Effect of Coolant Injection on the Endwall Flow of a High Pressure Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(5), p. 051003. [CrossRef]
Behr, T. , Kalfas, A. I. , and Abhari, R. S. , 2007, “ Unsteady Flow Physics and Performance of a One-and-1/2-Stage Unshrouded High Work Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 129(2), pp. 348–359. [CrossRef]
Regina, K. , Kalfas, A. I. , Abhari, R. S. , Lohaus, A. , Voelker, S. , and auf dem Kampe, T. , 2014, “ Aerodynamic Robustness of End Wall Contouring Against Rim Seal Purge Flow,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-26007.
Kupferschmied, P. , Köppel, P. , Gizzi, W. , Roduner, C. , and Gyarmathy, G. , 2000, “ Time-Resolved Flow Measurements With Fast-Response Aerodynamic Probes for Turbomachines,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 11(7), pp. 1036–1054. [CrossRef]
Pfau, A. , Schlienger, J. , Kalfas, A. I. , and Abhari, R. S. , 2003, “ Unsteady 3-Dimensional Flow Measurement Using a Miniature Virtual 4 Sensor Fast Response Aerodynamic Probe (FRAP),” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38128.
Bosdas, I. , Mansour, M. , Kalfas, A. I. , Abhari, R. S. , and Senoo, S. , 2015, “ Unsteady Wet Steam Flow Field Measurements in the Last Stage of Low Pressure Steam Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 138(3), p. 032601. [CrossRef]
Burdet, A. , 2005, “ A Computationally Efficient Feature-Based Jet Model for Prediction of Film-Cooling Flows,” Ph.D. thesis, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland, Dissertation ETH No. 16163.
Basol, A. M. , Raheem, A. , Huber, M. , and Abhari, R. S. , 2014, “ Full-Annular Numerical Investigations of the Rim Seal Cavity Flows Using GPU's,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-26755.
Behr, T. , 2007, “ Control of Rotor Tip Leakage and Secondary Flow by Casing Air Injection in Unshrouded Axial Turbines,” Ph.D. thesis, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland, Dissertation ETH No. 17283.
Laveau, B. , Abhari, R. S. , Crawford, M. E. , and Lutum, E. , 2014, “ High Resolution Heat Transfer Measurements on the Stator Endwall of an Axial Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(4), p. 041005. [CrossRef]
Porreca, L. , Hollenstein, M. , Kalfas, A. I. , and Abhari, R. S. , 2007, “ Turbulence Measurements and Analysis in a Multistage Axial Turbine,” J. Propul. Power, 23(1), pp. 227–234. [CrossRef]
Jenny, P. , 2012, “ Interaction Mechanisms Between Rim Seal Purge Flow and Profiled End Walls in a Low-Pressure Turbine,” Ph.D. thesis, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland, Dissertation ETH No. 20429.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematics of rim seal purge flow path (left) and close-up view of rotor upstream rim seal (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

FRAP probe tip schematic (left) and measurement location (right) of inclined probe measurements R in tilted (dash-dot line) and hub cavity absolute wall pressure transducers (spot). The position of axial slice for CFD normalized static pressure is indicated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Experimentally determined pressure frequency spectra for four different injection rate cases inside the hub cavity at −12% span

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Measured incremental increase of sound pressure level SPL (dB) induced by the cavity modes with respect to the suppressed cavity mode case IR3 = 1.2% inside the hub cavity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Predicted pressure frequency spectrum for two rim seal purge flow injection rates at−12% span inside the hub cavity: IR0 = 0.0% (left) and IR2 = 0.8% (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Instantaneous map of predicted normalized static pressure (-) over the full-annulus for IR0 = 0.0% and IR2 = 0.8%, indication of 8 (IR0 = 0.0%) and 22 (IR2 = 0.8%) low static pressure zones inside the hub cavity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Close-up view of meridional slice through local low static pressure zone (slices 1 and 3, left) and between two low pressure zones (slices 2 and 4, right) for IR0 and IR2 superimposed with normalized radial velocity contour (-) and hub cavity stream lines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Time-averaged rms of p′1 (Pa) in stationary frame of reference at R in tilted plane: (a) IR2 = 0.8%, (b) IR3 = 1.2%, and (c) relative change of rms p′1 (-) by increasing IR2 to IR3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Time-averaged axial vorticity (Hz): (a) IR2 = 0.8% and (b) IR3 = 1.2%. Indication of secondary flow structures: trailing edge shed vortex (TESV) and stator 1 hub passage vortex (HPV).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Pressure spectral analysis at three spanwise positions and stator pitch 0.5 for rim seal purge flow IR2 = 0.8% (left column, left) and IR3 = 1.2% (right column)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Time-averaged total pressure loss coefficient Y (-) in stationary frame of reference at R in tilted plane: (a) IR2 = 0.8% and (b) IR3 = 1.2%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Space time plot of total pressure loss coefficient Y (-) at 10% blade span: (a) IR2 = 0.8%, (b) IR3 = 1.2%, and (c) 2D representation at 0.5 stator pitch and 10% span for six consecutive rotor blade passing events

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In